Yes they are. Two 4 lanes encoded into thunderbolt stream i.e 8 lanes of display port traffic on the link. I didn’t say they are all 8 lanes going to the same sink. The display has two sinks and traffic from both of them a total of 8 lanes is tunnelthrough thunderbolt.There is no such thing as 8 lanes of DisplayPort. Max lanes is 4, even when using Thunderbolt.
Look at the iMac 5K display or LG 5K display with the AGDCDiagnose command on an intel Mac. It shows two 4 lane connections of HBR2 (DisplayPort 1.2) just like it does for a Dell UP2715K or a HP Z27q. Doesn't matter if they go through Thunderbolt or not. The DisplayPort connections are separate.
Look at the iMac 5K display or LG 5K display with the AGDCDiagnose command on an intel Mac. It shows two 4 lane connections of HBR2 (DisplayPort 1.2) just like it does for a Dell UP2715K or a HP Z27q. Doesn't matter if they go through Thunderbolt or not. The DisplayPort connections are separate.
I agree that the DisplayPort connections may occur at different times or appear in a different order or have tile info specified in the EDID in a different way, but Apple has handled these issues ever since they added support for multi tiled-displays a long time ago.
The M1 doesn’t seem to have the same display resources like those systems in the last. Intel is capable of 3 displays so when one is taken up for built-in the other two are bonded together for tiled displays. That’s why you get 2 displays or one tiled display. AMD GPUs support more displays that’s why the 16” model can support more but tiled displays will alway reduce the total number of displays by and extra one. I don’t see why Apple would restrict things to one display if there were more resources to support more displays like the Intel or AMD GPUs.
The M1 doesn’t support 3 displays so ergo it it doing some thing to share one display resowith tiled displays. How apple handled things in the past doesn’t really matter.
They mention these same displays in their support documents (have to find them on the wayback machine now). For example, with the Dell or HP display, I can connect either cable, then connect the other cable any time later to get 5K.
For M1 Macs? I couldn’t find it in the support documents.
The order and timing do not matter. The system gets the EDID for one connection, then when it gets the EDID of the other connection, it can see that all tiles are connected, then create the single spanning frame buffer.
Yes on intel Macs. We are not talking about intel Macs.
This flaky behaviour we're seeing on M1 Macs is a regression in functionality caused by a change of the graphics system (it's using iPhone graphics instead of Mac graphics) and Apple's inadequate testing.
Not if Apple never claimed to support two cable tiled displays. I’d like to see the support document that says M1 Macs support two displays or two cable tiled displays. Also it has nothing to do with graphics, the display engine on all GPUs/SoC is different blocks on silicon. The M1 SoC has 7-8 core GPUs vs 4 on iPhone. I have no idea what Mac graphics means in this context when it clearly outclasses most integrated GPUs on Macs or even PCs.
Last edited: