Make sure you have the latest version... I didn't change the version numbers, so just delete any current copy you have and download it again. Then, create a new USB install drive.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
macOS 10.12 Sierra Unsupported Macs Thread
- Thread starter redheeler
- WikiPost WikiPost
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
- Status
The dropping of these Macs comes at a time when I thought Apple under Tim Cook had actually done something right. This kind of planned obsolescence was common previously, with attempts such as blocking 32-bit EFI and GMA Macs from Mountain Lion that would actually see better performance running it, Snow Leopard going Intel only and casting off Quad G5 workhorses that were only 4 years old, an arbitrary Firewire requirement in Tiger, and needlessly dropping a bunch of older Macs from MacOS 9.2 that ran fine in 9.1.
It is still reassuring that at least some Macs running the latest version of OS X without any hacks will be approaching 9 years old.
I doubt many owners of older hardware would be willing to accept a paid upgrade easily, and Apple probably knows this. As it is there are those reluctant to upgrade from Snow Leopard or another older version for free.
I've seen people selling their Mac Pros to build Hackintoshes. Well, I've done the math, comparing a fully loaded Mac Pro 2009 (2x6-core) vs the best Core i7 (6700K) Hackintosh you can build:
- The Mac Pro 2009 (with 2x6-core) can be sold for 1.5x the price of building the top-end Hackintosh. In other words, if you sell today and use some of the cash to build a top-end Hackintosh, you'll "earn" 0.5x the price of a Hackintosh in "spare cash/profit" by selling the Mac Pro.
- The Hackintosh has 75% of the multi-core CPU Geekbench performance that a fully loaded Mac Pro 2009 has.
- It's a lot of hassle to build the hackintosh and sell the old Mac. And the hackintosh is uglier, risks being noisy, and has external WiFi antennas all over the place. There's loads of work setting up drivers and making sure every little detail works without crashes etc. And there's issues with Thunderbolt and USB 3 working in Hackintoshes, etc. All of those things will mature over the coming years.
- So switching from a Mac Pro 2009 to the best Core i7 Hackintosh today is basically like getting a tiny bit of cash in return for a 25% drop in CPU performance, and lots of other drawbacks and hassle.
- More importantly: That tiny bit of spare cash after the machine-exchange won't be able to build a good machine-upgrade in a few years, when you inevitably need a new machine for more performance.
- Furthermore: PC parts lose their value instantly. You won't even be able to GIVE THEM AWAY FOR FREE in a few years when you inevitably want a CPU+motherboard upgrade, when a brand new Intel CPU platform exists.
So, here's a smarter way of handling Apple's phasing-out of hardware support. This method minimizes hassle, maximizes performance, and nets the same amount of cash in the end:
- Keep the Mac Pro 2009.
- Upgrade it to firmware 5.1 (fake "Mac Pro 2010").
- Enjoy the hassle-free OS X installations (until some future OS blocks even the 5.1/MP2010 model, which will take a very long time, unless Apple wants to piss people off; and even then, you can start hacking on your Mac Pro at that point, to install new OS versions there anyway).
- Run your current Mac Pro machine into the ground and enjoy its speed.
- When the time comes for an upgrade, you will still be able to sell the Mac Pro 2009 since there's always a market for a fast Mac Pro... and here's the cool thing: When you sell it in the future, you'll get less money than today, but the final price you get for selling your monster-Mac Pro 2009 in the future will probably be about the same as the amount of SPARE CASH you'd have if you were selling today and immediately buying a Hackintosh.
- In other words, by waiting, you still have the same amount of "extra" cash in your hands in a few years when you inevitably need a NEW build/performance upgrade.
- And for those thinking they can just sell their Hackintosh instead if they were to build one today: That's not really possible. You can never sell your old Hackintosh PC parts, because nobody wants old "top-end" PC parts. Gamers want the latest parts, and grandmas want the cheapest budget parts. So buying a Hackintosh today is an instant loss since they don't retain any value.
