Unfortunately, firearms have a perceived need. My firearms are always stored in a gun safe, under lock and key. Needless to say, this world would be a much better and safer place without them.
Good. Though I'm not sure that all gun owners are as disciplined as you are.
I had not fired nor held a handgun in some 15 years . . . Until, the well being of my wife and eldest daughter were threatened. The threat is now behind bars for the next 5 years. Now, one gun remains at my nightstand. Perhaps, in time, I will have the peace of mind to store that, as well.
It must have been a horrible experience, nice to know that it all ended well.
Not to start a huge argument, but tell me, if someone were to come into your house, with say a knife, and threaten your spouse's/child's life, would you want to have a gun in order to protect your loved one?
You say nothing good ever comes from owning a gun, how about being able to protect loved ones from those who wish to, in the most extreme case, kill them? Would you consider that "good?"
I don't want to start and argument that doesn't belong to this thread either . Although it is a very stimulating and controverted subject.
To answer your question, if someone were to come to my house, and threaten my family, I would rather not have a gun. I wouldn't know how to use it. The most common scenario would be a robbery. In such case, even if I had a gun and knew how to use it, I would never put my family at risk by pulling out a gun. I would rather try to give the robbers what they want and then call the police. Believe me, this would be the safest thing to do. Having a gun in this circumstance would lead to a situation in which one of the two would have to use it. Guns scare me not only because of what they are capable to do to the people who are shot, but also because of what they are capable to do to the people who are forced to use them. In the much less common case of life threatening scenarios, I still don't think that a gun would be useful. Most of the times negotiation is the key, violence only leads to more violence.
It is better to let people who are specifically trained to deal with dangerous situations, unlike most gun owners, carry guns (e.g. law enforcers). Not every one is capable of comporting himself with lucidity in situations in which they are forced to pull a gun from the holster.
I'm more worried that the poster referred to it as a "toy". Guns are not toys, ever.
The problem is not how you call it, but I agree they are not toys.