Sorry I didn't reply. I missed your post. I do plan to keep the One. I'm awaiting the camera software update since it seems unanimous that the results are much better. I'm hopeful that'll help me reconcile the hit or miss camera.
Read my OP for more in-depth details why I think One is ultimately a keeper despite HTC making some really stupid decisions.
----------
UPDATE: After some careful consideration, I've decided I am going to return the Dev Edition One and get the One through Tmobile.
I'm really annoyed that HTC made an unlocked GSM phone that is only LTE-capable with one network. That is stupid. What's the point of getting it if you're not on or planning to go to AT&T then?
As a T-Mobile user, you're stuck on HSPA 21 MB/s (not even the good HSPA+ which is 42 MB/s). And you'd think up to 21 MB/s is good enough, right? Except Tmobile's coverage sucks [in NYC]. I am constantly seeing "E" for Edge and "3G" on my device. That's unacceptable this day and age on a 2013 super smartphone.
Again, a huge knock against HTC.
So, reluctantly, I give up the extra 32GBs, the $100 Blackberry Curve trade-in, and the fact that I'll get updates directly from HTC (this one hurts the most).
And for trading all that, I'll get LTE with HSPA+ 42 MB/s to fall back on (and I guess WiFi calling). When you tally the math for the full priced Tmobile HTC One, it comes out to about $630 bucks after tax. That's significantly more than the $550 I paid for the Dev. Edition One (after $100 rebate from the trade-in).
That REALLY sucks, but ultimately, more reliable coverage and faster data service is more important to me. It's something I would use everyday.
Thoughts on whether I'm making the right decision or not?
Well if you really desire that LTE then good choice, but do you know for sure the coverage is great in NYC? If not not such a great choice. I am on the nexus 4 and gave up LTE and never looked back. Now I do I have note 2 to fall back on if I want LTE, but really I am OK without it.