Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
So, after doing some testing today, Gog fixed galaxy so it still runs under Monterey, and what made me think I had to upgrade to continue to use it, turned out to be a bug. With that said, is there anyone who uses open Core to run Monterey on an older unsupported Mac? It's natively supported for me, but I was asking if anyone here that may be using it with OCLP, or natively how at risk is the system at this point in terms of security? I've been using Sequoia a little over a week now, and the only advantage I've seen is upgrading to the latest versions of the Apple apps, and a few of my third party ones as well. In terms of anything special coming from that, I haven't seen anything I already had under Monterey. Currently I have Monterey installs on an APFS volume as a secondary install but now I'm wondering how safe I'd be just sticking to it as long as possible .
 
  • Love
Reactions: OKonnel
@OKonnel I opened an image in Preview under 15.4 on my 17, 1 iMac and here are the screenshots of the two windows.
According to google, finding the histogram is under adjust color, so hopefully you can see if it's there, or not based on the pictures.
Screenshot 2025-04-13 at 5.27.54 PM.png
Screenshot 2025-04-13 at 5.28.20 PM.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: OKonnel
Hey all, I'm a bit unclear regarding feature unlock in the Open core app. By default it's disabled, however on my iMac 17,1 under 15.4, Continuity camera was working, but according to Dortania, Feature Unlock needs to be enabled for those features to work. Since my iMac is Metal and AVX2 compatible does the feature unlock setting not matter, and is it for older non metal macs only? A bit of clarity would help thanks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macpro_mid2014
Hey all, I'm a bit unclear regarding feature unlock in the Open core app. By default it's disabled, however on my iMac 17,1 under 15.4, Continuity camera was working, but according to Dortania, Feature Unlock needs to be enabled for those features to work. Since my iMac is Metal and AVX2 compatible does the feature unlock setting not matter, and is it for older non metal macs only? A bit of clarity would help thanks.
Keyboard/Mouse share also works with feature unlock disabled on MBP11,2.
My scenario: MacMini M4 Pro sharing with MBP 11,2.
 
I can't remember when I updated to Sonoma.

I'm now going to venture in Sequoia.

Do I use the DVI monitor input to ensure seeing the progress?

Running the RX580, and currently on Sonoma. THANKS
 
Hey all, I'm a bit unclear regarding feature unlock in the Open core app. By default it's disabled, however on my iMac 17,1 under 15.4, Continuity camera was working, but according to Dortania, Feature Unlock needs to be enabled for those features to work. Since my iMac is Metal and AVX2 compatible does the feature unlock setting not matter, and is it for older non metal macs only? A bit of clarity would help thanks.
FeatureUnlock is not needed for Kaby Lake+ CPUs.
 
Very smooth upgrade from Sequoia 15.4 -> 15.5 Beta (24F5042g) on my HackBookPro6,2 (2010 non-metal Nvidia Tesla). Applying post-install patches with OCLP 2.3.2. Very impressed by how well this old hack continues to perform. OCLP Devs, thank you for preserving the fun in tinkering with old hardware like this! Still hoping for another year of Intel support so that the fun doesn't end.

View attachment 2500996
MBP5,2: Smooth re-installation of 15.4 from USB installer, using latest OCLP 2.4.0n for EFI and root patching.
(Something had gone wrong with the first installation as written earlier - needed safe boot then had no graphics acceleration. Now all fine i.e. graphics, USB1 (internal keyboard+trackpad), WLAN.)
Didn't try yet migration of user data by migration assistant or CCC.

Machine is now 15.5 years old, release numbers seem to match its age. - Thank you developers!
 
Thanks, I have a Skylake here, the 2017 iMac that came out the year I got this one is the Kaby Lake. It was one of those times where no one knew if Apple was going to refresh the iMac or not, so I got what I needed at the time, and it came out in just enough time that I couldn't exchange what I got. At this point, though it wouldn't really matter, I'd only have the rest of this year with native Ventura support before Apple cuts it off.

Also, after looking at that page, my late 2015 iMac supports Sidecar natively, it would need open core for airplay even under Monterey, and then newer features of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macpro_mid2014
Have you been able to download the update? It doesn't appear to be available in OCLP yet?

I installed OTA, simple quick and good results, the patcher said that the KDK for 15.4 was closest, so no message from OCLP to update during the OTA download.
 
Premise:
I believe that this message is not OT because, in my case, it is the result of experimentation with OCLP from its very first version with Big Sur until today.
And even if at a certain point I talk about BetterDisplay I do it for all those like us who thanks to OCLP continue to use their Macs, made obsolete by Apple and many of which work perfectly up to Sonoma, even if acknowledging the lower hardware performance, as I explain later (but not in the Finder which, instead, flies like in a new Mac! ... And our Macs also fly with many apps, even heavy ones).

