Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Peepo

macrumors 65816
Jun 18, 2009
1,174
627
Note that users who install Office 365 from the AppStore will not see the impact - as SIP is lighter towards these apps.
I am going to try uninstall Office 365 and then redo from AppStore... I am going to try that. Wonder if the versions lag behind or anything.
 

jeanlain

macrumors 68020
Mar 14, 2009
2,462
958
SIP is antimalware tool, so much more than just a folder-access blocker.

It will heavily scrutinize apps that dont have Apple signature - even though they have original developer signature.
I didn't know about that. Apple says that SIP protects certain folders from modification, nothing more.
Are you not confusing SIP with gatekeeper?
You have seen changes between two reboots, but the difference may not be attributable to SIP.

We know that since Catalina, each app gets verified upon first launch. But that only happens once after each app update. What is SIP supposed to do that would slow down the launch of Office apps each and every time?
 

Leon1das

macrumors 6502
Dec 26, 2020
285
214
I didn't know about that. Apple says that SIP protects certain folders from modification, nothing more.
Are you not confusing SIP with gatekeeper?
You have seen changes between two reboots, but the difference may not be attributable to SIP.

We know that since Catalina, each app gets verified upon first launch. But that only happens once after each app update. What is SIP supposed to do that would slow down the launch of Office apps each and every time?
Apple's description of SIP differs between what they say to regular users vs description they give for developers.. I dont have the links (texting from mobile) - but description for developers is more detailed...

To support that SIP is not just a folder blocker - if you disable SIP, on M1 Macs all iOS apps will stop working...

In any case - I dont advise SIP disabling, but how it scans now - may have room for improvement, versus blaming app developers.
 

jeanlain

macrumors 68020
Mar 14, 2009
2,462
958
Apple's description of SIP differs between what they say to regular users vs description they give for developers.. I dont have the links (texting from mobile) - but description for developers is more detailed...
You're right, apple says
The system automatically authorizes apps that the user downloads from the App Store. The system also authorizes apps that a developer notarizes and distributes directly to users. The system prevents the launching of all other apps by default.
So SIP has something to do with controlling installed apps. I'm not sure what it does beyond the verification that occurs the first time an app is launched, but if it's causing Office apps to take much longer to launch, they're something wrong somewhere.
 

jeanlain

macrumors 68020
Mar 14, 2009
2,462
958
FWIW, I've tried on my 2015 Macbook air with and without SIP, and saw no difference in launch times. Word takes 9 bounces, Excel 5, PPT 4 and outlook 6. Note: this is on Catalina, after restarting the Mac, disabling Wifi and making sure the CPU and SSD are at idle.
 

turbineseaplane

macrumors P6
Mar 19, 2008
17,400
40,188
FWIW, I've tried on my 2015 Macbook air with and without SIP, and saw no difference in launch times. Word takes 9 bounces, Excel 5, PPT 4 and outlook 6. Note: this is on Catalina, after restarting the Mac, disabling Wifi and making sure the CPU and SSD are at idle.

I'm sure it's really just lazy Microsoft quite honestly...

(the usual from them)
 

etn

macrumors member
Feb 7, 2013
42
16
The kind of data you are talking about should be in a database, not a spreadsheet.
Fully agree with you. But as stated in my previous posts, many companies (mine included) have us work on the data with Excel because „this is what we have“ and any other/better tool would cost extra. It sucks but I do not see it changing anytime soon. Heck, for some heavy database crunching I programmmed my own Python scripts, which is free but time intensive.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SlCKB0Y

Quackington

macrumors 6502a
Aug 12, 2010
546
314
England, UK
Is anyone using a non-365 version of Office on an M1? I've never bothered with 365, I just paid for 2019 (and 2011 and 2016 before that), one-off cost suits my use case a lot better. I'm interested in knowing how 2019 runs via Rosetta.
 

bsmr

macrumors 65816
Oct 4, 2005
1,136
301
Germany
Note that users who install Office 365 from the AppStore will not see the impact - as SIP is lighter towards these apps.
Tried it. It's the same, as MS direct download.

Bumping 7 times to open first time after reboot.
MS direct download and app Store Download from macOS the same.

But fewer background services with macOS App Store Version - so it's a keeper for me, as I don't need MS Auto Update service and other stuff.
 

Peepo

macrumors 65816
Jun 18, 2009
1,174
627
Tried it. It's the same, as MS direct download.

Bumping 7 times to open first time after reboot.
MS direct download and app Store Download from macOS the same.

