He has an excellent point. How consumers and the press overlook that monster bezel but talk endlessly about the tiny flat tire of the moto is beyond me.
I don't find that gentleman's point excellent nor even substantiated. I think I understand the industrial design group's intentions behind the Apple Watch's bezel but I don't find them particularly offensive. It appears that where the display ends the bezel begins to curve downward, which lends to its size from a top-down perspective. But, again, I haven't found them to be an impediment in any way. On the other hand, I do find the Moto 360's display to be irksome because that black "shelf" turns what would be an otherwise round display into a clamshell or flat tire or whatever the nomenclature is. Despite the size of the bezels on the Apple Watch, they don't interfere with the shape of the display.
Motorola can justify their decision by citing display-to-body ratio but I'm sure they're working on eliminating the shelf in future iterations while Apple, I think, will keep the bezel size, monster or not, on their watch for easier swipe gestures and aesthetics.