- So regardless of which path you take, you'll have the same amount of cash in your hands in 5 years.
- And you will definitely want to build a new Hackintosh in a few years, since it will be way more powerful (we're talking 10-12 cores per CPU) than anything you can build today. But by waiting you get to enjoy the performance of your current Mac Pro 2009, and you'll STILL get the exact same amount of "spare cash" leftovers in the future from selling your old Mac Pro 2009.
- So wait, and enjoy the machine and the fact that it's faster than every Core i7 hackintosh available today. And then sell it and build a monster hackintosh in 5-10 years, which you were inevitably going to do anyway.
I hope I explained it clearly enough that someone else will understand what I'm saying. I don't have time to rewrite the post.
- The Mac Pro 2009 (with 2x6-core) can be sold for 1.5x the price of building the top-end Hackintosh. In other words, if you sell today and use some of the cash to build a top-end Hackintosh, you'll "earn" 0.5x the price of a Hackintosh in "spare cash/profit" by selling the Mac Pro.
- The Hackintosh has 75% of the multi-core CPU Geekbench performance that a fully loaded Mac Pro 2009 has.
- It's a lot of hassle to build the hackintosh and sell the old Mac. And the hackintosh is uglier, risks being noisy, and has external WiFi antennas all over the place. There's loads of work setting up drivers and making sure every little detail works without crashes etc. And there's issues with Thunderbolt and USB 3 working in Hackintoshes, etc. All of those things will mature over the coming years.
- So switching from a Mac Pro 2009 to the best Core i7 Hackintosh today is basically like getting a tiny bit of cash in return for a 25% drop in CPU performance, and lots of other drawbacks and hassle.
- More importantly: That tiny bit of spare cash after the machine-exchange won't be able to build a good machine-upgrade in a few years, when you inevitably need a new machine for more performance.
- Furthermore: PC parts lose their value instantly. You won't even be able to GIVE THEM AWAY FOR FREE in a few years when you inevitably want a CPU+motherboard upgrade, when a brand new Intel CPU platform exists.
So, here's a smarter way of handling Apple's phasing-out of hardware support. This method minimizes hassle, maximizes performance, and nets the same amount of cash in the end:
- Keep the Mac Pro 2009.
- Upgrade it to firmware 5.1 (fake "Mac Pro 2010").
- Enjoy the hassle-free OS X installations (until some future OS blocks even the 5.1/MP2010 model, which will take a very long time, unless Apple wants to piss people off; and even then, you can start hacking on your Mac Pro at that point, to install new OS versions there anyway).
- Run your current Mac Pro machine into the ground and enjoy its speed.
- When the time comes for an upgrade, you will still be able to sell the Mac Pro 2009 since there's always a market for a fast Mac Pro... and here's the cool thing: When you sell it in the future, you'll get less money than today, but the final price you get for selling your monster-Mac Pro 2009 in the future will probably be about the same as the amount of SPARE CASH you'd have if you were selling today and immediately buying a Hackintosh.
- In other words, by waiting, you still have the same amount of "extra" cash in your hands in a few years when you inevitably need a NEW build/performance upgrade.
- And for those thinking they can just sell their Hackintosh instead if they were to build one today: That's not really possible. You can never sell your old Hackintosh PC parts, because nobody wants old "top-end" PC parts. Gamers want the latest parts, and grandmas want the cheapest budget parts. So buying a Hackintosh today is an instant loss since they don't retain any value.
- So regardless of which path you take, you'll have the same amount of cash in your hands in 5 years.
- And you will definitely want to build a new Hackintosh in a few years, since it will be way more powerful (we're talking 10-12 cores per CPU) than anything you can build today. But by waiting you get to enjoy the performance of your current Mac Pro 2009, and you'll STILL get the exact same amount of "spare cash" leftovers in the future from selling your old Mac Pro 2009.
