Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

zerosnipe

macrumors member
Jan 27, 2003
45
0
USA
Tahoe's are great trucks too, though I prefer the last generation styling and interior setup. However, If I had extra money to blow I'd buy a used Escalade. The '02-'06's are becoming extremely cheap.

My dad has had a 04 Escalade and the thing was alright but his 07 he has now is a whole lot nicer. The bodystyle I like alot more, and the interior is leaps and bounds above the 04, it also has a bigger engine.
 

shfreelance

macrumors 6502a
May 24, 2008
685
1
Eustis, FL
My dad has had a 04 Escalade and the thing was alright but his 07 he has now is a whole lot nicer. The bodystyle I like alot more, and the interior is leaps and bounds above the 04, it also has a bigger engine.

I never like the 02-06 Excalade, or the 99-00 either. I do like the new Excalades and GMC Denalli over the Tahoe. The new Excalades and Denalli seem more of a cruising truck then a work truck, there to pretty. But the 02-06 Chevy Tahoe and GMC Yukon, are very nice and are not over nice. To me I like them the best, I am not afraid to get down and dirty in them. But that's just me, I prefer those years. I also really love the 1999 Chevy Tahoe, for some reason.
 

hexonxonx

macrumors 601
Jul 4, 2007
4,610
1
Denver Colorado
I have two cars.

The first is a 2006 Cobalt SS Supercharged. I bought it in March of 2006 and have not regretted it one bit! It is extremely fun to drive and the I get compliments on it almost everytime I take it out.

3157441_2_full.jpg


On Monday, I bought a second Cobalt. This one is non supercharged and is silver moss metallic color with all the avilable options including bluetooth that works with my 3G iPhone. I don't have a pic yet. It's a 2009.
 

Mr Kram

macrumors 68020
Oct 1, 2008
2,388
1,239
here's my current garage




The E63 is my dream car, one day I will own it. I must ask though, which one do you like better the M5 or E63? The E63 is quicker but which one is better?

the e63 is a comfortable cruiser with lots of torque and a 7 speed auto. this is my choice for driving around town and if you have a lot of traffic.

the m5 is a beast that requires your full attention. it doesn't have as much torque down low, but it screams all the way from 4000 rpm to its modified 8400 rpm redline. the ride is also much stiffer. this is the car i choose if i'll be on clear freeway for an extended period of time or if i want to take a weekend cruise through the canyons.

fwiw, i just took the m5 on a weekend trip to vegas. this car screams to be driven. i hit 110 mph in third gear and it was pulling hard with no end in sight. i also got 19 mpg averaging about 85 mph the whole trip.
 

wesg

macrumors regular
Jan 2, 2008
211
0
Toronto, ON
Here's me in our old 2004 Tribute sloshing through the water :D
tribute_water.jpg


It has since been replaced with a 2008 Tribute (this isn't an actual photo of our car)
2008tribute.jpg


My dad also drives a 2006 BMW 325i (again, not my car but nearly identical)
2006325i.JPG
 

Tottenham4Life

macrumors member
Aug 20, 2008
52
0
Los Angeles, CA
the e63 is a comfortable cruiser with lots of torque and a 7 speed auto. this is my choice for driving around town and if you have a lot of traffic.

the m5 is a beast that requires your full attention. it doesn't have as much torque down low, but it screams all the way from 4000 rpm to its modified 8400 rpm redline. the ride is also much stiffer. this is the car i choose if i'll be on clear freeway for an extended period of time or if i want to take a weekend cruise through the canyons.

fwiw, i just took the m5 on a weekend trip to vegas. this car screams to be driven. i hit 110 mph in third gear and it was pulling hard with no end in sight. i also got 19 mpg averaging about 85 mph the whole trip.


Is that Northridge FC and Top of Topanga in those pictures?
 

ryannel2003

macrumors 68000
Jan 30, 2005
1,815
388
Greenville, NC
My dad has had a 04 Escalade and the thing was alright but his 07 he has now is a whole lot nicer. The bodystyle I like alot more, and the interior is leaps and bounds above the 04, it also has a bigger engine.

Yeah I work at the local Cadillac dealership and it is definitely a much nicer truck. Drives so much better, and the interior looks like a real Cadillac should. However, I feel the seats are not nearly as comfortable and plush. It seems lately that Cadillac is trying to go for a German type seat (aka BMW), whereas the older Cadillac's (my Seville) has a comfortable, plush leather seat that is like sitting in a couch. I prefer the latter...

Thanks! I need to get it up into your neck of the woods soon. New Bern's got some really beautiful spots.:)

The weather has been terrible here lately. It was cold last week, which I absolutely loved. Then this week, it's raining and it's 85 degrees. If you take it off road, be sure to go back in the Croatan. Be careful though: there are some treacherous spots back there.
 

ryannel2003

macrumors 68000
Jan 30, 2005
1,815
388
Greenville, NC
I never like the 02-06 Excalade, or the 99-00 either. I do like the new Excalades and GMC Denalli over the Tahoe. The new Excalades and Denalli seem more of a cruising truck then a work truck, there to pretty. But the 02-06 Chevy Tahoe and GMC Yukon, are very nice and are not over nice. To me I like them the best, I am not afraid to get down and dirty in them. But that's just me, I prefer those years. I also really love the 1999 Chevy Tahoe, for some reason.

