Is it stupid? From the videos I’ve seen it’s a pretty dramatic effect to live with for 3-5-7 years for some adopters. Wonder if software fix with the pro motion could reduce it a bit"Ghostgate" haha let the stupid begin
I have the iPhone 13 Pro with promotion and then over the years I’ve had a lot of 144 Hz and 160 Hz PC monitors. The iPhone screen as smooth as butter compared to the mini LED display. It’s been a while since I’ve used an iPad Pro so I can’t comment on whether or not this is any worse than that. But yes objectively speaking this display does not feel anywhere close to 120 Hz just scrolling up and down a webpage for example.Do you have ipad pro or another device with pro motion or it is your first device with this feature. Something it seems percepetion of 120 hz is very subjective.
I think in that case they could just write to the pixel multiple times every 12 ms until the pixel changes no?That looks like the pixel persistence is REALLY high. I wonder why'd they do that except for maybe it allows the Pro Motion to clock the screen down WAY low and not have the text fade away in between writes.
I remember having to shop for a high persistence monitor when I used an Amiga a long time ago. (Dual sync was really expensive at the time and mono high persistence monitors were cheap.)
Not if the display is clocked REALLY low. But high persistent pixels would also complicate things when it's clocked high, so I'm not saying I know anything for sure! It just looks like what I'd expect if pixel persistence was high and screen refresh slow.I think in that case they could just write to the pixel multiple times every 12 ms until the pixel changes no?
I mean if you have a low persistence display and a high refresh rate, you won’t really ever have a problem simulating a high persistence display by simply writing to the pixel repeatedly with super low refresh rates. So in regards to your previous post, there would be no reason for Apple to ever purposely put a high persistence display in a machine in order to accommodate low refresh rates.Not if the display is clocked REALLY low. But high persistent pixels would also complicate things when it's clocked high, so I'm not saying I know anything for sure! It just looks like what I'd expect if pixel persistence was high and screen refresh slow.
Anywho, I bet it's a bug this time and for some reason it's clocking the display really low when you're using a terminal session.
I didn't order one, so I can't play with it, but is there a way to turn pro motion off? If so, someone should try it and then display text like that again. If it's a bug, I'd expect it to look normal, if it looks the same, I'd want to see the full specs of the screen!
What you say doesn't work with the display clocked low (refresh), which is part of how you get an always on display on an iPhone without using massive amounts of battery life. It works if you clock the display high all the time though!I mean if you have a low persistence display and a high refresh rate, you won’t really ever have a problem simulating a high persistence display by simply writing to the pixel repeatedly with super low refresh rates. So in regards to your previous post, there would be no reason for Apple to ever purposely put a high persistence display in a machine in order to accommodate low refresh rates.
I didn't notice the videos were slowmo, and agree, that's just asking for ghosting!All of the videos where the ghosting looks really bad are taken in Slow-mo.
Try with whatever laptop you have now. When you video it in slow-mo you WILL get some ghosting, yet you hardly notice it when you look with your own eyes.
Im doing it tomorrow when I get the new one.It would be great if someone could make a comparison with the 2019 16 inch. The ghosting on that display bothered me a lot, and was one of the reasons I didn't keep it. I was hoping these new models would be better...
Some people stated that ProMotion does not work in safari but works in appstore etc. Can u try the same thing there or some other place?Slightly unscientific testing of recording slow motion video from my iPhone:
This is the 2021 iPad Pro 11", it's the most responsive and smoothest feeling of all.
View attachment 1879689
This is the 2020 M1 MacBook Air. The ghosting is quite pronounced, but it's 60hz so it doesn't feel that bad.
View attachment 1879688
This is the 2021 16" MacBook Pro. Uh, it's quite bad....
View attachment 1879690
That said, I still think it's a very nice screen, and it doesn't bother me a huge amount or look anywhere as bad as this when you're looking at it at real speed and not slowed down to 240 fps, but it's definitely disappointing compared to the iPad Pro.
Could you try the test in chrome? Your above pictures have me really worried about this.Here's the UFO test running at 118hz in Firefox* on the 16". (for some reason it couldn't hit a stable 120hz)
View attachment 1879705
*Safari doesn't run the UFO test at more than 60, but I still think Safari scrolling is 120.
I have iPad Pro 11 and 13 Pro, iPad's screen is trash compared to iPhone's. iPads and Macs have like 28-50ms response times when it should be at least less than 10ms. 13 Pro on the other hand is perfect.Do you have ipad pro or another device with pro motion or it is your first device with this feature. Something it seems percepetion of 120 hz is very subjective.