Don't know if it sucks that bad... but I'll miss Powerbook definitely.weldon said:just voicing my displeasure I think the name stinks. Even PowerBook XP would have been better.
Mitthrawnuruodo said:I like the name.
Cannot wait to see a 12" ordinary MacBook.
mikeyredk said:where is the firewire 800 port! its gone
Good pointGimmeSlack12 said:...I like Powerbook better too, but I'm sure MacBook Pro is a bit more self-explanatory to the non-Mac user.
dops7107 said:That's pretty unforgiveable. A downgrade? At $2500??
danny_w said:And I wonder how long before the 4-5x faster claim is debunked? And 2-3x faster for the iMac? Don't anybody believe it. I'd say 0.5-1.5x faster for iMac, 2-3x faster for MacBook. Intel benchmarks are notoriously offbase.
alec said:we got new laptops. thats all that matters. they could call it the nazi sympathizer swastika computer and id still buy it
How is it strange? I think 900 is actually a stranger res. than 960 because it's not divisible by 8.MacRumorUser said:Looks like they've sorted out the screen, notice that it's 1440x900 and not the strange 960 res of the G4 1.67
stonyc said:Don't know if it sucks that bad... but I'll miss Powerbook definitely.
No more P-P-P-Powerbook... hello, M-M-MacBook.
HiRez said:How is it strange? I think 900 is actually a stranger res. than 960 because it's not divisible by 8.