Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

yoda13

macrumors 65816
Sep 26, 2003
1,468
2
Texas
jsw said:
Hopefully, those benchmarks will be forthcoming from others. I think I'm going to return mine when the store gets some with more RAM, which they've promised will come. There's no sales tax in NH, so it behooves me to buy from the Store if at all possible.


Dang it JSW. I don't blame you, but I was really looking forward to your report.:p
 

xterm

macrumors newbie
Feb 24, 2006
29
0
Trying mission Impossible Superbowl Trailer from trailers.apple

720P plays at full frame rate, no problems.

trying 1080P now

It will take a while as I only have 512K ADSL...
 

yoda13

macrumors 65816
Sep 26, 2003
1,468
2
Texas
tjwett said:
this is from MacInTouch's early review of the Intel mini...

"Your Mac Mini does not have any user-serviceable parts."

eek. i hope that doesn't mean we can't at least add some RAM like in the old one? even if it means prying it open with a putty knife?

Does that mean that we can't even add RAM to it? I don't like that either, because it means I will have to pay Apple their full overinflated price for RAM. Oh well, nothing is perfect. If this graphics chipset isn't a total dog, I still want one.
 

risc

macrumors 68030
Jul 23, 2004
2,756
0
Melbourne, Australia
xterm said:
1080P does not drop any frames either!

Time to sell my Dual G5 + nVidia 6800 Ultra DDL then seems like a waste of money when a $600 machine can play H.264 just as well. :rolleyes: (btw the :rolleyes: is for how lame Apples PPC video drivers are not you).
 

tjwett

macrumors 68000
Original poster
May 6, 2002
1,880
0
Brooklyn, NYC
yoda13 said:
Does that mean that we can't even add RAM to it? I don't like that either, because it means I will have to pay Apple their full overinflated price for RAM. Oh well, nothing is perfect. If this graphics chipset isn't a total dog, I still want one.

well i'm trying to figure it out now before mine ships so i can beef it up to 2GB CTO before they get it out the door. it could very well be that the RAM in the original minis was also considered to not be a user serviceable part. anyone with a PPC mini that can confirm or deny this?
 

risc

macrumors 68030
Jul 23, 2004
2,756
0
Melbourne, Australia
yoda13 said:
Wow. That suprises the heck out of me. I am in a state of disbelief. I was not expecting this...:confused:

I'd like to see it confirmed since I've used these integrated video cards in Windows before and there is no way in hell they can even play 720p. This was on dual core CPUs before you ask. Both wmv hd and H.264 sucked using this integrated Intel, so if this is true it is damn right amazing imo.
 

admanimal

macrumors 68040
Apr 22, 2005
3,531
2
Am I the only one who got a Solo model? It will be interesting to see how well it does in comparison.
 

admanimal

macrumors 68040
Apr 22, 2005
3,531
2
tjwett said:
Apple+Shift+3 - it will snap a png image to your desktop.

There's also Apple+Shift+4 which lets you select the rectangle to grab, or Apple+Shift+4 then Spacebar which lets you select a particular window to grab.

I'm almost certain that PPC Mini's were not officially user serviceable either. I doubt Apple would promote prying off the lid with two thin putty knives, which I think is pretty much the only way people have been able to get it open.
 

yoda13

macrumors 65816
Sep 26, 2003
1,468
2
Texas
risc said:
I'd like to see it confirmed since I've used these integrated video cards in Windows before and there is no way in hell they can even play 720p. This was on dual core CPUs before you ask. Both wmv hd and H.264 sucked using this integrated Intel, so if this is true it is damn right amazing imo.

Could the Apple drivers for this card make this much difference in the performance that it is capable of?
 

jsw

Moderator emeritus
Mar 16, 2004
22,910
44
Andover, MA
admanimal said:
Am I the only one who got a Solo model? It will be interesting to see how well it does in comparison.
I would suspect it'll actually be pretty competitive. :)
 

tjwett

macrumors 68000
Original poster
May 6, 2002
1,880
0
Brooklyn, NYC
admanimal said:
There's also Apple+Shift+4 which lets you select the rectangle to grab, or Apple+Shift+4 then Spacebar which lets you select a particular window to grab.

let's not confuse the man! he's got important work to do. ;) xterm, i'd like to see you run XBench with the hard disk and memory options disabled, along with the beam sync thing off. please?
 

risc

macrumors 68030
Jul 23, 2004
2,756
0
Melbourne, Australia
yoda13 said:
Could the Apple drivers for this card make this much difference in the performance that it is capable of?

What I'd like to know even more is - If this is the case why the hell do my nVidia 6800 Ultra DDL drivers suck so badly? Considering my DDL cost more than a Mac Mini.
 

jsw

Moderator emeritus
Mar 16, 2004
22,910
44
Andover, MA
tjwett said:
let's not confuse the man! he's got important work to do. ;) xterm, i'd like to see you run XBench with the hard disk and memory options disabled, along with the beam sync thing off. please?
iMac 17" 128MB/2GB/160 GB for comparison using those settings:
Code:
Results	[b]121.80[/b]	
	System Info		
		Xbench Version		1.2
		System Version		10.4.5 (8G1454)
		Physical RAM		2048 MB
		Model		iMac4,1
		Drive Type		Maxtor 6L160M0
	CPU Test	69.90	
		GCD Loop	238.48	12.57 Mops/sec
		Floating Point Basic	83.34	1.98 Gflop/sec
		vecLib FFT	40.04	1.32 Gflop/sec
		Floating Point Library	62.28	10.84 Mops/sec
	Thread Test	178.36	
		Computation	163.02	3.30 Mops/sec, 4 threads
		Lock Contention	196.88	8.47 Mlocks/sec, 4 threads
	Quartz Graphics Test	105.96	
		Line	103.15	6.87 Klines/sec [50% alpha]
		Rectangle	114.75	34.26 Krects/sec [50% alpha]
		Circle	113.30	9.24 Kcircles/sec [50% alpha]
		Bezier	112.64	2.84 Kbeziers/sec [50% alpha]
		Text	90.28	5.65 Kchars/sec
	OpenGL Graphics Test	131.23	
		Spinning Squares	131.23	166.47 frames/sec
	User Interface Test	245.15	
		Elements	245.15	1.13 Krefresh/sec
 

xterm

macrumors newbie
Feb 24, 2006
29
0


I had to make the window a tiny bit smaller to fit it all on the screen, click the image in image shack to see full res
 

tjwett

macrumors 68000
Original poster
May 6, 2002
1,880
0
Brooklyn, NYC
xterm said:


I had to make the window a tiny bit smaller to fit it all on the screen, click the image in image shack to see full res

nice! so are you on the stock Core Solo with 512 RAM?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.