Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Allen_Wentz

macrumors 68040
Dec 3, 2016
3,389
3,844
USA
Your words have a funny way of changing when you quote them. Incidentally, I quoted what you said as it was written.

In any case, someone, whose needs would be perfectly met on a Base M1 or M2, does not need an M1 Max or M2 Max over an M1 Pro or M2 Pro just because adding more GPU cores would future-proof the device. If you study (a) how Apple has dropped support for Intel Macs and (b) how Apple has dropped support for its other SoCs in other devices, GPU makes no difference. Apple never said "yeah, we'll support the 2015 15-inch MacBook Pro, but only the AMD Radeon models and not the Intel Iris Pro 5200 only models". That's not how they draw lines when determining what gets support versus what doesn't. RAM will likely matter; though, not at the border between 16GB and 24GB/32GB; other key architectural differences will be what causes an M1 or M1 Pro Mac to lose support; not the difference between a Pro and a Max chip.
FYI my words do not change. I go to great pains to go back and review what I originally said and then provide an exact quote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scrambledwonder

Yebubbleman

macrumors 603
May 20, 2010
6,025
2,617
Los Angeles, CA
FYI my words do not change. I go to great pains to go back and review what I originally said and then provide an exact quote.
They did. You did not quote them exactly. But, I'm not on here to discuss your wording and how it changes when you decide to quote it without either actually copying and pasting your words or using this forum's quoting function.
 

scrambledwonder

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 4, 2006
314
18
Berkeley, CA
No need for childish sarcasm. I did not say what to buy, I just pointed out the consequences of different choices. Many folks want a free lunch, but there is no free lunch: save some money by skimping on a 2023 purchase and spend 2024, 2025, 2026, 2027 and 2028 living with a box limited from day one. Or pay more.

Your choice, and I am not being sarcastic. Paying to be better equipped, or choosing a shorter life cycle or accepting limitations are real alternatives. Your choice. The good news is that today's M2 MBPs allow the options of WiFi 6E, Bluetooth 5.3, Max chips and up to 96 GB RAM for those looking forward. Or decide cost is too high and accept limitations.

You came looking for advice. In decades of buying Macs my advice is to buy for the life cycle you choose. Skimping on things like RAM or chip version is only effective for arbitrarily short life cycles.
You're right, my bad! Have a great life man!
 

scrambledwonder

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 4, 2006
314
18
Berkeley, CA
1. The M1 will be more than enough for you.
2. As you are looking for longevity, I would recommend the M2 which is a current, 2023 machine.
3. The M1 is a solid machine, but is a 2021 build. Yes, it's a great chip, but it's not current tech.

4. Very good to go with 16 GB of ram and 1 TB hard drive.

5. You should consider the new 15" MBA. It's a bit smaller than your old 2017 MBP but can get you a brand new machine with 8 core CPU, 10 core GPU, 16 GB of ram and a 1 TB hard drive for $1899.
Thanks! I've been spending some time with the 15-inch MBA and I think for the money the M1 MBP 14 is a better buy. More powerful, same ram + storage, better screen (but smaller), better speakers, more ports (including SD card slot), and cheaper! Both are very very nice, though. I actually prefer the design of the 15-inch MBA. It looks better, IMO. It's the black keyboard well on the MBPs that get me. Not a fan.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eltoslightfoot

Ubele

macrumors 6502a
Mar 20, 2008
903
344
OP, I don't think you'll regret getting the M1 MBP. My use case is very similar to yours. I had a 2019 27" iMac with 24 GB of RAM and a 2 TB Fusion Drive, and a 2015 13" MBP with 8 GB of RAM and an after-market OWC 1 TB SSD, which was an ideal combination for me. I used the iMac in my home office for the heavy lifting and the MBP for lighter tasks elsewhere around the house. When my dad's computer died, I gave him my MBP and got a 12.9" iPad Pro, hoping it would be a suitable replacement for my MBP. Alas, while I love the IPP for many things, it didn't prove to be a Mac replacement for what I do.

