Having established the lowest 64-bit CPU as the Celeron M 520, does that also make it the very slowest CPU that could potentially boot into Big Sur / Monterey, provided you've done all the other hacks?
No, due to no SSE4. El Capitan is as good as it gets.Having established the lowest 64-bit CPU as the Celeron M 520, does that also make it the very slowest CPU that could potentially boot into Big Sur / Monterey, provided you've done all the other hacks?
Oh, didn't know about that. But Core 2 Duos can go up to Monterey right? Hrutkay did it on a 2007 iMac with GPU mod.No, due to no SSE4. El Capitan is as good as it gets.
Only 45nm (“Penryn”) Core 2 Duos can. 65nm (“Merom”) Core 2 Duos can’t.But Core 2 Duos can go up to Monterey right?
You can upgrade a 2007 iMac (Socket P) to a 45nm CPUs, but not a 2006 iMac or Mac mini (Socket M). There are no 45nm CPUs for Socket M.Hrutkay did it on a 2007 iMac with GPU mod.
Those are the Socket P C2D's right?Only 45nm “Penryn” Core 2 Duos can. 65nm “Merom” can’t.
Fair enough. Well in that case, I'd still love to see someone try El Capitan on a Celeron!65nm (“Merom”) Core 2 Duos can’t
The only way that could be done is with MacPostFactor. So, yes it would El Cap but since there is zero graphics acceleration performance would be abysmal.I'd still love to see someone try El Capitan on a Celeron!
No, due to no SSE4. El Capitan is as good as it gets.
I'd presume so. Every other component is fully supported on Sierra, unless you have the 7300 GT which I don't think runs on El Cap either.This is what also limits the Mac Pro 1,1/2,1 to El Capitan as well?
I'd presume so. Every other component is fully supported on Sierra, unless you have the 7300 GT which I don't think runs on El Cap either.
Had a quick read of it, seems like some definite progress is being made. Might be helpful to see if a Clovertown could at least post on a 3,1, but I'll leave that discussion to the MP forum.This is an interesting thread about attempts to bypass the Mac Pro 1,1/2,1 limitation with posts as recent as October. I'll post there or create a new thread rather than derail yours
Yup. There are both Merom and Penryn Core 2 Duos for Socket P.Those are the Socket P C2D's right?
Yup.This is what also limits the Mac Pro 1,1/2,1 to El Capitan as well?
Usually, maxing out a computer only implies hardware upgrades.Wouldn't installing a newer supported operating system classify as "maxing out the mini" also?
I later installed an SSD into the same mini and transferred the Lion OS but haven't figured out how to transfer the Windows installation from the old hard drive to the new SSD (Windows always is a pain in the ass isn't it).
Thanks for the hint, I’ll keep looking for a way to accomplish this!In the past Norton Ghost always came up trumps whenever I needed to image a Windows installation but its been discontinued since 2013 and appears that compatibility with newer versions of Windows is problematic.
I've seen mentions of Winclone but have no personal experience with it.Thanks for the hint, I’ll keep looking for a way to accomplish this!
👍
No idea. The only things I can think of is the heatsink was/is too loose or the socket retention clip isn't working properly.The question is: How could that CPU have come to that angled/miplaced position at the first place? Did anybody ever see such misplaced CPU before?
Also, the mini would not have booted up with the T2300 in it, as the 2007 mini requires a firmware patch to run Yonah-based CPUs.I decided to replace the Intel T7200 CPU with the T2300 which had been lying around in my drawer
The firmware update is required before it can detect any Merom/64-bit CPU.The reason why I'm posting is that after the CPU upgrade the system wouldn't boot anymore (no chime), so I changed the CPU back. The question is: Is my CPU broken or are there more dependencies not being communicated. I don't want to upgrade the firmware without the CPU upgrade as that could easily brick the machine...
It's been years since I did mine but as far as I remember, the 1,1 firmware will boot fine with a Merom CPU. Flashing the 2,1 firmware gains you support for more than 2GB of RAM and Lion, although you will have to copy Lion across from another working Mac. I am pretty sure I put my C2D processor in before I updated. the firmware. There are plenty of Youtube videos where people are just dropping T7200 chips into their Yonah based Minis without flashing. Lowendmac seems to agree.The firmware update is required before it can detect any Merom/64-bit CPU.
Very hard to something to go wrong with the firmware upgrade, and the 2,1 firmware can function with a Yonah/32-bit CPU.
The Mac mini is very different to the MBP in that aside from the CPU being socketed, there are zero other hardware differences between the Mini 1,1 and 2,1, while there are with the MBP 1,1/2,1.
Hey y'all! I've got a Mini 2,1 (T5600 CPU) that I'd like to have some fun with. I'm planning to add 4GB of RAM and put in an SSD, but I dunno what OS to put on it.
I'd like to keep it a Mac machine, and I do have the original Leopard discs I could use, but it feels like I could do more with the machine upgrading to say Mountain Lion or Mavericks. What are my options aside from ordering discs on eBay, and without changing the main chip what's going to work smoothly?