I'm seeing the 12 core Mac Pro for $2499
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Apple&#...541222006&skuId=4837613&st=mac mini&cp=1&lp=7
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Apple&#...541222006&skuId=4837613&st=mac mini&cp=1&lp=7
I'm seeing the 12 core Mac Pro for $2499
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/Apple&#...541222006&skuId=4837613&st=mac mini&cp=1&lp=7
hmm.tempting to try
I'd rather have this for $300 less:
http://www.amazon.com/Apple-MD770LL...dp/B00747WW9E/ref=amtcd_B00747XA9A_B00747WW9E
What you see is probably what you'd get.
Moreover, if I were inclined to go this route, I'd quickly swap those two 2.4 GHz 6-core Xeons [ E5645 ] for two 3.3 GHz 6-core Xeons [ X5680 ] for <$1800 a pair [ https://www.eoptionsonline.com/p-2049-594880-001.aspx ] for a total outlay at this stage of about $4,300 [$2500 + $1800]. Then I'd slap those two E5645s in a $429 EVGA SR-2 [ http://www.evga.com/Products/Product.aspx?pn=270-WS-W555-A2 ] and raise the BCLK by 1.44x [ from 133 to 180 ] and underclock them by decreasing the CPU clock multiplier from 18 [ factory ] to 13 [ running at 2.34 GHz at idle but turbo boosting to 3.78 GHz], yielding a system at least 1.29x faster than the top of the line 2010 Mac Pro and yielding a Geekbench 2 score of about 31,212.48 vs. 28,500 for a Mac Pro with dual x5690s [ http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/985164 ] and a Cinebench 11.5 score of about 19.93 vs. about 18.23 for a Mac Pro with dual x5690s.
Here's the paper tape of calculations (rounded to 2 decimal places):
180 MHz / 133 MHz = 1.35
180 MHz / 133 MHz * 2.4 = 3.25 GHz
3.46 GHz / 2.4 GHz = 1.44
24 * 133 = 3192
2400 MHz / 133 MHz = 18.05
13 * 180 MHz = 2340 MHz
18 * 180 MHz = 3240 MHz
2400 + 133 + 133 + 133 [3 steps or bins for turbo] = 2799 MHz
21 * 180 MHz = 3780 MHz
21 * 180 MHz / 3070 MHz = 1.23 MHz
21 * 180 MHz / 3070 MHz * 25,376 = 31212.48
21 * 180 MHz = 3780
3780 MHz / 3070 MHz = 1.23
1.23 * 25,376 = 31,212.48
3.78 GHz/ 2.93 GHz = 1.29
1.29 * 15.45 [http://www.cbscores.com] = 19.93
3.33 GHz / 2.93 GHz = 1.14
3.33 GHz / 2.93 GHz * 15.45 [http://www.cbscores.com] = 17.56
3.46 GHz / 2.93 GHz = 1.18 [speed diff. between CPU swapped dual x5690s v. 2010 Mac Pro]
1.18 * 15.45 [http://www.cbscores.com] = 18.23
Currently a pair of E5645s can be had/sold on E-bay for about $1k [ http://www.ebay.com/itm/Intel-Xeon-...OEM-/160665460243?pt=CPUs&hash=item2568685e13 ].
But because I'm extremely frugal (many call me "cheap"), I more than likely just only go the route building a third EVGA SR-2 system with dual X5680s to get an underclocked system that runs at under 2.5 GHz at idle but at about 5.0 GHz at max turbo and scores over 40,000 in Geekbench 2 and over 24.7 in Cinebench 11.5 for easily under $4K.
I have a '10 2.4 Quad Core and was going to jump on this. But reading about the Dual Hex for Photoshop, and taking into consideration the clock speed, it doesn't seem like it would be that big of a boost for me as it seems "on paper". I mainly use Adobe CS for print and web. And a lot a big, layered files in PS.
Is my assumption correct? If not, I'll jump on this deal.
I think that the price is legit. They are probably just dumping inventory in anticipation of the imminent launch of the new MacPro. OK maybe just dumping inventoryIt's not like it's a crazy price like $999 it's about a 30% reduction on the price that B&H are asking for the exact same model.
You never cease to impress me with your knowledge on this stuff.
I see B&H Photo has in stock the 3.33 six core Mac Pro. I thought that's always been a BTO model that was only available directly from Apple and Power Max/The MacStore?
What you see is probably what you'd get.
Moreover, if I were inclined to go this route, I'd quickly swap those two 2.4 GHz 6-core Xeons [ E5645 ] for two 3.3 GHz 6-core Xeons [ X5680 ] for <$1800 a pair [ https://www.eoptionsonline.com/p-2049-594880-001.aspx ] for a total outlay at this stage of about $4,300 [$2500 + $1800]. Then I'd slap those two E5645s in a $429 EVGA SR-2 [ http://www.evga.com/Products/Product.aspx?pn=270-WS-W555-A2 ] and raise the BCLK by 1.44x [ from 133 to 180 ] and underclock them by decreasing the CPU clock multiplier from 18 [ factory ] to 13 [ running at 2.34 GHz at idle but turbo boosting to 3.78 GHz], yielding a system at least 1.29x faster than the top of the line 2010 Mac Pro and yielding a Geekbench 2 score of about 31,212.48 vs. 28,500 for a Mac Pro with dual x5690s [ http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench2/985164 ] and a Cinebench 11.5 score of about 19.93 vs. about 18.23 for a Mac Pro with dual x5690s.
----------
I actually made this purchase, so Tutors idea, intrigues me.
B&H Photo Video has long carried or been able to order top of the line Apple computers for photographers, musicians and videographers.
wow, that was impressive. Am I reading this right that you're basically saying, you would swamp the processors for two 3.3 GHz 6-core processors, and use the remaining two, to build another computer? or just sell them? I'm interested in your plan.