Therefore my suggestion is an added value to OCLP... and for intellectual honesty, I will also post the same message in the Sonoma Thread.

All this has confirmed to me that Sequoia represents a great experiment useful for developing AI. And since AI does not concern Intel Macs, why do we persist in using an Operating System that is undoubtedly heavy and does not introduce anything truly new compared to Sonoma?

Finally, yesterday I had the courage to abandon macOS 15.4 Sequoia forever to return to macOS 14.7.5 Sonoma, after formatting the entire internal disk from scratch .
After the installation was complete, iCloud restored all my Internet accounts that I had in Sequoia, and all my passwords are still there, although Sequoia's Passwords app is missing, which is very limited compared to 1Password, which I've always subscribed to.

I used a USB Key created with OCLP 2.4.0 Nightly, rebooted the Mac and in Recovery mode used the Terminal to completely format the internal SSD on which I wanted to install the System.
diskutil eraseDisk APFS “Macintosh HD” /dev/diskX
(NOTE:the X corresponds to the disk number you get by examining with Disk Utility or the diskutil list command in Terminal. In my case, it was /dev/disk0)

Pure Joy! Pure Joy! Pure Joy! Why my iMac seems to be reborn and perfect, like one just purchased (better hardware performance aside, of course, when processing and saving videos or with very heavy 3D uses...)

In the OCLP options I enabled medianalisysd (by unchecking, in Settings->Extra, the “Disable medianalisysd service” box, that blocks it; so I enabled FeatureUnlock in Settings->Advanced>FeatureUnlock (“Enabled”) since my iMac 27", late 2013, despite have a Kepler series video card, until Sonoma NEVER had any of the conflicts or problems described in the OCLP “Issues”, but only with Sequoia did stability seem to resemble u PC more than a Mac...

With Sonoma, in fact, the feeling is that of having a rock! With Sequoia, on the other hand, all sorts of things were happening: fans running all of a sudden, in some circumstance the custom icons are not directly customizable and require tricks; the Preview.app histogram does not work; The Preview.app exports from HEIC to JPG often go haywire, etc.

So, thanks to BetterDisplay (configuring it well, with patience), I got the display on my iMac to behave exactly like the Apple Studio Display... In fact, not only does System Information recognize it as a Retina screen and displays the same mode of the Retina Display, in System Settings, to adjust the Display definition... But macOS itself inserts detailed system icons, on the fly. You can see it very well by activating Zoom (CTRL + Mouse in Accessibility->Zoom) and enlarging the Safari icon to full screen which, from blurry and with a single line delimiting the rays, becomes sharp and even the half lines appear.

Not to mention the text that becomes sharp and not grainy at maximum zoom of the menu bar.
Compared to Apple Studio Display, the sharpness at maximum zoom is identical. Obviously the ASD has a wider color gamut and a higher brightness but the brightness, however, can be increased with BetterDisplay, from Image Adjustment->Gain).

Screenshopt_01.jpg


IMG_8160.jpeg


IMG_8161.jpeg
 
I installed OTA, simple quick and good results, the patcher said that the KDK for 15.4 was closest, so no message from OCLP to update during the OTA download.
Do you continue with the same process after updating via OTA, applying the build to the EFI unit?

I disabled all updates in the system settings to update manually.
 
Do you continue with the same process after updating via OTA, applying the build to the EFI unit?

I disabled all updates in the system settings to update manually.

After OTA, on the opening screen OCLP asks to reapply patches, when that process completes it asks to reboot, click ok. Finished
 
@OKonnel I opened an image in Preview under 15.4 on my 17, 1 iMac and here are the screenshots of the two windows.
According to google, finding the histogram is under adjust color, so hopefully you can see if it's there, or not based on the pictures.
View attachment 2501839View attachment 2501840
[For the Forum’s Admin, thanks.
It may seem that I am going OT at some point. SINCE, thanks to what I have found out (and what is confirmed on the net, about BetterDisplay), many of us who have increased the longevity of our Macs, thanks to OCLP, can further improve their experience and joy, as happened to me.
And MAYBE some good OCLP developer could even introduce an option to have OCLP be able to enable in the NVRAM the HiDPI capabilities of the display... That would be great!]

Thank you, @MacinMan , for taking on this minor annoyance with the two screenshots.
In fact, in my case, it is precisely that Histogram that does not appear with Sequoia, and furthermore, moving the two sliders at either end or pressing the "Auto Levels" button makes the image disappear.
But in my case I have a Kepler series nVidia card while you do not.

Anyway, yesterday, after restoring my iMac from scratch and reinstalling Sonoma, I returned to being fully in control of my big iMac and fully happy!
Apart from the fact that with Sonoma it works EVERYTHING perfectly well, like a new Mac, I feel no lack compared to Sequoia which I abandoned.

