It has also tempted me away from the cheaper models.
A 2.8Ghz dual-core desktop chip sounds like such a great upgrade from this aging 3Ghz Pentium 4.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
POLL: Prefer old or new iMac design?
- Thread starter netdog
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
It has also tempted me away from the cheaper models.
A 2.8Ghz dual-core desktop chip sounds like such a great upgrade from this aging 3Ghz Pentium 4.
That is the problem, why did they take so long to make a update and then never change the design? After having so long to think about it, why didn't they change it? If they like that design so much (I like it too) why didn't just do some updates earlier?
There should be. OS X should have a built in suggestion box. Or a some sort of polling option. Ever every OS can vote on something once and only once. That would be a great idea.
The Stig
The problem is, its not the same. Its slightly different. It's thinner, it uses different materials, is easy to expand its memory, has a glossy screen and Santa Rosa architecture.
They both pretty much look the same to me, I'm a little indifferent towards both. If I added some bias I might criticize the newer model since I expected a completely different design and all we got was a slight modification of the width and colors, but I don't think it's ugly or anything. I am totally indifferent...
iLamp anyone?
Forget looks, I liked the functionality of the iLamp iMac. Being able to raise, lower, and pivot the screen so easily was very nice. Ergonomically speaking, the iMacs since then have been a mistake. The Leno Chin raises the actual monitor part of the computer much higher than it should be for healthy viewing habits.
Forget looks, I liked the functionality of the iLamp iMac. Being able to raise, lower, and pivot the screen so easily was very nice. Ergonomically speaking, the iMacs since then have been a mistake. The Leno Chin raises the actual monitor part of the computer much higher than it should be for healthy viewing habits.
I think Apple made the mistake of the iLamp being so good that they could not top it. They need to get innovative again not steps back.
5 years ago I was a huge critic of the iLamp but it was much better then what is out now.
I prefer the good old white imac.
The glossy black and aluminium look is far too conventional for an Apple. This design is trend following instead of trend setting.
My Nokia 6300:
My Philips remote:
I am really disapointed. It's also a shame that the Apple remote and the mouse do not match at all with the design of the new imac.
(I did order the new keyboard though, what a beauty. It will match great with my G5!)
The glossy black and aluminium look is far too conventional for an Apple. This design is trend following instead of trend setting.
My Nokia 6300:
My Philips remote:
I am really disapointed. It's also a shame that the Apple remote and the mouse do not match at all with the design of the new imac.
(I did order the new keyboard though, what a beauty. It will match great with my G5!)
I guess, but after taking that long I expected a little bit more than a thinner ugly iMac. SR was a given. They had glossy screens before, it isn't hard to change that.
I guess I just think too much of Apple, I feel a little let down with this update. It doesn't make me want to go out and buy one.
The Stig
I'm disappointed too... The new keyboard on half matches the iMac. The white keys makes not match. Maybe it is suppose to match with the mouse? And all the other white stuff apple puts out. The remotes never match and it always disappointing. I feel bad for people with a Blackbook with their white cables and remote. The remote only bugs me because it sticks to the side of the iMac? I wouldn't want to stick that white remote to the side of my black and metal iMac! NO WAY! It would look so stupid. The keys on the keyboard would be a little bit better if the keys were black, a black mouse would be better too.
It all just isn't like Apple. Is Steve on drugs again or what? I think they should remove the apple symbol and just slap on a dell or Hp logo instead, because that is what it looks like.
The Stig
Because all of us with new machines are busy playing with them so there is no time for a reply. Honestly these things are beautiful, you wont understand until u see it in person!
I suspect the real issue is that the G4 iMac was too expensive to manufacture. Aesthetically, it left something to be desired, but ergonomically it was hard to beat. We'll probably be replacing our G4 iMac with one of the new iMacs, but I'll be sorry to see it go.
