Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

snowboarder

macrumors 6502a
Original poster
Jun 9, 2007
538
1,998
I just checked out both Air models in an Apple store.
Really, really disappointing. Although the form and shape might
be tempting - really light, but the performance is a joke.
I understand the Intel-Apple-whoever legal issues, but they
shouldn't use the 4 years old processor in such a good (otherwise)
machine. A good screen, good keyboard, but no power.
Everything is sluggish and it doesn't even play the full HD videos.
The higher 13 model can not do it. The 11" model is even worse,
it's just a netbook.
Maybe with the 2.13GHz and 4GB of RAM is slightly better, but
they don't even have those models in the store, so no luck
checking it out.
They clearly are trying to attract your attention to the use
of flash instead of hard drives, but they forgot their OS X doesn't
support it fully....
If you need a small netbook to check out your email
and make some notes, it's good, But for anything even slightly
more demanding, skip it.
 

Nilonym

macrumors member
Jan 14, 2007
43
28
Seattle, WA
Everything is sluggish and it doesn't even play the full HD videos.
The higher 13 model can not do it. The 11" model is even worse,
it's just a netbook.

I've had my stock 11.6/128 for about 48 hours now. My experience has been very different than this. With 10.1 installed my MBA can play HD Flash without breaking a sweat; CPU is at about 50%, no discernible heat, no fan noise, smooth video.

It's too bad that Apple is apparently installing an older version of Flash lacking hardware acceleration in stores.
 

hachre

macrumors 6502a
Sep 26, 2007
690
43
I just checked out both Air models in an Apple store.
Really, really disappointing. Although the form and shape might
be tempting - really light, but the performance is a joke.
I understand the Intel-Apple-whoever legal issues, but they
shouldn't use the 4 years old processor in such a good (otherwise)
machine. A good screen, good keyboard, but no power.
Everything is sluggish and it doesn't even play the full HD videos.
The higher 13 model can not do it. The 11" model is even worse,
it's just a netbook.
Maybe with the 2.13GHz and 4GB of RAM is slightly better, but
they don't even have those models in the store, so no luck
checking it out.
They clearly are trying to attract your attention to the use
of flash instead of hard drives, but they forgot their OS X doesn't
support it fully....
If you need a small netbook to check out your email
and make some notes, it's good, But for anything even slightly
more demanding, skip it.

The Flash version on the models in the store is outdated. With a current Flash version they run it perfectly. At least the 13" does.
 

nylon

macrumors 65816
Oct 26, 2004
1,407
1,058
That's funny I just spent about 45 mins at the Apple store with both 11" and 13" machines. I specifically tested 1080p videos to gauge CPU and GPU performace. While the base 11" model definitely did stutter a little bit with 1080p video the 13" was totally fluid with no dropped frames whatsoever.
 

Fuchal

macrumors 68030
Sep 30, 2003
2,614
1,137
I understand wondering if it is possible, but in real life, why would you even want to play 1080P video on a display that is essentially 720P resolution?
 

einmusiker

macrumors 68040
Apr 26, 2010
3,001
355
Location: Location: Location:
checked out a barebones 11.6 in apple store last night and I was very impressed. opened apps lightning fast, opened safari, ical, mail, garageband, iphoto, and imovie all at the same time with no issues whatsoever, couldnt watch video as flash wasnt installed so that will be my big test when i get it
 

S.B.G

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 8, 2010
26,675
10,460
Detroit
... flash instead of hard drives, but they forgot their OS X doesn't
support it fully....

What do you mean about that? Could you explain that further please? I'm still learning some of the finer details of OS/X after 3 years.
 

hachre

macrumors 6502a
Sep 26, 2007
690
43
I use HTML5 on youtube.

You can also check out Safari Extension: "Click to Flash" it allows you to use quicktime for all flashes that provide H264 video (YouTube etc) which always runs perfectly...

What do you mean about that? Could you explain that further please? I'm still learning some of the finer details of OS/X after 3 years.

He means that OSX has no Trim support for flash memory yet. Quite a non factor issue that people get hung up about a lot... It essentially means that the performance of the SSD degrades after a long while of usage because of the way it works internally. This degradation is only solvable by introducing TRIM and Mac OS users at the moment have to go through lengths to manually reset their drives. However the degradation is so minimal that for me, a heavy user of a Intel SSD for over 1 year now the performance has degraded by 3%. So it is in no way a pressing issue...

I understand wondering if it is possible, but in real life, why would you even want to play 1080P video on a display that is essentially 720P resolution?

It's just to test the capability of the machines. Also some people might wanna hook up TVs or large displays...
 

rusty2192

macrumors 6502a
Oct 15, 2008
997
81
Kentucky
checked out a barebones 11.6 in apple store last night and I was very impressed. opened apps lightning fast, opened safari, ical, mail, garageband, iphoto, and imovie all at the same time with no issues whatsoever, couldnt watch video as flash wasnt installed so that will be my big test when i get it

I did the exact same thing. I opened up everything i could, included Aperture 3 and could not notice a bit of slow down. I also tried to go to youtube to see how it handled the HD stuff, but just like you, my store hadn't installed Flash. I did watch an HD trailer in iTunes though and it had no trouble, even with all of those apps running. Overall, i was very impressed! If only it was a bit cheaper I would sell my MacBook and get the 11" Air.
 

S.B.G

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 8, 2010
26,675
10,460
Detroit
It essentially means that the performance of the SSD degrades after a long while of usage because of the way it works internally.

Isn't the Flash storage in the new MBA different from a SSD? Does Trim affect both?
 

hachre

macrumors 6502a
Sep 26, 2007
690
43
Isn't the Flash storage in the new MBA different from a SSD? Does Trim affect both?

The SSD is the same thing just in a standard hard drive casing. Apart from that there is no difference. So yes, missing TRIM affects both.
 

Compile 'em all

macrumors 601
Apr 6, 2005
4,131
359
I understand wondering if it is possible, but in real life, why would you even want to play 1080P video on a display that is essentially 720P resolution?

Ever heard of an external monitor? You know Apple sells those screens which you can connect to laptops. They usually are bigger than 13".

:rolleyes:
 

S.B.G

Moderator
Staff member
Sep 8, 2010
26,675
10,460
Detroit
The SSD is the same thing just in a standard hard drive casing. Apart from that there is no difference. So yes, missing TRIM affects both.

It is still flash NAND storage, so yes, there is a TRIM. It could come in an update soon though.

OK. I think I understand now. The Flash storage on an SSD is housed in an enclosure similar to that of a typical HDD, and the new MBA drops the enclosure and Apple put the Flash storage right on the logic board. Am I right?
 

hachre

macrumors 6502a
Sep 26, 2007
690
43
OK. I think I understand now. The Flash storage on an SSD is housed in an enclosure similar to that of a typical HDD, and the new MBA drops the enclosure and Apple put the Flash storage right on the logic board. Am I right?

Exactly. And when it's housed it's called SSD. Otherwise it's just a bunch of flash memory chips.
 

racer1441

macrumors 68000
Jul 3, 2009
1,870
668
Considering all this 1080 HD stuff is BS just like the rest of the HD market, who cares?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.