But why on earth did I have to keep an Operating System that among its few innovations introduced two dynamic backgrounds that were as complex as they were ugly?...
And since when did we Mac Users, who used to pride ourselves on the essentiality and clean of the GUI (always beautiful anyway...) get dazzled and enticed by a background of trees that... move every time the Mac falls asleep and wakes up? ...

Windows, on the contrary, whose naive users adored these childish games, with version 10 and 11 introduced a simple background that does not contribute to fatigue.
Sad that the new Apple’s minds, for such useless (and harmful to eye and mental fatigue) things, have taken time away from other functions development. It was enough to repurpose the usual HEIC dynamic backgrounds and JPG and PNG ones…

That said, if you have read my farewell post on Sequoia, you will also have learned of my discovery about my display that actually, unlocked thanks to a simple utility created and sold on GitHub, behaves like a Studio Display.
And to think that in Catalina (which I have in the second internal SSD belonging to the former Fusion Drive) the operating system sets the high-definition icons by itself and the text does not appear blurry when zooming to full screen.

So all of us who do not have Retina screens and who with OCLP were able to use the new macOS, from 11 onwards, did not notice the deterioration of graphic details and that Apple, underneath, managed to make obsolete screens perfect, even if for not highly productive and professional uses!....

A friend of mine bought the top-of-the-line Mac Mini Pro M4 and was using it with a decent 2560x1440 external screen. Definition that corresponds to iMacs like mine and the REAL definition with which Apple handles 5K displays and the Studio Display.
Well: even in his case, so without OCLP and using the best Mac Mini Pro, the text and system icons were grainy. All this induced him to buy a new display, since he too had forgotten, as I had, the better behavior of the same Monitor, up to Mojave and even in Catalina, even though Catalina no longer has the smart HiDPI fonts and definitions that Apple removed from Mojave onward.

I invited my friend, therefore, to try BetterDisplay before he bled to buy a good 4K monitor, an expensive 5K or the Studio Display.
The result for normal video and graphic uses, going by a comparison with the Studio Display, is identical to what you get with the Studio Display!

Of course, I am not foolish to compare the overall quality of the Studio Display and the better color rendering. The fact of the matter is that at a normal glance (but also by zooming in to the full screen, for example of the time on the menu bar) you can see very well that there is no substantial difference and - ESPECIALLY - that you don't damage our eyesight any more!

Since I stopped using Catalina, in fact, I had not noticed this until now, and in the last few years I have been experiencing visual deterioration.
Thank you, Apple! And I was not consoled to find out that it was not dependent on having used OCLP since the same degradation in GUI clarity was experienced by this friend with the new Mac Mini M4 Pro top of the line.

Lastly: even if your monitor is officially 5K, have you tried to turn on zoom in System Settings -> Accessibility and see if by any chance (mysteriously) macOS sets you Low Definition Icons and Text?... ;)

(But apparently so is my 2013 iMac display, as deduced from the screenshots I posted earlier since BetterDisplay does nothing but unlock NVRAM, does NOT install drivers, and does NOT start any support apps...
After all, it's the same LG model and only the final additional acronyms change. Maybe because it just changes the internal firmware?... Mystery)
 
Last edited:
I did that a few times with my MBP a while back. Restoring with TimeMachine on Sequoia was pretty much broken for me. Would never finish. That's why I went back to supported Monterey on it. Not touching it again..
Some observations regadring TM restores I made over the years (esp. on OCLP´d systems):
Sometimes it helps to do the restore directly upon installing/upgrading macOS (during end phase of the setup process when asked). Also it proved beneficial for actually completing the restore to de-select files in the "other data" checkbox (so only user data, programs and settings are transferred from the TM backup). Otherwise the restore process really might stall at some point.
 
I installed OTA, simple quick and good results, the patcher said that the KDK for 15.4 was closest, so no message from OCLP to update during the OTA download.
Thanks. On a rather slow external HDD, the OTA update just hangs. The download is now available in OCLP & will be installed this evening.
 
[For the Forum’s Admin, thanks.
It may seem that I am going OT at some point. SINCE, thanks to what I have found out (and what is confirmed on the net, about BetterDisplay), many of us who have increased the longevity of our Macs, thanks to OCLP, can further improve their experience and joy, as happened to me.
And MAYBE some good OCLP developer could even introduce an option to have OCLP be able to enable in the NVRAM the HiDPI capabilities of the display... That would be great!]

Thank you, @MacinMan , for taking on this minor annoyance with the two screenshots.
In fact, in my case, it is precisely that Histogram that does not appear with Sequoia, and furthermore, moving the two sliders at either end or pressing the "Auto Levels" button makes the image disappear.
But in my case I have a Kepler series nVidia card while you do not.