My mom had a '99 Surburban, '01 and '05 Yukon XL, and currently has an '08 Denali. The '01 had the most comfortable seat (for some reason, GM took lumbar off the '05 SLT model and that made it uncomfortable on longer trips), the '99 had the most room, and the '05 has been the most reliable so far. Went through a transmission in the '99 and '01 ('99 at 75k, '01 at 36k), '99 had problems with audio and few other things. The '08 is my favorite though. Comfortable, stylish, powerful, and lots of toys. However, I do have a soft spot for that old Suburban. Saw a '95 the other day with 350k miles on it. They just don't build 'em like they used to.
 

jecapaga

macrumors 601
Jul 1, 2007
4,291
24
Southern California
My mom had a '99 Surburban, '01 and '05 Yukon XL, and currently has an '08 Denali. The '01 had the most comfortable seat (for some reason, GM took lumbar off the '05 SLT model and that made it uncomfortable on longer trips), the '99 had the most room, and the '05 has been the most reliable so far. Went through a transmission in the '99 and '01 ('99 at 75k, '01 at 36k), '99 had problems with audio and few other things. The '08 is my favorite though. Comfortable, stylish, powerful, and lots of toys. However, I do have a soft spot for that old Suburban. Saw a '95 the other day with 350k miles on it. They just don't build 'em like they used to.

Sorry but I couldn't help but comment on the 'they just don't build them like they use to' with an american car from '99. I expected that from something from the 70's. American cars have sucked, I've thought forever.
 

840quadra

Moderator
Staff member
Feb 1, 2005
9,481
6,377
Twin Cities Minnesota
My mum owns this car, though it is a 1998 model (1.8t). I found it is pretty low on power with a big flat spot in the middle of it's RPM range, although I don't notice any turbo lag; it seems pretty linear.

Is yours 230hp atw? That seems pretty high compared to the stock figure of 148hp. What mods have you done?

It should read 220hp (Actually 219.7 but I rounded up :eek: ) .


The car has quite a few modifications, but has a stock block and head.

image.php
 

ryannel2003

macrumors 68000
Jan 30, 2005
1,815
388
Greenville, NC
Sorry but I couldn't help but comment on the 'they just don't build them like they use to' with an american car from '99. I expected that from something from the 70's. American cars have sucked, I've thought forever.

The old Suburban's were pretty bulletproof. The newer Yukon XL's and Suburban's aren't up to par (IMO) to the '93-'99 generation.
 

quagmire

macrumors 604
Apr 19, 2004
6,985
2,492
The old Suburban's were pretty bulletproof. The newer Yukon XL's and Suburban's aren't up to par (IMO) to the '93-'99 generation.

That's because the GMT-400's were around forever. :p The GMT-800's are still pretty solid. Ours has not had a major problem yet.
 

Me1000

macrumors 68000
Jul 15, 2006
1,794
4
:)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0401.JPG
    IMG_0401.JPG
    404.7 KB · Views: 87
  • IMG_0402.JPG
    IMG_0402.JPG
    403.4 KB · Views: 90
  • IMG_0448.JPG
    IMG_0448.JPG
    598.1 KB · Views: 101

ryannel2003

macrumors 68000
Jan 30, 2005
1,815
388
Greenville, NC
That's because the GMT-400's were around forever. :p The GMT-800's are still pretty solid. Ours has not had a major problem yet.

Hmmm... now that you put it that way, yeah I'm guessing GM had finally worked all the kinks out by the time they killed it.

Here's another pic of my car; nothing different from last time I posted.

IMG_0435.jpg
 

840quadra

Moderator
Staff member
Feb 1, 2005
9,481
6,377
Twin Cities Minnesota
Some updated images of my 1991 200.

main.php


main.php




I love this car, and it has proven to be a bit of a sleeper even to this day. All stock with the exception of 17" Borbet Type E wheels, European spec headlights, and 1992 Audi S4 seats (larger bolsters, narrower base, and adjustable thigh supports) and a replacement for the stock exhaust system.

Audi imported under 1,500 of these in sedan form, and less than 500 in a wagon. It was only available in a manual, and with Quattro (AWD) in 1991. Car and Driver tested these out at 15.2 in the 1/4 with a top speed of 149 MPH. Not bad for a turbocharged 2.2 liter 20v 5 cylinder engine rated at 217 HP in 1991!

More detailed specifications on these cars can be found here.


wow, that reminds me when i had my rabbit and i put a 2.0l 16v engine in that. that was awesome.

love your car dude.

Thanks, it is good fun!

image.php
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.