Am I the only person who's shocked the GIF in the OP's post wasn't posted by @AngerDanger?
There's almost a poetic matter in which you've quoted a post discussing him in relation to you.Right, he's usually on top of it.
What are you talking about? PCI 4.0 is only barely coming out now, with the latest Ryzens.
There's almost a poetic matter in which you've quoted a post discussing him in relation to you.
Don't mind me. I've been drinking my good crafts before they turn.Hmmm, what?
Internal storage for the files that need super fast IO, 10 Gbit NAS for the rest.Where do I put my hard drives in that thing? Also, 6000 dollars starting price, fuuuck me.
Yeah PCIe 5 specc just finished, will take at leat 2 years to reach platforms.What are you talking about? PCI 4.0 is only barely coming out now, with the latest Ryzens.
PCIe 4 is coming out for Intel's server line beginning with Sapphire Rapids in 2022 or 2021. It'll be a while before either AMD or Intel adopt PCIe 5.99% this is PCIe 3 though, if that's the intel w3175x. And intel always waits a while before they add new features to their server and HEDT platforms
There you go, everyone's answer on PCIePCIe 4 is coming out for Intel's server line beginning with Sapphire Rapids in 2022 or 2021. It'll be a while before either AMD or Intel adopt PCIe 5.
TBH, AMD did themselves a massive favor. Though my curiosity was piqued. Was anyone saturating 100% bandwidth on PCIe3 on higher end boards? I don't read computer forums as much as I used to, but the aforementioned comes up from time to time when people discuss PCIe tech in relation to SATA.There you go, everyone's answer on PCIe
For GPUs it's not that necessary unless very specific workloads. For SSDs the jump is very welcome as all SSDs were maxing out their x4 link. though my guess is apple will just RAID a few together.TBH, AMD did themselves a massive favor. Though my curiosity was piqued. Was anyone saturating 100% bandwidth on PCIe3 on higher end boards? I don't read computer forums as much as I used to, but the aforementioned comes up from time to time when people discuss PCIe tech in relation to SATA.
In that case, I'll buy it over there and spend the difference on a nice european vacation.It's 40 pounds!
And $6,000 USD!!!
Not quite. SSDs were saturating the SATAIII bandwidth available. SSDs now connect through an NVME slot that take over 2-3 SATA ports and combine that bandwidth. PCIe SSDs bypass that altogether. It's why the Corsair PCIe4 SSD can outperform the fastest Samsung NVME. Ironically, some boards with NVME SSDs will shutdown PCIe lanes and not ports.For GPUs it's not that necessary unless very specific workloads. For SSDs the jump is very welcome as all SSDs were maxing out their x4 link. though my guess is apple will just RAID a few together.
(PCIe 4 SSDs need fans because they run so hot now)
My big concern is if it's PCI 3, PCI 5 is now out. It's basically 4x the speed of PCI3. I'd like to poo on apple about it, on the other hand, it's more intel not having a chipset to support the new standard.
So the dilemma is, do i wait a year and hope the new intel chipset and updated mac pro come out with PCI 5. Or, do I fear that intel doesnt update the chipset for a couple of years and by the time apple gets to updating it, it might be 3 years from now (or not ever). So do I just bite the bullet and get it now, or hold off for the much more modern PCI 5 standard?
TBH, AMD did themselves a massive favor. Though my curiosity was piqued. Was anyone saturating 100% bandwidth on PCIe3 on higher end boards? I don't read computer forums as much as I used to, but the aforementioned comes up from time to time when people discuss PCIe tech in relation to SATA.