Did Apple announced A18 Pro capable of Thunderbolt? I think iPhone 16 Pro only reaches USB 3 10GB/s speed.The A18 Pro also supports thunderbolt
Did Apple announced A18 Pro capable of Thunderbolt? I think iPhone 16 Pro only reaches USB 3 10GB/s speed.The A18 Pro also supports thunderbolt
Ah right you are, it's not thunderbolt, only 10G usb. Bummer.Did Apple announced A18 Pro capable of Thunderbolt? I think iPhone 16 Pro only reaches USB 3 10GB/s speed.
But again, how many potential buyers of this laptop need Thunderbolt (or even know what it is)?Ah right you are, it's not thunderbolt, only 10G usb. Bummer.
Agreed, probably zero, almost posted that this is a perfect replacement for the original 12" MacBook and that never had thunderbolt either.But again, how many potential buyers of this laptop need Thunderbolt (or even know what it is)?
I don't expect to see many, if any, "power user" specs in this laptop. Number one, it would cannibalize their sales of MacBook Air/Pro, and number two, power users aren't the target demographic. Obviously I don't know any more than the next schmuck and am just guessing, but I anticipate that it's going to be a pretty basic/stripped down model.
The Chromebook I used in school currently costs 328$ (converted to USD) at Elkjøp (Scandinavian Best Buy). Maybe even less because they bought them in bulk.It could be a perfect competitor for the Chromebook??
This rumor about a ~$600 MacBook has caught my attention. I think it’s fair to say that an A18 Pro chip is strong enough to run macOS but why would Apple make that? The chip would burn out from too much multitasking then.
That’s where iPadOS comes in. The software limits the user so it can’t burn out, the battery life would be huge, it’s a 12.9” screen which is iPad like and I think it would be lighter than the iPad and Magic Keyboard combo. Plus, Apple has been making iPadOS more Mac like for years now. It wouldn’t be a touch screen either, which keeps costs down. It could be a perfect competitor for the Chromebook??
I personally would buy this as I love iPadOS but I don’t like the iPad and Magic Keyboard combo. It would be at least double the battery life of a iPad now I think, which would be huge to me. Would anyone else want this though?
Yeah the idea that Apple put a "Mac" chip like the M1 in the iPad pro is ridiculous and shows how marketing brainwashes people who don't know any better. The M1 is an iPad chip, the A14X with Thunderbolt support et a couple of minor tweaks, that was just first used on a Mac and then put back where it was originally going to go anyway, in the iPad pro... The only real Mac chips are the M1/2/3/4 Pro and Max, and even then those are directly derived from the iPad chips. Macs have been running on iPad chips since 2020 and now will be running on iPhone chips too.It will likely be running MacOS and would finally kill the stupid view that the "Mx" SoCs are "Mac" SoCs. I still think that iPadOS 26 clamshell device is an interesting thought whatever it will be called.
There's a huge advantage to using A18 Pro. The die size is about 30% smaller than M3, which is much cheaper to produce.
I like the idea as I’m one of those weirdos who prefer iPadOS. I just don’t see it happening. It'll confuse customers if the device is marketed as a MacBook. They'll wonder why their Mac applications can’t work on their new MacBook.This rumor about a ~$600 MacBook has caught my attention. I think it’s fair to say that an A18 Pro chip is strong enough to run macOS but why would Apple make that? The chip would burn out from too much multitasking then.
That’s where iPadOS comes in. The software limits the user so it can’t burn out, the battery life would be huge, it’s a 12.9” screen which is iPad like and I think it would be lighter than the iPad and Magic Keyboard combo. Plus, Apple has been making iPadOS more Mac like for years now. It wouldn’t be a touch screen either, which keeps costs down. It could be a perfect competitor for the Chromebook??
I personally would buy this as I love iPadOS but I don’t like the iPad and Magic Keyboard combo. It would be at least double the battery life of a iPad now I think, which would be huge to me. Would anyone else want this though?
Apple still owns the "iBook" moniker if they want to relaunch it as a distinct product line.I like the idea as I’m one of those weirdos who prefer iPadOS. I just don’t see it happening. It'll confuse customers if the device is marketed as a MacBook. They'll wonder why their Mac applications can’t work on their new MacBook.
There’s a sizeable “premium” Chromebook market emerging. In Canada, they can range up to $800 CAD, compared to 1250 CAD education pricing for the base MBA. So there’s definitely some potential overlap there for a cheaper Mac.The Chromebook I used in school currently costs 328$ (converted to USD) at Elkjøp (Scandinavian Best Buy). Maybe even less because they bought them in bulk.
How would Apple attract schools with a reported 599$ price tag? Heavy price cuts for bulk orders?
To be fair this is coming from someone who went to an underfunded Norwegian private school, so I'm probably biased.
The Chromebook I used in school currently costs 328$ (converted to USD) at Elkjøp (Scandinavian Best Buy). Maybe even less because they bought them in bulk.
How would Apple attract schools with a reported 599$ price tag? Heavy price cuts for bulk orders?
To be fair this is coming from someone who went to an underfunded Norwegian private school, so I'm probably biased.
I do agree with you but the M1 was officially launched on the Macbook Air and MBP 13 running Mac OS like you said, with massive improvements across the board over the previous Intel chips, thats why M chips where/are referred as Mac chips.Yeah the idea that Apple put a "Mac" chip like the M1 in the iPad pro is ridiculous and shows how marketing brainwashes people who don't know any better. The M1 is an iPad chip, the A14X with Thunderbolt support et a couple of minor tweaks, that was just first used on a Mac and then put back where it was originally going to go anyway, in the iPad pro... The only real Mac chips are the M1/2/3/4 Pro and Max, and even then those are directly derived from the iPad chips. Macs have been running on iPad chips since 2020 and now will be running on iPhone chips too.
Nearly all core SoC architectures comes from the Ax chips anyway. I saw in a recent MR article that one of the listed flaws of iPad Pro M4 was that got the M4 Soc before the Mac. Marketing brainwashed indeed. I expect better from MR authors and forum members, but alas.Yeah the idea that Apple put a "Mac" chip like the M1 in the iPad pro is ridiculous and shows how marketing brainwashes people who don't know any better. The M1 is an iPad chip, the A14X with Thunderbolt support et a couple of minor tweaks, that was just first used on a Mac and then put back where it was originally going to go anyway, in the iPad pro... The only real Mac chips are the M1/2/3/4 Pro and Max, and even then those are directly derived from the iPad chips. Macs have been running on iPad chips since 2020 and now will be running on iPhone chips too.