Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Because they don’t want to pay Apple the 15%
They never been real fans of Apples App Store. Took several years to join then dropped the App Store only 3 years later.
The change is the end of a long saga — despite Apple adding in-app subscription options to iPhones in 2010, Netflix didn’t add them to its iOS app until 2015 because it was opposed to Apple’s 30 percent cut. In late 2018, Netflix decided it didn’t want to pay Apple at all, dropping in-app subscriptions entirely, and it never looked back.
 
I understand not wanting to pay 15% to apple for doing nothing. That's reasonable. What isn't reasonable is increasing prices for bringing bad content to the platform and refusing to integrate with ecosystems.
It depends on how you look at it they have just signed a deal with WWE for next 10 years so will probably get extra subscribers for that
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
Based on past Netflix threads, I'm thinking every outraged Apple person has quit Netflix 6 or 7 times in the last 12-18 months or so... so I presume this affects no one. ;)

However, that said, can you blame them? Pay direct and keep 15%. Facilitate another kind of payment and lose 15% "right off the top." If roles were reversed, what would Apple Inc. do?

Only based on the assumption that less than 15% of people who are paying through Apple will use this as an opportunity to just quit paying for Netflix, especially with all the price increases and sharing restrictions they implemented recently. Netflix should have done it when there was a lot more customer goodwill.
 
This is bad news for consumers who use in-app purchases to protect their most private data.
No it really isn’t. Stop being alarmist.
Apparently, dumastudetto and other consumers have never looked to see what data apps collect on them which can be found under the sections titled "Data Used to Track You" and "Data Linked to You"

What other data is there that's more private than: contact info, financial info, health and fitness, browsing history, usage data, purchases, location, contacts, search history, identifiers, "sensitive info," and other data? 🤣


data.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
Apparently, dumastudetto and other consumers have never looked to see what data apps collect on them which can be found under the sections titled "Data Used to Track You" and "Data Linked to You" otherwise they'd see something like this 🤣


View attachment 2353578
Since when have they ever looked? Also, what app is this?
 
It depends on how you look at it they have just signed a deal with WWE for next 10 years so will probably get extra subscribers for that

Well, that's definitely a good reason to cancel Netflix, I'd be seriously pissed if I was paying for movies and discovered that my money was instead going to that idiocy.

I mean, I'll never get cable because I can't tell them I don't want Faux Nooz or ESPN.
 
And yet, on the social (and regular) media I see a lot more posts/articles about Netflix shows than Apple TV shows (the latter are almost never mentioned). None of the Apple TV shows had as much resonance as Stranger Things, Squid Game, Griselda etc. Besides, Netflix is much better at offering third party content. For example, one can watch Walking Dead (from AMC). On Apple TV, you'd need to pay for each episode.
If you are into true crime and documentaries, it's hard to be Netflix.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
Because that’s how selling stuff on third party works.

If I were to sell your product at my shop, I would expect some form of commission from selling your product. Say 10% to keep it fair. You get more exposure for the product you made and you generate profit from sales by selling at my store.

You can’t expect me to sell your product and I get nothing. I’m not running a charity. It costs money to run the shop selling your product.

Same with Netflix trying to do business with Apple via App Store. Latter aren’t running a charity shop. They are business. They expect to take commission because running a business to sell a third party product costs money.

Nothing new here. Common business practice.

What about the Walmart app, or McDonalds, or Taco Bell? Apple is happy to let people download those apps and get NOTHING in return, even though they use the app to sell stuff to them. Yes, Apple doesn't deliver the stuff purchased on those apps, but Apple also doesn't deliver the streams on Netflix.

Also, Netflix doesn't want or need the distribution or marketing that the App store provides. They only use it because its the only way Apple lets people put apps on their phones.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
I got the email about this update on Monday. I added the date to my calendar so I know when to stop using the service. I was already on the verge of dropping them when they broke the “restore purchase” button in their app years ago. They've already reduced the quality of video for our subscription tier and hiked the prices up. When the app ceases to work completely, I’ll just uninstall it and be done with them. I can find a way to live without the Great British Baking Show.
 
What about the Walmart app, or McDonalds, or Taco Bell? Apple is happy to let people download those apps and get NOTHING in return, even though they use the app to sell stuff to them. Yes, Apple doesn't deliver the stuff purchased on those apps, but Apple also doesn't deliver the streams on Netflix.
Apple looks at Netflix the same as most TV manufacturers, they are means to an end. Not competition. Everyone has heard of Netflix, selling devices that you can watch Netflix on is helpful for Apple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cardfan
My daughter living on her own can no longer watch on our account. Canceled Netflix after 11 years.
She wasn't part of your household and therefore not allowed to use your account.
 
I understand not wanting to pay 15% to apple for doing nothing. That's reasonable. What isn't reasonable is increasing prices for bringing bad content to the platform and refusing to integrate with ecosystems.
Streaming services in general aren't profitable. The general trend seems to be streaming companies raising prices, cutting costs (which often translates to less / cheaper content) and / or introducing an ad tier. The problem, of course, is churn, which is where bundles come in.

I am not sure why Netflix hasn't introduced an annual subscription option yet? Maybe they think they stand to lose more money than they earn?
 
Can't tell if you agree or disagree with me, and I'm fine with that.
Your examples are all companies that the public widely utilizes. Netflix is just another. So yeah along the same thoughts. Starbucks would be another, think Apple would try to tax in application purchases of what the public consumes on a huge scale? I doubt it. These are all examples where Apple contributes nothing really except approve the apps for iOS/IPadOS usage. :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.