Mmmm Bartelby's is yummy.
I think that's the general look, but I believe it will be more of a "mold" form factor. Meaning it almost looks as if it is one piece. The hinge on the back is kinda ugly, and yes the corners need to be smoother.
-=|Mgkwho
I'm not getting this whole multitouch, low slung wedge shape fetish going on here.
Why would anybody want to use a computer that requires them to keep their arms and hands in the air?
And look how much space a 24" wedge lying flat on your desk would waste? And talk about neck strain!
I think this is the stupidest idea I've ever heard, and this is a horrible implementation of the stupid idea. Mutli-touch computer? That's trying way too hard to solve a problem that doesn't exist.
Honestly--I don't get it.About time someone thought logically about multi-touch Macs. Talk about major strain on your arms.
Ok, I knocked this up whilst watching the F1.
The stand is similar to the Wacom Cintiq stand which allows angle and rotation adjustment.
There are a few things I could change but I didn't spend much time doing it.
How many people look straight down at papers on a table? Most of us pick them up and read them at near-vertical, exactly the same angle we normally set our computer screens at. A slight bend in the neck wouldn't be a problem, but when your design is laid on it's longer base the user would have to be standing virtually over it to see the LCD screen, and therefore the bend would be a lot more than slight.How will my design strain a person's neck? It is better than looking straight down at papers on a table. Plus current research has shown that a slight bend in the back is better than a perfectly straight back.
How is my design a poor design again? Seriously I don't get it.
leviG -----
what program are you using to make those designs?