Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

zoran

macrumors 601
Original poster
Jun 30, 2005
4,791
132
+2.
I thought about maybe getting one for my wife.... but not with a glossy screen. No way.

well why waste it? you could hand that glossy screen iMac over to your mother in law... :D:D:D:D:D:D

Jeez oh man, I just can't take all this whining about the glossy screens. Have any of you ever used one? Honestly, my PC laptop :)eek:) has a glossy screen, and it sits with a window right behind me. Even during the brightest parts of the day I can still easily read text, etc. And all this is coming from a "lesser" screen manufacturer :rolleyes:

Stop whining. Get over it, they are decent screens and every one of you would realize it if you would just give them a chance.
Apparently u have not been using a glossy screen on a professional environment where youd have to be infront of the display for over 8hours a day!

If they do the same with the ACDs they can kiss display sales goodbye.
They better not or theyll loose my respect for eva! :mad:
 

spac3man

macrumors newbie
Aug 7, 2007
11
0
As I mentioned in a another thread.

As a future Graphic Designer its a major deal breaker:mad:. No way I'm going back to glossy since my old CRT 5 years ago.
 

zoran

macrumors 601
Original poster
Jun 30, 2005
4,791
132
As I mentioned in a another thread.
As a future Graphic Designer its a major deal breaker:mad:. No way I'm going back to glossy since my old CRT 5 years ago.
Well as far as im concerned, as an active Graphic Designer, theres no way im going to glossy for professional work either!
 

nakile

macrumors regular
Jun 30, 2007
151
0
Yes, never a fan of reflective screens.

I mean, have you seen those CRT monitors? Holy crap. It's amazing that the computer industry didn't fail because of that awful glare. :rolleyes:

I think we are complaining about nothing. If the glare is so bad to blind you, then you have to much light in the room and wouldn't be able to see the screen anyway.

I've used demo computers in department stores with giant glossy screens and adjusted in less them a minute. It's not that big of a deal.
 

Sounds Good

macrumors 68000
Jul 8, 2007
1,692
57
I hope so because I don't need a 24" mirror...
You mean like this?:
IMG_0086.JPG
 

iBookG4user

macrumors 604
Jun 27, 2006
6,595
2
Seattle, WA
Yeah, I've used glossy displays before and they are terrible. I can't concentrate while I'm seeing a mirror of everything around me. My parents were considering getting a new iMac soon, but since my parents agree with my opinion on glossy screens. I might have to steer them to a Mac Mini instead with a third party LCD, I wish Apple would give us a choice instead of limiting us to either Glossy or Matte.
 

xBerserker

macrumors member
Jun 4, 2007
59
0
Earth .. for now
I currently have a 20" Intel iMac (non glossy), and I really wanted to upgrade. But I was concerned about the glossy finish so I checked it out at a apple store today and I don't like the glossy screen at all. Give us a matte :apple: Or I'm not upgrading!
 

iW00t

macrumors 68040
Nov 7, 2006
3,286
0
Defenders of Apple Guild
I don't get it. Doesn't Apple know not everyone wants a glossy screen? Why force them to use it? Doing so may make them look elsewhere.

Elsewhere?

Where? Mac users will again buy from Apple unless they want a Hackintosh. PC users generally don't care and will go "Oh look! Shiny!"

An added boon is they may reap some additional Mac Pro/ACD sales as a result of this.

No it doesn't. Unless you have a crappy display.

Besides what is there to try? Glossy doesn't offer any enhancement over matte. You can say "it has rich colors and deeper blacks." But they are far from natural. As a creative platform limiting certain Macs to glossy is ridiculous. If they do the same with the ACDs they can kiss display sales goodbye.

iMac = iProduct

iProduct = for consumers

If your designers need it for doing their work (I believe they are doing it salaried, which by definition makes them professional designers) they should be buying a Mac Pro or a Macbook Pro.

iProducts are not advertised to be fit for any professional purposes!

Doesn't glossy distort pictures to an extent? How will photographers work on this?

Most consumers do not care about distortion. The colour lab at Walmart will correct for it anyway... NOT.

Professionals shooting weddings on their EOS 1DsIIs do.
 