- So wait, and enjoy the machine and the fact that it's faster than every Core i7 hackintosh available today. And then sell it and build a monster hackintosh in 5-10 years, which you were inevitably going to do anyway.
I hope I explained it clearly enough that someone else will understand what I'm saying. I don't have time to rewrite the post.
Last edited:
I've seen people selling their Mac Pros to build Hackintoshes. Well, I've done the math, comparing a fully loaded Mac Pro 2009 (2x6-core) vs the best Core i7 (6700K) Hackintosh you can build:
- The Mac Pro 2009 (with 2x6-core) can be sold for 1.5x the price of building the top-end Hackintosh. In other words, if you sell today and use some of the cash to build a top-end Hackintosh, you'll "earn" 0.5x the price of a Hackintosh in "spare cash/profit" by selling the Mac Pro.
- The Hackintosh has 75% of the multi-core CPU Geekbench performance that a fully loaded Mac Pro 2009 has.
- It's a lot of hassle to build the hackintosh and sell the old Mac. And the hackintosh is uglier, risks being noisy, and has external WiFi antennas all over the place. There's loads of work setting up drivers and making sure every little detail works without crashes etc. And there's issues with Thunderbolt and USB 3 working in Hackintoshes, etc. All of those things will mature over the coming years.
- So switching from a Mac Pro 2009 to the best Core i7 Hackintosh today is basically like getting a tiny bit of cash in return for a 25% drop in CPU performance, and lots of other drawbacks and hassle.
- More importantly: That tiny bit of spare cash after the machine-exchange won't be able to build a good machine-upgrade in a few years, when you inevitably need a new machine for more performance.
- Furthermore: PC parts lose their value instantly. You won't even be able to GIVE THEM AWAY FOR FREE in a few years when you inevitably want a CPU+motherboard upgrade, when a brand new Intel CPU platform exists.
So, here's a smarter way of handling Apple's phasing-out of hardware support. This method minimizes hassle, maximizes performance, and nets the same amount of cash in the end:
- Keep the Mac Pro 2009.
- Upgrade it to firmware 5.1 (fake "Mac Pro 2010").
- Enjoy the hassle-free OS X installations (until some future OS blocks even the 5.1/MP2010 model, which will take a very long time, unless Apple wants to piss people off; and even then, you can start hacking on your Mac Pro at that point, to install new OS versions there anyway).
- Run your current Mac Pro machine into the ground and enjoy its speed.
- When the time comes for an upgrade, you will still be able to sell the Mac Pro 2009 since there's always a market for a fast Mac Pro... and here's the cool thing: When you sell it in the future, you'll get less money than today, but the final price you get for selling your monster-Mac Pro 2009 in the future will probably be about the same as the amount of SPARE CASH you'd have if you were selling today and immediately buying a Hackintosh.
- In other words, by waiting, you still have the same amount of "extra" cash in your hands in a few years when you inevitably need a NEW build/performance upgrade.
- And for those thinking they can just sell their Hackintosh instead if they were to build one today: That's not really possible. You can never sell your old Hackintosh PC parts, because nobody wants old "top-end" PC parts. Gamers want the latest parts, and grandmas want the cheapest budget parts. So buying a Hackintosh today is an instant loss since they don't retain any value.
- So regardless of which path you take, you'll have the same amount of cash in your hands in 5 years.
- And you will definitely want to build a new Hackintosh in a few years, since it will be way more powerful (we're talking 10-12 cores per CPU) than anything you can build today. But by waiting you get to enjoy the performance of your current Mac Pro 2009, and you'll STILL get the exact same amount of "spare cash" leftovers in the future from selling your old Mac Pro 2009.
- So wait, and enjoy the machine and the fact that it's faster than every Core i7 hackintosh available today. And then sell it and build a monster hackintosh in 5-10 years, which you were inevitably going to do anyway.
I hope I explained it clearly enough that someone else will understand what I'm saying. I don't have time to rewrite the post.