Only thing i don't like about the new iMac is that it DOESNT COME IN 17 INCH!! WTF APPLE! It's now impossible to get a Mac computer for less than 1000 bucks. The mini is a great idea, but its too friggen expensive! Once you factor in the display (minus keyboard and mouse) it costs more than an iMac, even with the cheapest LCD you can find on the web. Way to exclude the largest (sub 1000, more than 500) market from you offerings. Yes, I'm an apple fan to the max, but whatever. this made me mad. and i'm just stating my opinion so please don't flame me. my anger is justified
Love the new design tho. SOOO THIN!!
Love the new design tho. SOOO THIN!!
Apple really screwed up on this one!!!
-Remote
-Key buttons
-Glossy
-Black border around screen
-Mouse
-HP/Dell look-a-like
I really don't like the new iMac.
They should have made it look something like this if they wanted the iPhone look:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-d_CHY92Aw
-Remote
-Key buttons
-Glossy
-Black border around screen
-Mouse
-HP/Dell look-a-like
I really don't like the new iMac.
They should have made it look something like this if they wanted the iPhone look:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l-d_CHY92Aw
Mac mini, refurb Macbook, refurb iMac... hacked Apple TV
Are you saying there aren't any LCD monitors to be had for less than $600?
I personally like the new design, even if it does look retro.
My main complaint is the new keyboard together with the new iMac.
It doesn't seem like they match.
My main complaint is the new keyboard together with the new iMac.
It doesn't seem like they match.
Very dissappointed with the new iMac. First reaction: depression. Apple is starting to loose the Mac look, starting to move towards a more PC look. The black just reminds me of a HP monitor. I wouldn't mind this computer if it is from some where other than Apple, but it isn't unforutnately.
Nothing matches with the new iMac other than the keyboard. Actually, it doesn't... Keyboard is white, iMac is black. And the mighty mouse now looks odd with it... Sigh...
If it is alluminium, it should look like their cinema displays. I just hope there is a new redesign next year.
Nothing matches with the new iMac other than the keyboard. Actually, it doesn't... Keyboard is white, iMac is black. And the mighty mouse now looks odd with it... Sigh...
If it is alluminium, it should look like their cinema displays. I just hope there is a new redesign next year.
Wow, have any of you guys actually seen one of these or used one? I personally think they look awesome. I like most everything about them except for the dismal video card. To each his own.
I played with the new iMac at the Apple Store today and don't really care for the design. The biggest thing visually is the black screen border - it does not look a cohesive part of the design.
The deal breaker is the keyboard! It is horrible to use. Even if you decide you can get used to it, if you use any other normal keyboard as well (say, at work), then switching between them will remind you how inferior the new iMac design is.
The deal breaker is the keyboard! It is horrible to use. Even if you decide you can get used to it, if you use any other normal keyboard as well (say, at work), then switching between them will remind you how inferior the new iMac design is.
Definitely not a fan. I think the worse part for me is the back- just an ugly, curved plastic hunk. It's way too Dell.
And I expected more from Apple in a redesign... i mean, look at the jumps in past models. This was nothing more than a re-skin.
And I expected more from Apple in a redesign... i mean, look at the jumps in past models. This was nothing more than a re-skin.
love it.
the old white ones hurt my eyes. Honestly, I wasn't that impressed when I saw the new design, but in person it is really gorgeous. The keyboard is just amazing and I really like the black back as well. One of the interesting aspects of the design is that since black retreats vs silver it can look like there is simply just an apple shaped hole instead of there actually being a black apple logo.
I've been waiting for a new mac ever since they announced the intel switch and I am very happy with my new computer!
the old white ones hurt my eyes. Honestly, I wasn't that impressed when I saw the new design, but in person it is really gorgeous. The keyboard is just amazing and I really like the black back as well. One of the interesting aspects of the design is that since black retreats vs silver it can look like there is simply just an apple shaped hole instead of there actually being a black apple logo.
I've been waiting for a new mac ever since they announced the intel switch and I am very happy with my new computer!
Apple's been moving towards the computer as the focus of a home entertainment center for the last few years now. Part of that is going for a consistent look, both in their applications and in their computers, and apparently in their phones and iPod products. It's pretty well known that photos and videos look better against black backdrops plus glossy screens. So towards that goal, the consumer-oriented computers have been designed with photos and video in mind.