My first thought was to buy a refurbished base-model M1 MBA as a backup to my iMac, but since I have a couple apps I use that make you buy a separate license for each computer (I hate when they do that), I decided that it made more sense to give my iMac to my wife and get a good-for-my-needs Mac laptop, along with an external monitor. How much computer did I need? Well, a refurbished M2 MBA (in midnight blue, of course) with 16 GB of RAM and a 1 TB SSD would have been plenty. However, the screen on the 16" MBP was so tempting, given that I do a lot of hobby-level photo and video editing and use other apps where having more screen real estate makes a difference. I rarely take my computer out of the house, so the size and weight of the 16" MBP didn't bother me. Given that a refurbished M1 16" MBP with 16 GB of RAM and a 1 TB SSD was only $280 more than the M2 MBA I was considering, I decided to go for it.

I have absolutely no regrets. The screen is so big that I haven't yet felt a need to get an external monitor. I've used the extra ports more than I expected. The processor is more than powerful enough for my needs. The 2019 iMac was fine, but the new MBP is much faster, especially for exporting videos I edit in Adobe Premiere.

Which brings up my final point: What you use your computer for sounds almost identical to what I use mine for. I, too, like to keep my computers for four or five years. Bear in mind that my four-year-old iMac was still perfectly adequate for what I do, and I probably would have continued to use it until Apple stopped supporting Intel-based Macs. Even my 2015 MBP was still fine for email, web browsing, and basic productivity apps like MS Office. As someone who used to buy high-end tech gear in general in the belief that it would future-proof me or give me capabilities that I might want or need over the next few years, I finally realized that I'd spent many thousands of dollars in my lifetime for features and power I never used. I decided to switch to the approach a good friend of mine has always used: figure out the minimum I need now, and add a little more power/features/whatever. If, a couple years down the line, it turns out that I'm doing new things that require more whatever, I can sell what I have and then buy what I need.

Yes, an M2 MBP might give you another year or two of use over an M1, and it will have better resale value -- but you'll pay more for it up front. The M1 MBP has far more power than I need (I read and watched several reviews in which the reviewers threw everything they could at it -- far more than I ever would -- and it never slowed down or got hot), so why would I spend more money for an M2 MBP with 32 GB of RAM, when I'm unlikely to overly tax my M1 during its useful lifespan? So what if the M1 is "old tech"?

Anyway, good luck with whatever you decide to get!
 
  • Like
Reactions: scrambledwonder

scrambledwonder

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 4, 2006
314
18
Berkeley, CA
OP, I don't think you'll regret getting the M1 MBP. My use case is very similar to yours. I had a 2019 27" iMac with 24 GB of RAM and a 2 TB Fusion Drive, and a 2015 13" MBP with 8 GB of RAM and an after-market OWC 1 TB SSD, which was an ideal combination for me. I used the iMac in my home office for the heavy lifting and the MBP for lighter tasks elsewhere around the house. When my dad's computer died, I gave him my MBP and got a 12.9" iPad Pro, hoping it would be a suitable replacement for my MBP. Alas, while I love the IPP for many things, it didn't prove to be a Mac replacement for what I do.

My first thought was to buy a refurbished base-model M1 MBA as a backup to my iMac, but since I have a couple apps I use that make you buy a separate license for each computer (I hate when they do that), I decided that it made more sense to give my iMac to my wife and get a good-for-my-needs Mac laptop, along with an external monitor. How much computer did I need? Well, a refurbished M2 MBA (in midnight blue, of course) with 16 GB of RAM and a 1 TB SSD would have been plenty. However, the screen on the 16" MBP was so tempting, given that I do a lot of hobby-level photo and video editing and use other apps where having more screen real estate makes a difference. I rarely take my computer out of the house, so the size and weight of the 16" MBP didn't bother me. Given that a refurbished M1 16" MBP with 16 GB of RAM and a 1 TB SSD was only $280 more than the M2 MBA I was considering, I decided to go for it.

I have absolutely no regrets. The screen is so big that I haven't yet felt a need to get an external monitor. I've used the extra ports more than I expected. The processor is more than powerful enough for my needs. The 2019 iMac was fine, but the new MBP is much faster, especially for exporting videos I edit in Adobe Premiere.

Which brings up my final point: What you use your computer for sounds almost identical to what I use mine for. I, too, like to keep my computers for four or five years. Bear in mind that my four-year-old iMac was still perfectly adequate for what I do, and I probably would have continued to use it until Apple stopped supporting Intel-based Macs. Even my 2015 MBP was still fine for email, web browsing, and basic productivity apps like MS Office. As someone who used to buy high-end tech gear in general in the belief that it would future-proof me or give me capabilities that I might want or need over the next few years, I finally realized that I'd spent many thousands of dollars in my lifetime for features and power I never used. I decided to switch to the approach a good friend of mine has always used: figure out the minimum I need now, and add a little more power/features/whatever. If, a couple years down the line, it turns out that I'm doing new things that require more whatever, I can sell what I have and then buy what I need.

