So few words can change a whole reality, like:"return true;"
I'll try it a 3rd time doing that.Yes it did. Haven't you tried yet?
I didn't want to try a 3rd time and have it fail..but it worked.Yes it did. Haven't you tried yet?
Haha Where did you even come up with that logic Colin!? Thats Hilarious !Hard disk is failing, it can't complete fsck. Get a new hard disk or SSD, preferably.
Come up with that logic? I didn't. When OS X shows the thick progress bar on boot like that, it either means it's updating firmware, or running fsck. If it fails and cannot complete fsck successfully, it will stop and shut the system off. As for your other rude and ignorant statement, I actually DID have the legacy video drivers included in very early versions of Mojave Patcher, but they were causing issues for a lot of people in the installation environment, so I removed them. Also, unless a video card has an EFI-compatible ROM, you WILL NOT get a boot screen, regardless of what drivers are present in the OS.I'll try it a 3rd time doing that.
I didn't want to try a 3rd time and have it fail..but it worked.
[automerge]1576944500[/automerge]
Haha Where did you even come up with that logic Colin!? Thats Hilarious !
Instead you should make your usb creator include older amd kext files so we don't have to boot blindly with pc cards how about that logic for ya. Thats what i have to do manually and it works.
?Come up with that logic? I didn't. When OS X shows the thick progress bar on boot like that, it either means it's updating firmware, or running fsck. If it fails and cannot complete fsck successfully, it will stop and shut the system off. As for your other rude and ignorant statement, I actually DID have the legacy video drivers included in very early versions of Mojave Patcher, but they were causing issues for a lot of people in the installation environment, so I removed them. Also, unless a video card has an EFI-compatible ROM, you WILL NOT get a boot screen, regardless of what drivers are present in the OS.
Ya ok totally NOT the case though. I remember your early builds and they worked perfect for me. Also, unless a video card has an EFI-compatible ROM, you WILL NOT get a boot screen, regardless of what drivers are present in the OS. What i'm talking about is the actual system installer being visible once it's done booting.Come up with that logic? I didn't. When OS X shows the thick progress bar on boot like that, it either means it's updating firmware, or running fsck. If it fails and cannot complete fsck successfully, it will stop and shut the system off. As for your other rude and ignorant statement, I actually DID have the legacy video drivers included in very early versions of Mojave Patcher, but they were causing issues for a lot of people in the installation environment, so I removed them. Also, unless a video card has an EFI-compatible ROM, you WILL NOT get a boot screen, regardless of what drivers are present in the OS.
What i'm talking about is the actual system installer being visible once it's done booting.
Ya ok totally NOT the case though. I remember your early builds and they worked perfect for me. Also, unless a video card has an EFI-compatible ROM, you WILL NOT get a boot screen, regardless of what drivers are present in the OS. What i'm talking about is the actual system installer being visible once it's done booting.
What i'm talking about is the actual system installer being visible once it's done booting. It used to work before but Colin removed it, like he said.Unless you have EFI-compatible video card, the system installer after the initial boot screen won't be visible either. I have MacPro 3,1 with non-EFI but metal-compatible video card, the system installer was hidden completely during my Catalina installation using the Install to Machine method. Nothing was visible until the login screen and that will continue to be case for each system update going forward unless I upgrade the video. For Mojave, I had to use MacBook Pro 5,1(with its EFI compatible but non-metal video card) along with a boot USB drive and Firewire in order to install the system on the MacPro 3,1.
It is simple you want to see the system installer, get a EFI-compatible video card. What occurred in a earlier build due to the presence of legacy video driver in the installer is immaterial. This is the status quo moving forward.
What i'm talking about is the actual system installer being visible once it's done booting. It used to work before but Colin removed it, like he said.
Your cMP5.1 will run Mojave natively ( so no patching) if you fit a METAL graphics card like the GTX680. Have a good read of this thread as it is also best to update the ROM to 144.0.0.0.0.Hey there,
I am still struggling with myself if and how I want to move on with my early 2009 macpro 5.1.
at the moment I am running my mac with the Os 10.11.6.
I have two questions can I directly setup Mojave with the mojave patcher.
And secondly will Adobe Indesign work as I have a NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 graficscard.
thank you in advance for any help.
Mac Pro 5,1 is supported by Mojave. No need for patchesHey there,
I am still struggling with myself if and how I want to move on with my early 2009 macpro 5.1.
at the moment I am running my mac with the Os 10.11.6.
I have two questions can I directly setup Mojave with the mojave patcher.
And secondly will Adobe Indesign work as I have a NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 graficscard.
thank you in advance for any help.
I'm running El Capitan on extended journal. I want to update it to Mojave, but I'm concerned about future updates since I'm on extended journal.
How would updates work?
Does this also apply to a Late 2009 macpro 4.1?Mac Pro 5,1 is supported by Mojave. No need for patches