There's a reason why photo applications have black backgrounds and why TV sets have black borders. It's because they enhance the picture that's on the screen with greater contrast. It's the same way with the iMac. White doesn't cut it because it detracts from the picture on the actual monitor.
I personally like the new design very much. I like hearing how this will be great for viewing photos and video because that's much of what I do. Color accuracy isn't a big deal for me because I'm colorblind anyway. But I do love the look of the screen on my glossy MacBook Pro compared to the previous MBP I owned with a matte screen (yawn). Yes, I deliberately chose glossy and went elsewhere when the first Apple Store I went to said they had only matte MBP's. I wish I could trade my matte 30" Cinema Display (attached to a Mac Pro) in for a glossy 30" Cinema Display.
There are only two things I don't like about the current design. While the chin is a bit smaller, they didn't really lower the height of the 24" version; rather they just left more space between the chin and the desk. The new 20" iMac I bought will end up in a confined space with only 1/2" to spare on the top. I wish that Apple had allowed the screen to be lowered on the 24" model so I could have gotten one of those to fit in that confined space. A 24" glossy model would have been gorgeous.
The second thing I don't like is the inability to easily access the hard drive so I could replace it when the current one gets cramped. With the nearly 40,000 RAW-sized photos I have plus video and a Boot Camp partition, a 250GB drive gets mighty cramped, requiring me to get a 500GB external drive to hold my Aperture library. With the new machine, I got the biggest drive I could, the 750GB drive for the 20" and had to pay extortionist prices for the upgrade. A 750GB drive can be had for $180, but I ended up giving back a 320GB drive and getting the 750GB one for a lot more than the drive alone would have cost me. I build my own Windows PC's and hack just about every piece of hardware I have (including drives on MBP's, two Apple TV's, and drives on Mac Minis), but the thought of cracking open an iMac without breaking it seemed too daunting.
For those who don't like the glossy display, why not just pop off the glass? It's a matte screen underneath it and the glass is apparently not sealed on that tightly. I think I read the glass was held on by 16 tiny magnets, though I'm not sure how the glass was made magnetic.
There's a reason why photo applications have black backgrounds and why TV sets have black borders. It's because they enhance the picture that's on the screen with greater contrast. It's the same way with the iMac. White doesn't cut it because it detracts from the picture on the actual monitor.
I personally like the new design very much. I like hearing how this will be great for viewing photos and video because that's much of what I do. Color accuracy isn't a big deal for me because I'm colorblind anyway. But I do love the look of the screen on my glossy MacBook Pro compared to the previous MBP I owned with a matte screen (yawn). Yes, I deliberately chose glossy and went elsewhere when the first Apple Store I went to said they had only matte MBP's. I wish I could trade my matte 30" Cinema Display (attached to a Mac Pro) in for a glossy 30" Cinema Display.
There are only two things I don't like about the current design. While the chin is a bit smaller, they didn't really lower the height of the 24" version; rather they just left more space between the chin and the desk. The new 20" iMac I bought will end up in a confined space with only 1/2" to spare on the top. I wish that Apple had allowed the screen to be lowered on the 24" model so I could have gotten one of those to fit in that confined space. A 24" glossy model would have been gorgeous.
The second thing I don't like is the inability to easily access the hard drive so I could replace it when the current one gets cramped. With the nearly 40,000 RAW-sized photos I have plus video and a Boot Camp partition, a 250GB drive gets mighty cramped, requiring me to get a 500GB external drive to hold my Aperture library. With the new machine, I got the biggest drive I could, the 750GB drive for the 20" and had to pay extortionist prices for the upgrade. A 750GB drive can be had for $180, but I ended up giving back a 320GB drive and getting the 750GB one for a lot more than the drive alone would have cost me. I build my own Windows PC's and hack just about every piece of hardware I have (including drives on MBP's, two Apple TV's, and drives on Mac Minis), but the thought of cracking open an iMac without breaking it seemed too daunting.
For those who don't like the glossy display, why not just pop off the glass? It's a matte screen underneath it and the glass is apparently not sealed on that tightly. I think I read the glass was held on by 16 tiny magnets, though I'm not sure how the glass was made magnetic.