Give me more power over thinner and lighter any day.

Last edited:
Give me more power over thinner and lighter any day.
I guess Apple have re-hired Ive's agency if they want to make their laptops thinner again... I guess they didn't learn last time..
Disagree on thinness. It's already quite thin compared to most laptops. There's the Air for that.
Being a "pro" machine, it needs more power and features. And I think Apple is on this line, after all they made a non-Pro Pro (on its second gen now, so it must sell well) but no Pro Air, if that makes sense.
Not right now, but LGs 13" panels are already shipping (to Dell and Apple), and it would be strange if 14" and 16" panels aren't close to coming of production lines, well in time for Apples next MBP update.“Compared to current MacBook Pro models with mini-LED screens, benefits of OLED technology would include increased brightness”
There are no commercially available OLED screens of the size and quality needed that will be brighter than what Apple is using now. I could be unaware of one, but I’ve looked. Maybe for much higher costs, if there is one.
Either a thinner and lighter Pro or a proper display in an Air, idc which.Does anyone really want a thinner Pro?
And keep the ports as they are.Give me more power over thinner and lighter any day.
Those panels (used in iPad Pros) are matching the brightness of what Apple is using in laptops. My original comment was simply pointing out that the article’s mentioning that OLED are brighter is not necessarily accurate. If Apple switches to OLED screens in MacBook Pro models in 2026, there is no guarantee the screens will be brighter than LED screens Apple might use instead.Not right now, but LGs 13" panels are already shipping (to Dell and Apple), and it would be strange if 14" and 16" panels aren't close to coming of production lines, well in time for Apples next MBP update.
I've seen these claims and know how they are able to get there, the only problem is to get that much battery life requires a usage scenario (or more correctly stated non-usage senario) that no one that is actually using the thing will do. I get about 3 hours or so usage on my '21 MBP under light usage of writing a paper or grading assignments using a web browser before I have to plug it up or turn it off. If I am doing photo editing or working in lightroom it burns through it even faster. A thinner MBP will have to come with less battery, couple that with a more powerful processor that would be used when doing process-intensive work would not last as long. More power = more better regardless of how you use it. Give me more power (battery) over thinner any day of the week. Otherwise, we will all have to start carrying around portable battery packs just to make it through the day, and that will equate to more weight than just having a bigger/better battery inside the laptop.As long as they have this OLED redesign by 2029, I'm good. I spec'd my 14" M3 Max 16c/40c 64GB to last that long.
I mean, the M4 Pro was just benchmarked as the fastest Apple Silicon yet (until M4 Max is benched), with 22-24 hours of battery life depending which size you get. By 2026 TSMC is expected to be on the 1.6nm process node, which is going to be insanely efficient compared to our current 3nm chips. I wouldn't be surprised if they pull off, by far, the fastest Macs ever with nearly a day of battery life that are a full third thinner.
Furthermore, I think OLED assemblies are thinner, and they use less battery. So combined, it makes perfect sense that they would start moving thinner again in 2026, because they could do so without compromise. Most people don't care if their laptop has more than 24 hours of battery life, lol. I just hope they never try that thinner keyboard crap again.
I won't be upgrading my M2 Mac until we get OLED and maybe Face ID in that notch or a Dynamic Island.
As for a redesign, I imagine a thinner design is all we'll get once OLED arrives, and OLED is long overdue as well.