Yes, an M2 MBP might give you another year or two of use over an M1, and it will have better resale value -- but you'll pay more for it up front. The M1 MBP has far more power than I need (I read and watched several reviews in which the reviewers threw everything they could at it -- far more than I ever would -- and it never slowed down or got hot), so why would I spend more money for an M2 MBP with 32 GB of RAM, when I'm unlikely to overly tax my M1 during its useful lifespan? So what if the M1 is "old tech"?

Anyway, good luck with whatever you decide to get!
Thanks! Yeah, I don't think it's worth the extra almost $600 for the refurbished M2 MBP (or $950 for a new M2 MBP) for what I do. I considered getting into more AE work, but honestly it drives me nuts and if anything I should be writing more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leifp

scrambledwonder

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 4, 2006
314
18
Berkeley, CA
If you compare Apples to Apples, that M1 MBP 14 with 16gb/1tb will outperform the similarly spec'd M2 MBA 15, which will cost you $1899. Add to that the fact that the MBP 14 has a 120hz miniLED screen, three Thunderbolt 4 ports, HDMI port, and SDXC card slot, you are getting an extraordinary value for only 3 oz more weight in your backpack.

PS - where did you find the 10c/16c version (with 1tb) for $1575? I thought I got a great deal on the 8c/14c version for $1550 two weeks ago...
Amazon refurbished through Electronics Basket.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dalestrauss

scrambledwonder

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 4, 2006
314
18
Berkeley, CA
You object to my statement that "You do not mention RAM, which will be very relevant over the life of any new box," but that comment was made in response to the original post, in which RAM had not yet been mentioned.

I did not say "that the best you're going to do on an Apple Silicon Mac with 16GB of RAM is to get it to function." What I actually said was:
-----------
16 GB RAM will be workable thanks to Mac OS magic but will be limiting over 2023-2028 5 year life cycle.

That described work reasonably fits in 16 GB RAM today. However it is a big mistake to plan for today when the life cycle of the new box is the next five years, not yesterday. RAM needs always increase; always.
----------
The key word in my commentary was (future) limiting. My experience suggests that many, perhaps most, workflows - specifically including where the OP described being at today extrapolated to where the OP will likely be 4 years from now - will likely be being limited by 16 GB RAM. Not barely functional, but limited.

Let me be crystal clear: per the OP 16 GB RAM apparently works fine for him today, and 16 GB should also work fine for him on any Apple SoC today. But based on history I lived and anyone can research, RAM needs always increase over time. Very simply, that means 16 GB will become limiting at some point; IMO 2-3 years.

The Mac OS will allow function but the 16 GB RAM chosen in 2023 will be limiting to the operation of the multi-thousand-dollar computer - - despite that multi-thousand-dollar computer still being an otherwise fine tool. My 2016 MBP with 16 GB RAM followed exactly that path, with no changes in apps/OS except upgrades.

IMO that would be bad 2023 decision making, because I do not think that a new multi-thousand-dollar computer should intentionally be limited in 2 years by a RAM decision made when building the original box. Obviously any 2023 box will be limited relative to more tech-advanced 2025 boxes; that is fully expected and OK. But to intentionally and unnecessarily cause a box to become RAM-lame (yet functional thanks to Mac OS) in 2 years IMO represents poor planning, unless:

There is a valid alternate analytical view based on short life cycles that some follow for various good reasons. One can spend less now, meeting today's needs only like you have been focusing on and then replace the box in 2 years. Makes total sense for some, especially for large entities. Such folks intend to deal with things like increasing RAM demands with a new box in 2 years, easy-peasy.

It seems to me that the OP was not intending a short life cycle, and my comments have been made accordingly.

IMO M2 Max MBP versus M2 Pro MBP both at the same 32 GB RAM (minimum) are both acceptable choices for the OP, depending upon what the actual street costing gets to be versus the performance benefits the Max provides (OP's analytical/financial choice). But for $200 more today, 2 years from now the Max's additional GPU cores and twice the memory bandwidth may well matter to someone who (today) does "some graphic design and video editing. ...some work in After Effects. ...mostly use my Mac with a monitor and peripherals. My current MacBook Pro works fine. Render times aren't great..."

