So sorry but your argument is invalid. (see pic below)
not the mouse itself. ive lost a total of 104 $ on my overall purchases on these 2 mice. As far as youre concerned if I hadnt said i had bought an mx rev and just say some dude gave me 110 $ then you would be correct. (e.g. your assumption on how i had 75$ to begin with)
no doubt. However he fails at logic.
No offense. I apologize for my stupidity & ignorance in advance.
Like many others, I think OrangeCuse44 made much more sense in his calculation. Furthermore, if you don't clearly tell us the whole picture, how are you going to expect us to know about it in the first place, especially when you talk about us making assumptions about your money & so on.... Surely, we have to make some kind of assumptions without full information, haven't we?