Dude that's a great idea
Yep, no wifi for me on MacBook5.2 (ITS A MACBOOK5.2 not 5.1 sorry!)
Early 2009 White Polycarbonate. Every seems to work.
I did the same thing when I switch the Early 08 board for an Early 09. No wifi for me
Early 2009 White Polycarbonate. Every seems to work.
I did the same thing when I switch the Early 08 board for an Early 09. No wifi for me
Another satisfied customer of dosdude1.
Yes, your updated tool worked. I'm now posting this message with my MBP 5,1 running Sierra.
Yes, USB and WiFi also works.
Party time.
Yep, no wifi for me on MacBook5.2 (ITS A MACBOOK5.2 not 5.1 sorry!)
Early 2009 White Polycarbonate. Every seems to work.
I did the same thing when I switch the Early 08 board for an Early 09. No wifi for me
I'd say we'll be moving to external wifi
An update: I just ran the post installation tool only on the already installed Sierra OS.
[doublepost=1466289418][/doublepost]
All I did was to create the USB flash dive using the latest tool by dosdude1. After than, then booted up from the USB flash drive and just ran the post installation tool. After that, rebooted into the MBP SSD drive and it's running normally.
I already had Sierra installed on the MBP SSD.
Hope this helps.
[doublepost=1466290236][/doublepost]A note to dosdude1;
After using the updated tool of yours, this time I did see that I was able (if I want) to install Sierra onto the MBP SSD.
A great many thanks to you.
[doublepost=1466289418][/doublepost]
Hello Activa66;
All I did was to create the USB flash dive using the latest tool by dosdude1. After than, then booted up from the USB flash drive and just ran the post installation tool. After that, rebooted into the MBP SSD drive and it's running normally.
I already had Sierra installed on the MBP SSD.
Hope this helps.
[doublepost=1466290236][/doublepost]A note to dosdude1;
After using the updated tool of yours, this time I did see that I was able (if I want) to install Sierra onto the MBP SSD.
A great many thanks to you.
Hi Herfindale;
For me, the patching files part took about 15 to 20, maybe 25 minutes when creating the USB flash drive.
For me, the patching files part took about 15 to 20, maybe 25 minutes when creating the USB flash drive.
Nah I'm not doing that. If DosDude1 can tell me please, the name of his wifi chip in his Factory MacBook5.2, wifi cards seem cheap on eBay.
Mine is my test computer. So I'll probably just use the USB wifi chip I bought for my hackintosh
I use Atheros AR5BXB72, all working great.
P.S. @dosdude1, how can I get Apple Mouse working on bluetooth? What kext should I use? My Mac seen my mouse, but can't work with it.
Gonna grab one of these then, thanks @Herfindale
http://www.ebay.com/itm/IBM-Atheros...976162?hash=item27b3e6dd62:g:FXgAAMXQVT9TFvlV
http://www.ebay.com/itm/IBM-Atheros...976162?hash=item27b3e6dd62:g:FXgAAMXQVT9TFvlV
Yeah, just make an install drive and run the post-install app.
@dosdude1 you're awesome! Posting this from macOS Sierra on my mid-2009 iMac. Full compatibility, no issues whatsoever. Shame on Apple for artificially crippling it when the hardware is still perfectly capable. Next question...how will updating to beta 2 work? Can we just install from the App Store as usual or will it break it?
More than likely, you'll be able to install the update normally, then re-patch the install using the post-install app.
Hi all, I have a mac mini 3,1 (early 2009) and have tried running the latest patcher by dosdude1 but I still get the 'NO' symbol about 2/3 of the way when I boot off the external drive. Any ideas?
EDIT: I ran the patcher on a second internal partition and replaced the PlatformSupport.plist with the one provided on the first page. Now I am able to get the loading bar to 100% but it seems frozen there.
EDIT: I ran the patcher on a second internal partition and replaced the PlatformSupport.plist with the one provided on the first page. Now I am able to get the loading bar to 100% but it seems frozen there.
Last edited: