Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
A local celebrity: Red-bellied Woodpecker

PHD_4551-L.jpg

Good photo. Just enough setting but nothing to distract from the bird. Odd it should be called a red-bellied woodpecker though rather than red-headed!
 
Stunning location, but looks like your horizon is a little wonky. A quick fix in LR5.

That's possible, but how can you tell? The only thing that's really parallel to the horizon is the base of the rock pillar. And if it does need fixing, it won't be done in LR5! That's what Aperture's for! :D
 
'Rural Sunset' by Niall B. • Canon EOS 350D • 18mm • ISO 400 • f/13


The sun finally decided to peek it's head out with just seconds to spare. Totally caught me off guard!
 
Good photo. Just enough setting but nothing to distract from the bird. Odd it should be called a red-bellied woodpecker though rather than red-headed!

Thanks Ish. The name is a bit confusing but there is another species of woodpecker with a distinctly red head that is called a "Red-headed Woodpecker". I suppose he got to the name first.

The guy in my shot has a just a hint of red on his belly.

~ Peter
 
Thanks Ish. The name is a bit confusing but there is another species of woodpecker with a distinctly red head that is called a "Red-headed Woodpecker". I suppose he got to the name first.

The guy in my shot has a just a hint of red on his belly.

~ Peter

Ok, the quoted one could be a Redder-headed woodpecker? :)
 
The water line doesn't sit level. I've never used aperture so couldn't comment.

I see, the problem is that the waterline in the background is not actually parallel to the horizon... it recedes from the foreground (left) into the distant (right)... hence the angle. The only thing that you can reference in that image to ensure it's "square" to the horizon are the rock pillar which I tried to make sure was sitting properly upright in the frame and not leaning to either side.
 
Last edited:
Today's shot is not too great, but is relatively fresh and comes with a nice plug for a great spot in Toronto: Allan Gardens. As big as the world is, there seem to be quite a few people from Toronto here, so if you're sick of the winter cold, drop by this beautiful public botanic conservatory (free admission :D) and smell the flowers.

The shot was taken with my newly acquired Nikonos V, and its manual 35mm lens. Let me tell you, shooting without autofocus and a TTL viewfinder is tough! The minimal focal distance of this lens is 80 cm, and clearly, I don't have a good perception of how small those centimetres are. If I stood back just 10 cm this would have been close to perfect, but now it's a near miss. Next time will bring a tape measure ;)


Almost there by FriskyFreeze, on Flickr
 
That's possible, but how can you tell? The only thing that's really parallel to the horizon is the base of the rock pillar. And if it does need fixing, it won't be done in LR5! That's what Aperture's for! :D

Hmmm...I was looking at your photo, and found it in balance. There is nothing you can do to make it level; it's already so.
 
I see, the problem is that the waterline in the background is not actually parallel to the horizon... it recedes from the foreground (left) into the distant (right)... hence the angle. The only thing that you can reference in that image to ensure it's "square" to the horizon are the rock pillar which I tried to make sure was sitting properly upright in the frame and not leaning to either side.

It was just how it appeared to me. Still a great photo of a great location though. I'd love to do some travelling this year but my work family commitments make it difficult.
Here's mine for today. With my 18-55mm lens this really was a bit too far away. I'd have been happier if I had court the girl in blue going across as the she would have stood out more from the background.
 
escalators in the London tube always seemed to me extremely steep in comparison to other countries


Is that right? I can't say I've experienced other country's tube escalators to compare. Some of them are pretty vertiginous though!
 
Is that right? I can't say I've experienced other country's tube escalators to compare. Some of them are pretty vertiginous though!

Here ya go ...The Dupont Circle Metro stop in Washington D.C.. Sorta like the descent into Hades , except instead of meeting Charon , you get on the Red Line .....

descent3a.jpg
[
 
Here ya go ...The Dupont Circle Metro stop in Washington D.C.. Sorta like the descent into Hades , except instead of meeting Charon , you get on the Red Line .....


That's a pretty portentous looking opening of cavernous proportions. I like it.
 
This is actually old--taken in 2008 on a trip to Hawaii. Revisited this series to post examples for another thread. There was this sandal maker (cobbler?) in Maui who hand-crafts leather sandals that are simple and in his view reflect the Roman style.

D300 and 18-200 lens. Was shooting in JPEG back then and bumped up the saturation (didn't know any better and was taking advice from Ken Rockwell's site at the time).

Had forgotten this photo, but kind of like it. Including the EXIF data largely out of a sense of nostalgia--images either work or they don't, shouldn't matter to most what gear you use. But in this case it was long enough ago that I thought people might find it interesting given the advances in technology since then :)

12953431623_a25929a4d6_c.jpg

Nikon D300 18-200 @ 44mm, ISO 1100 f/4.5 1/125 sec.
 
I give you the Wolf of Wardour Street..

I know it may not exactly be a wolf but its what came to mind..



Kit used:
Canon 600d
Sigma 18-35mm F1.8
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.