86047

macrumors regular
Oct 7, 2006
174
0
Jeez oh man, I just can't take all this whining about the glossy screens. Have any of you ever used one? Honestly, my PC laptop :)eek:) has a glossy screen, and it sits with a window right behind me. Even during the brightest parts of the day I can still easily read text, etc. And all this is coming from a "lesser" screen manufacturer :rolleyes:

Stop whining. Get over it, they are decent screens and every one of you would realize it if you would just give them a chance.

We aren't whining about the glossy display. Glossy displays are great for everyday use if you are one of those people who like them (myself included), but for graphics professionals, or even advanced amateurs, color reproduction is extremely important, and a true representation of color is needed, not some overly contrasted PC sales gimmick of a display.

If they replace the ACDs with glossy displays, then they can kiss their sales to the Creative customers goodbye, at least in the display area.
 

atari1356

macrumors 68000
Feb 27, 2004
1,582
32
Elsewhere?

Where? Mac users will again buy from Apple unless they want a Hackintosh. PC users generally don't care and will go "Oh look! Shiny!"

An added boon is they may reap some additional Mac Pro/ACD sales as a result of this.

Except that Mac Pro/ACD (or even cheap Dell monitor) will cost up to $1000 more than an iMac (if you upgrade to the better video card).

I can't see myself going that route when the $1000 could be spent on getting a new lens for my camera.

Maybe I'll just buy a used/refurbished 24" iMac with matte screen. Either that, or start looking at Windows PC's (umm... then again, no... I hate Windows too much).
 

japasneezemonk

macrumors 6502
Jun 13, 2005
494
161
Nomad
Look at this comparasion

1046920357_24d4012531_o.jpg

1047772942_cb5d271ddd_o.jpg

These photos prove that the Glossy is still bearable under direct sunlight.

Edit: If you're doing extremely serious print/design projects, you should probably be checking your colors with PANTONE formula guides and Pre-press color proofs. It's one of many ways to assure a consistent print job.
 

iW00t

macrumors 68040
Nov 7, 2006
3,286
0
Defenders of Apple Guild
Except that Mac Pro/ACD (or even cheap Dell monitor) will cost up to $1000 more than an iMac (if you upgrade to the better video card).

I can't see myself going that route when the $1000 could be spent on getting a new lens for my camera.

Maybe I'll just buy a used/refurbished 24" iMac with matte screen. Either that, or start looking at Windows PC's (umm... then again, no... I hate Windows too much).

That $1000 will save you from having to waste another $2800 a couple of years down the road when the screen in your iMac burns out and you need to ditch the entire computer.

With a Mac Pro you can work in style, with 2 monitors!
 

flappo

macrumors regular
Jan 8, 2003
151
0
in the cubicles
i agree , the whole ,all in one is intrinsically flawed as lcd's have a finite life and there's the real chance the backlight will go kaput before the rest of the mac

my imac g4 was working fine apart from the backlight , then my second imac the dc had a screen defect too

i'll never buy another all in one mac
 

daneoni

macrumors G4
Mar 24, 2006
11,841
1,577
That's not direct sunlight, and I don't believe for a second that the 17" is set to the same brightness level as the 15" glossy.

Why not, its a PowerBook which means its brightness will never be on par with the MacBook Pro's
 

sinser

macrumors 6502a
Sep 16, 2003
549
0
THE GLOSSY DISPLAY!!! I hate it, and that's preventing me from buying one. Apple are you listening? Please give us a BTO option for a matte display. I want a computer screen not a mirror.
 

shipdestroyer

macrumors 6502
Jun 5, 2007
267
0
New Hampshire
No it doesn't. Unless you have a crappy display.

Besides what is there to try? Glossy doesn't offer any enhancement over matte. You can say "it has rich colors and deeper blacks." But they are far from natural. As a creative platform limiting certain Macs to glossy is ridiculous. If they do the same with the ACDs they can kiss display sales goodbye.

I don't have any experience with color matching, but I assume that's what display calibration is for.

I do, however, have experience using a Macbook and Macbook Pro in sunlight. In situations like this, the Macbook is much more usable because glossy doesn't refract ambient light.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.