So Folks, in your opinion, will the Studio be refreshed in June with the M4 chip family?
There's a 50/50 chance, but I'm going with no and hope I'm wrong.
So Folks, in your opinion, will the Studio be refreshed in June with the M4 chip family?
But damn, M4s on iPads and M2s on the Studio (not even M3s). It's damaging for Apple's reputation as a "pro" company at the very least (not arguing with you, just thinking aloud)...There a 50/50 chance, but I'm going with no and hope I'm wrong.
But damn, M4s on iPads and M2s on the Studio (not even M3s). It's damaging for Apple's reputation as a "pro" company at the very least (not arguing with you, just thinking aloud)...
Pretty sure they're more than $600. I priced one on the Apple website (1 TB model) and it was comfortably in base model Mac Studio territory...It really is bizarre that a $600 M4 iPad has a significantly faster single core than the $4k M2 Ultra Studio or the $7K M2 Ultra Mac Pro.
Yep, pretty much.I doubt that there will be any new M3 device.
This is mostly due to the fact that TSMCs N3B was not what everyone hoped for. Problems all the way, low yield rates with wavers. So why the iPad Pro got the M4 in N3E first? Because the sales are rather low compared to most other devices from Apple, means its better suited for a controlled start of N3E production.
Yields with N3E are way better.
And here we are why the M4 had to be redesigned, chip designs on N3B are not compatible with N3E.
So it wasnt because of AI whatever pressure why the M4 was now introduced, its the costs, which are significantly lower with N3E.
So whats the next device to go M4?
I bet it will the the iMac which is still on M2.
Mac Studio might be, but i would not expect this before fall.
As the next TSMS itteration N3P will be just a shrinking, dont expect the same huge performance benefits as from M3 to M4.
This all also means, dont expect the same same chip strategy with iPhones as in the last years.
From a cost perspective it doesnt make any sense for apple to produce the old architecture chips for cheaper phones. So they will go all A18 there.
Makes sense. Base M4 Max Mac Studio could have 18 CPU Cores and 40-48 GPU cores, making it perform slightly better than the M2 Ultra and still consume less than 20watts of electricity for many tasks.I doubt that there will be any new M3 device.
This is mostly due to the fact that TSMCs N3B was not what everyone hoped for. Problems all the way, low yield rates with wavers. So why the iPad Pro got the M4 in N3E first? Because the sales are rather low compared to most other devices from Apple, means its better suited for a controlled start of N3E production.
Yields with N3E are way better.
And here we are why the M4 had to be redesigned, chip designs on N3B are not compatible with N3E.
So it wasnt because of AI whatever pressure why the M4 was now introduced, its the costs, which are significantly lower with N3E.
So whats the next device to go M4?
I bet it will the the iMac which is still on M2.
Mac Studio might be, but i would not expect this before fall.
As the next TSMS itteration N3P will be just a shrinking, dont expect the same huge performance benefits as from M3 to M4.
This all also means, dont expect the same same chip strategy with iPhones as in the last years.
From a cost perspective it doesnt make any sense for apple to produce the old architecture chips for cheaper phones. So they will go all A18 there.
There never was an M2 iMac. The latest iMac is the M3 iMac, and it was the successor to the M1 iMacI bet it will the the iMac which is still on M2.
oh dearThe latest update from Gurman has arrived.
If accurate, the 2nd half '25 M4 Studio and Mac Pro are reiterated.
I suppose WWDC in a few weeks will spill the beans.
Or not.
Gurman: No New Mac Studio and Mac Pro Until Mid-2025
Apple will not refresh the Mac Studio and Mac Pro with next-generation high-end chips until the middle of 2025, according to Bloomberg's Mark...www.macrumors.com
To make things even weirder there are SUPPOSEDLY M4 Mac minis coming this year...it makes zero sense. Why give us Raytracing and Mesh etc. when the computers that need it the most are still on M2. What is Apple smoking?
I doubt that there will be any new M3 device.
This is mostly due to the fact that TSMCs N3B was not what everyone hoped for. Problems all the way, low yield rates with wavers.
So why the iPad Pro got the M4 in N3E first? Because the sales are rather low compared to most other devices from Apple, means its better suited for a controlled start of N3E production.
Yields with N3E are way better.
So whats the next device to go M4?
I bet it will the the iMac which is still on M2.
Mac Studio might be, but i would not expect this before fall.
As the next TSMS itteration N3P will be just a shrinking, dont expect the same huge performance benefits as from M3 to M4.
To make things even weirder there are SUPPOSEDLY M4 Mac minis coming this year...
The M2 Studio is more expensive than the M1 version here in Canada, so it probably depends on your local market. I’m expecting the next one to go up even more as the US dollar is so strong.Do you think the price of the Studio will increase with the M4? I've got quite a bit saved now for a new computer, a bit longer and I can get a Studio but would rather wait for an M4. I was looking at the MacBook Pro's and thinking maybe wait for that to get M4 and OLED but at £3600 it's a lot more money, like about a grand more and I bet the price goes up with an OLED screen.
Do you think the price of the Studio will increase with the M4? I've got quite a bit saved now for a new computer, a bit longer and I can get a Studio but would rather wait for an M4. I was looking at the MacBook Pro's and thinking maybe wait for that to get M4 and OLED but at £3600 it's a lot more money, like about a grand more and I bet the price goes up with an OLED screen.
Don't get OLED for a computer. You will totally get burn in unless you baby your machine and use it few hours a day only.
OLED is still flawed tech. Burn in wasn't solved yet. Its reduced but its more prone to happen on a computer that is on for 10+ hours a day everyday.
Unless you use computer for just few hours a day then you will be pissed off to spend so much money and then have to deal with this 'built in' flaw
Exactly and with tandem OLED this is further reduced as each panel can cut on how bright it is and by this further reduce the aging processDon't know where you get your info from, but they more or less have solved OLED burn in. I've got an OLED TV from 2019 and have used it a LOT and it doesn't have a trace of burn in, thanks to the tech it has built in to prevent it, and that's from 2019.
Yes they may not last as long as LCD. But it's not like they don't last years. But if you like anything you want a good quality screen that lasts you have to pay for it.
Don't know where you get your info from, but they more or less have solved OLED burn in. I've got an OLED TV from 2019 and have used it a LOT and it doesn't have a trace of burn in, thanks to the tech it has built in to prevent it, and that's from 2019.
Yes they may not last as long as LCD. But it's not like they don't last years. But if you like anything you want a good quality screen that lasts you have to pay for it.
Burn in is not solved. Burn in is reduced.
With computer being on for most people for 12+ hours a day with static stuff you will get burn in.
Don't know where you get your info from but thats the reality with OLED.
There are ways to reduce the risk but the risk is still there and will be for a while.