You have yet to explain how it isn't profit motives as I ask again. This was a bad and costly mistake moving to in-house, for what profits?
"Dangerous" iPhone 8,hyperbole much?dangerous to who, iPhone likers? If any phone is dangerous it's the note 7.
I already explained above.Companies with billions of note 7's made will earn a profit relative to cents for a mere 1% inhouse operation.What about the other 99%?
By dangerous I mean iPhone 8 is going to pretty much demolish every smartphone maker out there including the record set by the iPhone 6.OLED,virtual home button,glass design,wireless charging etc.Many people I know are intentionally holding on to their old iPhones because its pretty much common knowledge that the iPhone 8 is going to be a smashing release.Samsung will need to pull out all the stops next year to stop the Apple steamroll.I am positive foldable displays or 4K Always ON OLED,more innovation in VR and Oculus is on the cards for Samsung because thats what it will take next year
The theory isn't that they were "worried", rather the opposite: they saw blood in the water and wanted to jump on it. Makes complete sense, and other than an exploding battery I think the strategy was sound. The Note 7 is kind of awesome and might have made the jump from niche device to powerhouse among consumers.
They released the phone at nearly the exact same time as last year.I would agree with the dangling carrot theory had they released it at least 15 days prior to the Note 5 launch.And another thing is that if it was a design flaw ,why are the phones made in China with similar capacity not affected?Chinese batteries make up 99% of the actual Note 7s
[doublepost=1474302418][/doublepost]
We will see, we will see.
Hahaha you actually think Samsung will fail?Thats a joke.HTC is struggling,Nokia is dead,Xiaomi and Huawei?Who buys em?Sony is busy digging a hole in the ground and burying themselves in it.Maybe Pixel devices which Google makes will challenge em.Maybe