Anyway, yesterday, after restoring my iMac from scratch and reinstalling Sonoma, I returned to being fully in control of my big iMac and fully happy!
Apart from the fact that with Sonoma it works EVERYTHING perfectly well, like a new Mac, I feel no lack compared to Sequoia which I abandoned.

But why on earth did I have to keep an Operating System that among its few innovations introduced two dynamic backgrounds that were as complex as they were ugly?...
And since when did we Mac Users, who used to pride ourselves on the essentiality and clean of the GUI (always beautiful anyway...) get dazzled and enticed by a background of trees that... move every time the Mac falls asleep and wakes up? ...

Windows, on the contrary, whose naive users adored these childish games, with version 10 and 11 introduced a simple background that does not contribute to fatigue.
Sad that the new Apple’s minds, for such useless (and harmful to eye and mental fatigue) things, have taken time away from other functions development. It was enough to repurpose the usual HEIC dynamic backgrounds and JPG and PNG ones…

That said, if you have read my farewell post on Sequoia, you will also have learned of my discovery about my display that actually, unlocked thanks to a simple utility created and sold on GitHub, behaves like a Studio Display.
And to think that in Catalina (which I have in the second internal SSD belonging to the former Fusion Drive) the operating system sets the high-definition icons by itself and the text does not appear blurry when zooming to full screen.

So all of us who do not have Retina screens and who with OCLP were able to use the new macOS, from 11 onwards, did not notice the deterioration of graphic details and that Apple, underneath, managed to make obsolete screens perfect, even if for not highly productive and professional uses!....

A friend of mine bought the top-of-the-line Mac Mini Pro M4 and was using it with a decent 2560x1440 external screen. Definition that corresponds to iMacs like mine and the REAL definition with which Apple handles 5K displays and the Studio Display.
Well: even in his case, so without OCLP and using the best Mac Mini Pro, the text and system icons were grainy. All this induced him to buy a new display, since he too had forgotten, as I had, the better behavior of the same Monitor, up to Mojave and even in Catalina, even though Catalina no longer has the smart HiDPI fonts and definitions that Apple removed from Mojave onward.

I invited my friend, therefore, to try BetterDisplay before he bled to buy a good 4K monitor, an expensive 5K or the Studio Display.
The result for normal video and graphic uses, going by a comparison with the Studio Display, is identical to what you get with the Studio Display!

Of course, I am not foolish to compare the overall quality of the Studio Display and the better color rendering. The fact of the matter is that at a normal glance (but also by zooming in to the full screen, for example of the time on the menu bar) you can see very well that there is no substantial difference and - ESPECIALLY - that you don't damage our eyesight any more!

Since I stopped using Catalina, in fact, I had not noticed this until now, and in the last few years I have been experiencing visual deterioration.
Thank you, Apple! And I was not consoled to find out that it was not dependent on having used OCLP since the same degradation in GUI clarity was experienced by this friend with the new Mac Mini M4 Pro top of the line.

Lastly: even if your monitor is officially 5K, have you tried to turn on zoom in System Settings -> Accessibility and see if by any chance (mysteriously) macOS sets you Low Definition Icons and Text?... ;)

(But apparently so is my 2013 iMac display, as deduced from the screenshots I posted earlier since BetterDisplay does nothing but unlock NVRAM, does NOT install drivers, and does NOT start any support apps...
After all, it's the same LG model and only the final additional acronyms change. Maybe because it just changes the internal firmware?... Mystery)
I use Zoom all the time, and I haven't noticed any differences over natively Supported Monterey, and below.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ronton3
Some observations regadring TM restores I made over the years (esp. on OCLP´d systems):
Sometimes it helps to do the restore directly upon installing/upgrading macOS (during end phase of the setup process when asked). Also it proved beneficial for actually completing the restore to de-select files in the "other data" checkbox (so only user data, programs and settings are transferred from the TM backup). Otherwise the restore process really might stall at some point.
Agreed on your observations and the "other data" checkbox.
My experience has been that it has always worked but sometimes needs a little help.
As long as the backup and the target has matching installs it has been fine IMHO.
Using an ethernet connection helps.
Also going from an OCLP Mac to a supported Mac has always worked so far which is very useful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Larsvonhier
I use Zoom all the time, and I haven't noticed any differences over natively Supported Monterey, and below.
Look I wasn't referring to the Zoom application, but I was referring to enabling zoom in System Settings -> Accessibility - Zoom.
After that, by holding down the CRTL key and turning the Mouse wheel, you can zoom in on any icon or parts of text until it takes up the whole screen...
I will stop so as not to disturb the Thread further by going OT. Although I am actually stimulating to max out all those who use OCLP and have the original iMacs with screens that are not Retina.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.