My whole point here is that tech evolves (hardware, OS, apps) and we should plan accordingly when building hardware for 4+ year life cycles.

Again, what I actually said was: ...likely put an M1 MBP unable to use the Mac OS of 5 years from now.

Never have I suggested "dropping support for M1 Pro and M1 Max." You and I agree here. My last two MBPs went 6 and 7 (and still working) years, and I never did experience loss of support (inability to upgrade to the newest OS is not dropping support in my lexicon). I upgraded the still fully operational 2016 MBP to an M2 MBP A) because it evolved to be RAM-lame at 16 GB and B) because I use Apple-ecosystem-wide features enabled by Mac OS Sonoma that (still supported) Monterey does not facilitate.
Hey Allen and Yub, I appreciate both of you taking so much time to think about this. Like, really, I'm not being sarcastic.
 
Last edited:

scrambledwonder

macrumors 6502
Original poster
Dec 4, 2006
314
18
Berkeley, CA
I have both and using both too… The M1Pro is my own, it has 32 GB ram, the M2Pro is from work, it has 16 GB ram.

99% of the time, I don’t feel any difference at all, two machines run identical.

In terms of RAM usage, 16 GB does use swap a lot, from time to time I’d run activity manager to see memory usage, I’d day 2-3/10 times, it used swap, when I, say have all the apps for work (mail messenger calendar and etc), plus a few Figma tabs, it is guaranteed it will use swap, or say, when I use it for automation tasks that require a lot of ram, for example, if I convert 1000 raw photos to DNG in Lightroom, or run batch Photoshop actions with a few pictures, swap will definitely kick in, and the extra ram will help, though the M2Pro uses swap, it’s slower, but it’s not noticeable slower, I can wait.

A benefit of the M2Pro is the connectivity as well, it allows 160 mhz, which means you can get closer to 1 gigabits connection, my M1Pro can only peak around 650 mbps, but my M2Pro can peak around 850 mbps, do you have a fast internet connection? Is the speed important for you? TBH, 650 mbps is plenty fast for most things.

M2Pro “seems” to run warmer than the M1Pro, my M1Pro only gets warm after I ran some intensive tasks, but M2Pro is warm even when after a conference call.

TBH, day to day, I don’t feel there is any significant difference at all between the two machines, if I were in your shoes, I’d pick the M1Pro and use the left over money to get something else… Is M1Pro with 32 GB ram not an option? That’s be my number one choice.
The RAM problem (maybe a good band name?) is interesting. According to our own Mac Rumors, there isn't a big difference between 16 and 32 for most tasks RIGHT NOW. In the future, who knows? Maybe AI 3D 8k video generators will need 32+GB. Maybe rolling blackouts will require 4GB of RAM on a super efficient hand-cranked laptop.

However I believe that Apple know what they're doing when they spec Pro machines with 16GB RAM. IE they know that thanks to fancy-pants memory swapping most users won't need more than 16GB within the next few years. I also believe they spec Pro machines to have a 2-4 year lifespan for most "pro" workflows.

I can get a refurb M1 14-inch MBP with 1TB and 32GB for $2229. The refurb M2 14-inch MBP with 1TB and 32GB is $2459. So if i'm going for 32GB RAM, the M2 is the best value for money. But it's almost a thousand dollars more than the M1 with 16GB. That's significant.

Also we should be aware of Apple's "might as well" spec bump ladder that Marques Brownlee describes. If we get on the ladder we end up getting the M2 MAX that Allen wants us to get and we've spent twice as much as we set out to spend 😂! And hell might as well get the Studio Display, too! (For real though I spent some time with the Studio display at Best Buy and it blew me away.)

If I didn't have a kid and I wasn't paying Southern California rent I'd follow Allen's advice. But I do and I am, so I'm limited (maybe also limited in imagination, I donno). I think the M1 Pro or M2 Air will work well for me for a long time. If I somehow get a bug up my butt and start shooting tons of 4k video and trying to build a video production company (unlikely, but you never know), then I can run whatever I get until it slows me down. And by that point I'll be generating enough income to justify the M2 MAX (or M3 MAX??).
 
Last edited:
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.