Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

EngenZerO

macrumors regular
Aug 16, 2008
176
117
Denver, CO
Lake Haiyaha @ RMNP in Estes, CO.

IMG_0162.jpeg
 

Cscottrun

macrumors 6502a
Oct 8, 2011
545
274
Took these in Acadia National Park (and surrounding area) last weekend. I am a newbie when it comes to photographing (I still use default settings, etc.) but to my eyes, these came out nice, lol. Wanted to share a few more but I'm getting an error that they are too big and not sure how to circumvent that.
Acadia 1.jpg
Acadia 2.jpg
Acadia 7.jpg
 

inuragon

macrumors member
May 10, 2023
94
51
Sorry but that is just wrong. You fail to grasp how important the computational aspect is to digital capture. E.g. Nikon made D3, D4, D5, etc. pro DSLR bodies with Expeed 1, 2, 3, etc. ongoing improvements. The idea that the Nikon D6 (with Expeed 6) performance could be implemented on the Nikon D5 with its Expeed 5 computational capability would be absurd.

The same applies to 14 Pro evolving to 15 Pro. All those additional engineering hours and all those additional transistors on the newer chip have substantive consequences. It is not "entirely possible for Apple to inplement it on the iPhone 14 Pro."

[Of course some upgrades can indeed be back-upgraded in software.]
Even if we assumed the main processing chip was getting used to all it's capacity which seems very unlikely that would still not mean you could not add the features to older phones, it would simply mean you couldn't take pictures as fast.
Unless apple changed cpu architecture it makes no sense that a non realtime processing could not be done on a slower cpu
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.