But fewer background services with macOS App Store Version - so it's a keeper for me, as I don't need MS Auto Update service and other stuff.
I tried also and same result. I reverted to the download version from Microsoft.
 

Sarpanch

macrumors regular
Jan 12, 2013
138
127
SoCal
Is anyone using a non-365 version of Office on an M1? I've never bothered with 365, I just paid for 2019 (and 2011 and 2016 before that), one-off cost suits my use case a lot better. I'm interested in knowing how 2019 runs via Rosetta.

Office 2019 for MAC was updated to Universal binary in the latest update. Runs really well. Like others have mentioned, it takes a few seconds to launch after a reboot, but almost instantaneous after that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quackington

Leon1das

macrumors 6502
Dec 26, 2020
285
214
Is anyone using a non-365 version of Office on an M1? I've never bothered with 365, I just paid for 2019 (and 2011 and 2016 before that), one-off cost suits my use case a lot better. I'm interested in knowing how 2019 runs via Rosetta.
Office 2019 is Universal binary (both Intel and M1) from the version 16.44, so native M1 support without Rosetta
 
  • Like
Reactions: Quackington

MacBird

macrumors 65816
Apr 1, 2010
1,315
1,714
After installing 16.44 on a non-Silicon 2017 MBP, MS Office apps start much slower, it went from 8 bounces to 13 bounces.
 

Aggedor

macrumors 6502a
Dec 10, 2020
799
939
Resurrecting an old thread here. I've just installed Office on my new MBA M1, and can see that while the main apps are all Apple Silicon native, OneDrive is still showing as Intel in the Activity Viewer.

OneDrive is currently being a total pig - unresponsive beachball most of the time - but was wondering whether there is an Apple Silicon version in the fast track/insider track option for users? I've never used anything other than the standard releases of Office, but OneDrive is driving me bananas.
 

KPOM

macrumors P6
Oct 23, 2010
18,311
8,324
Resurrecting an old thread here. I've just installed Office on my new MBA M1, and can see that while the main apps are all Apple Silicon native, OneDrive is still showing as Intel in the Activity Viewer.

OneDrive is currently being a total pig - unresponsive beachball most of the time - but was wondering whether there is an Apple Silicon version in the fast track/insider track option for users? I've never used anything other than the standard releases of Office, but OneDrive is driving me bananas.
It’s still Intel in the fast track, as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aggedor

darkharbour

macrumors member
Nov 12, 2020
55
105
Unceded Wolastoqey Territory
Does anyone have any word on when Teams might be updated to ARM? I'm tired of having to constantly run a non-native app for work all day, it works fine but is definitely more of a resource drain than it should be. Given how much better Outlook, Excel, and Word got with native support, I'm anxious to see Teams and OneDrive join the fray.
 

macintoshmac

Suspended
May 13, 2010
6,089
6,994
That's not going to give you a very accurate test result. The second time you open a program will always be faster than the first time after a reboot. Even with closing the program, things are still cached. You'd get a much more accurate result if you did a reboot in between.

Exactly. A surprising number of people don't know these tiny things about how operating systems work, but get into reviewing performance this way, inadvertently dishing out incorrect information to their audience on account of their not knowing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Runs For Fun

macintoshmac

Suspended
May 13, 2010
6,089
6,994
I would reboot if that is my usage pattern but it isn’t - I don’t reboot both my Intel-based MBP and M1-based MBP. It just doesn’t make sense to reboot unless there is a software update that forces the laptop to reboot. I just close the lid when I am done and open the lid when I want to work - for that usage pattern, M1 works really great and is much much quicker than an Intel-based MBA or MBP.

It makes sense to reboot if you want to provide (or care about) an accurate comparison to your audience. If all you want to do is show how you use it and how you feel about it, that is another thing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Runs For Fun

Aggedor

macrumors 6502a
Dec 10, 2020
799
939
Does anyone have any word on when Teams might be updated to ARM? I'm tired of having to constantly run a non-native app for work all day, it works fine but is definitely more of a resource drain than it should be. Given how much better Outlook, Excel, and Word got with native support, I'm anxious to see Teams and OneDrive join the fray.
For Teams, I've always found it runs better in a web browser than as an app - this also applies to Windows 10! Have you tried that for performance?
 

Aggedor

macrumors 6502a
Dec 10, 2020
799
939
That's a great tip, I had forgotten about that! Too bad the browser v version doesn't support calls/videoconferencing, that's the biggest stumbling block.
The browser v version? Not sure what you are referring to. I use the browser version of Team for video conferences all day long. I've completely uninstalled the app from both my Windows and Mac machines.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.