BTWBTW, I just checked this out. Do a search on the ACD forums here or on apple.com discussions and you'll see people having the same issues on a good amount of the screens.
Here are just a few I found so far...
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=1105900􍿬
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=1105692􍼜
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=2139919�
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=1104743􍭧
Pretty much the same consensus there as it is here: many people are happy with theirs and a good amount also post about pink hues, yellow/blue banding, etc. A couple users chalked it up to the LCD technology itself - even in expensive ACD's! The idea I get is that larger LCD's simply have a tougher time getting colors even.
they actually have a saying at Apple: "smug graphic designers will buy anything expensive and brag it's the best, let's raise the price of the mac pros and ACDs"
Some of us smug graphic designers are actually good enough and make enough money to afford the appropriate gear.
Some of us smug graphic designers are actually good enough and make enough money to afford the appropriate gear.
Just wanted to post some pics of my new 24" iMac to show you all how different the bleed and gradient are.......if you look at my first pics (page 5) near the beginning of the thread you can see the bleed is virtually non-existent in comparison. The pics were taken with the same 5mp N95 Nokia that the others were taken with. I have to say the camera shows a small amount of bleed that you cant see with the naked eye. I really cant detect any at all and was surprised the camera picked up on something invisible to me. The white screen looks like an even white to my eye but on the pic i can see some variation.....I cant detect any cool to warm gradient in real life at all and the pic doesn't show any cold left hand side either. I hope this helps and gives those thinking of getting a 24" iMac some hope.![]()
pppffffff!!!! you probably "design" restaurant place mats as menus! haha... good to see the mac pro is being used to it full advantage!!!
if you're overzealous company ever needs to downgrade, i got some clamshell G3 iBooks i'll sell to you for $20 each... i'm quite certain they'll offer more than enough power to handle your fine work.
i always found it best to photograph the screen in a very dark room using a florescent filter ...
Actually I work for an advertising company that does print and some television work. Generally speaking, HD video benefits from a machine that has over 2 GB of RAM and a 320 GB HD *cough*. But hey, if you like trying to do real creative work on the same kind of hardware I bought for my daughter to play her Dora the Explorer games, be my guest.
and I used to think that a 25Mhz 80386 was fast. Todays professional tool is tomorrows toy.
strange that your camera is picking up those colors. maybe there was some polarizing/lighting setting or something when they were shot? i always found it best to photograph the screen in a very dark room using a florescent filter (although any auto setting should do just fine).
at first the images kinda freaked me out... i though the later week builds were exhibiting green blotches in the center of the screen with red edges... ha
im so hoping they'll have an MV820 at the apple store next week when i exchange this.
ha! i recall the good old days of the G3 400MHz Special Edition iMac - IT HAD A DVD PLAYER AND EVERYTHING!and of course Photoshop 5.5 was blazing fast on that machine...