Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Olympics camera collections.
- Thread starter Apple fanboy
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
I agree that these days things aren't going to be getting dated as fast and the technology, while still bringing out new features and functionality isn't moving at quite such a seemingly dizzying pace as in the early days of DSLRs. It felt as though we went rather quickly from the D70 to the D200 followed by the D2 and D3 and D300 in fairly rapid succession. It seemed as though in the early days there was a lot of talk about gear because, well, manufacturers were bringing out so much new stuff for us to think about and to contemplate purchasing and using.
Cropping definitely is useful in many cases but indeed the ideal is to have as much image as possible -- filling the frame, so to speak -- with the actual subject (easier to attain with a long lens, either a prime or a zoom) rather than trying to shoot a bird high up in the sky with a too-short lens and then cropping the bejeezus out of the image, eliminating much of that pesky sky in an effort to show the bird in detail, as there just isn't going to be any detail.
I find that when I shoot the birds out on the lake that there are times when I need to gently remove (i.e., crop out) part of a goose or hooded merganser or duck that wandered half-in, half-out of the scene just as I was focusing on my primary subject. THAT's when higher resolution can be useful in shooting wildlife.
The longer the lens, the greater chances one has of getting "closer" to the subject and also having a really nice DOF and nice background as well. Long prime lenses such as Sony's 600mm f/4 GM, at nearly $13,000 before (US) tax, are wonderful for shooting sports and wildlife, and with that f/4 aperture it works well with either a 1.4x TC or a 2.0x TC as well, extending the distance and reach without much penalty. The thing is heavy, though -- over 6.5 pounds, which can be a bit problematic for toting around! If one spends a lot of time out in the areas where they'll find wildlife and has the physical ability to carry the gear to the site, or is regularly shooting local or national sports events, then the 600mm would be an ideal purchase, well worth the expenditure.
No idea as I haven't looked at them, but I wouldn't be surprised, as from posts I have seen on Nikon Cafe the PF lenses are very popular, especially the 500mm one. With the current chip shortage situation now, too, chances are that they, along with many other lenses, are presently on backorder in many camera shops.
Actually I think Nikon stopped taking anymore back orders. That’s how bad it is.
Yes indeed, the PF lenses are lovely (and lighter). The manual focus 500mm is like carrying around a boulder
. I bet that 300 f/2.8 was fantastic!
Sigma just announced a 150-600 f/5-6.3 for E and L mounts. $1500, which is not bad at all if it holds up. Still more heft than I care for, but that's unavoidable in FF long lenses. If weight wasn't a concern, I could see myself liking this plus an S5.
For some reason I have never been all that fond of Sigma lenses. I tried various ones through the years and always ended up selling them or trading them in on something else. They just felt bulky and awkward to me and I wasn't terribly pleased with the results I was getting, either. Now, that was some years ago and maybe (probably) things have changed, but I still tend to stay away from Sigma.....
In any event, in this situation I am perfectly happy with my native Sony lens 200-600mm!
In any event, in this situation I am perfectly happy with my native Sony lens 200-600mm!
Last edited:
Understand my comment was a little tongue in cheek or pot calling the kettle black… Remember want and need are synonyms to my brain.
What if for the A1, it is that the A1ii is likely about to pop out of the R&D pipe and should supply chain recover, then Sony will be chomping at the bit shifting A1 inventory waiting an “acceptable” amount of time to release the new one? Having said that I think the A7Rxx is next most likely for refresh isn’t it? Not sure how they can step up from the A7RIV mind you.
I'll bet there is indeed already an A1 II or an A2 in the pipeline even as Sony is busily still trying to meet the demand for the A1! Rumors have been around for a while about the A7III going to be updated with an A7IV and yet there's still no sign of an actual camera arriving on the scene. A lot of people have been waiting for that one! Yes, A7R IV has already had a minor "update" in that they refreshed the LCD screen or the EVF, something, and are charging another $500.00 for that on top of whatever the current pricing is for the A7R IV. Needless to say I'm not going to be bothering with that!
Lol. I read WEX and I just think of work. One of our customers.