Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

ToddH

macrumors 68030
Jul 5, 2010
2,903
5,896
Central Tx
13 Pro max taken today.

3F60BDB0-EE37-47D8-9ECF-336FC0114589.jpeg
 

ValKor

macrumors newbie
Sep 26, 2021
18
79
So, I don’t have an iPhone 13 Pro but an iPhone 13 Mini, and I must say today I’m very disappointed about the pictures and videos taken last night that all show these weird reflexions of everything illuminated:
EC4F04BD-DF6F-4F57-96D3-620BA4703F92.jpeg


I previously had an iPhone 6, goes to Disneyland Paris Christmas Season every year and I never saw anything like that on any photo ou videos. Sometime there have been some lens flare but THAT ?
 

babyexercise

macrumors 65816
Oct 1, 2021
1,247
684
So, I don’t have an iPhone 13 Pro but an iPhone 13 Mini, and I must say today I’m very disappointed about the pictures and videos taken last night that all show these weird reflexions of everything illuminated:
View attachment 1919240

I previously had an iPhone 6, goes to Disneyland Paris Christmas Season every year and I never saw anything like that on any photo ou videos. Sometime there have been some lens flare but THAT ?

Yeah I just went to theme park and 13 pro has hard time with this kind of multiple light sources at night. I have iphone 11 too and it looks more normal.
 

PeterJP

macrumors 65816
Feb 2, 2012
1,136
896
Leuven, Belgium
Here's a comparison of the standard camera app (left) versus FirstLight (right).
Screenshot 2021-11-29 at 16.47.52.png

The sky was overcast most of the day with filtered light coming in from the left. The photos were taken immediately one after the other. I opened both on my mac, zoomed in to actual size and positioned them when I took this partial screenshot. FirstLight was used as default, without any film simulation on. Standard 26mm lens on both shots.

The left brow is OK with Apple, but the right one is a blur. Skin tone is not very pleasant for FirstLight, but actually more realistic than Apple's. I can see how Apple thinks this is going to appeal to more people, but I prefer a good base before applying effects. With FirstLight, I know base will be ok, then go for a Velvia/saturated/whatever look.

[EDIT] Just checked the metadata. Apple: 5,7mm/f1.5, 1/709s. FirstLight: 5,7mm/f1.4, 1/621s. So the shutter speed doesn't explain why the hair on the left side of the photo in Apple's shot seems to have motion unsharpness.
 

chriscl

macrumors 6502a
Jan 4, 2008
506
359
Stuttgart, Germany
So, I don’t have an iPhone 13 Pro but an iPhone 13 Mini, and I must say today I’m very disappointed about the pictures and videos taken last night that all show these weird reflexions of everything illuminated:
View attachment 1919240

I previously had an iPhone 6, goes to Disneyland Paris Christmas Season every year and I never saw anything like that on any photo ou videos. Sometime there have been some lens flare but THAT ?
Same here - see my earlier post in this thread. The camera is doing some weird stuff and generating strange lens flare, and I have not seen that from an iPhone camera before.

Hopefully it can be improved in software.
 

tedley

macrumors 6502
Nov 3, 2009
294
339
Sacramento
Same here - see my earlier post in this thread. The camera is doing some weird stuff and generating strange lens flare, and I have not seen that from an iPhone camera before.

Hopefully it can be improved in software.
Flare is caused by the exact construction and flaws of the lens and the precise angles of light passing through it for each image. Correcting it with software would require MORE processing, if it's even possible because each lens will be different with different micro flaws which contribute to flare. This has me really worried. It's a 'hardware' issue, unlike deep fusion and HDR 4 which could be turned off or toned down by the user if allowed by the gods at Apple.

A little lens flare can add character to an image but what I'm seeing in this thread is way beyond 'a little character'. It's making me rethink a 13 purchase. If my 8 dies, I just may look at finding a 12 pro.
 
  • Like
Reactions: arkitect

babyexercise

macrumors 65816
Oct 1, 2021
1,247
684
Here's a comparison of the standard camera app (left) versus FirstLight (right).
View attachment 1920070
The sky was overcast most of the day with filtered light coming in from the left. The photos were taken immediately one after the other. I opened both on my mac, zoomed in to actual size and positioned them when I took this partial screenshot. FirstLight was used as default, without any film simulation on. Standard 26mm lens on both shots.

The left brow is OK with Apple, but the right one is a blur. Skin tone is not very pleasant for FirstLight, but actually more realistic than Apple's. I can see how Apple thinks this is going to appeal to more people, but I prefer a good base before applying effects. With FirstLight, I know base will be ok, then go for a Velvia/saturated/whatever look.

[EDIT] Just checked the metadata. Apple: 5,7mm/f1.5, 1/709s. FirstLight: 5,7mm/f1.4, 1/621s. So the shutter speed doesn't explain why the hair on the left side of the photo in Apple's shot seems to have motion unsharpness.

I dont think Apple has opened enough functions in Xcode for other apps to be closed to Apple native photo app.
 

PeterJP

macrumors 65816
Feb 2, 2012
1,136
896
Leuven, Belgium
Looks like the pupil of his eye has had some processing done on it as well.
If you mean his iris (the blue part), yes, indeed. I hadn't even noticed that before.

I dont think Apple has opened enough functions in Xcode for other apps to be closed to Apple native photo app.
In which way do you mean this precisely?

I'll be continuing to do side-by-side tests. I'm going to a winter lights festival in a few weeks' time, which should be interesting, with all these reports of flare in such situations. I'll also start using the FirstLight filters to see if they retain detail while making the skin tone less awful.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dantracht

MisterTibbs

macrumors member
Mar 29, 2018
57
94
UK
If you mean his iris (the blue part), yes, indeed. I hadn't even noticed that before.


In which way do you mean this precisely?

I'll be continuing to do side-by-side tests. I'm going to a winter lights festival in a few weeks' time, which should be interesting, with all these reports of flare in such situations. I'll also start using the FirstLight filters to see if they retain detail while making the skin tone less awful.
I meant the pupil, it should be circular but it looks like the iris has been processed at the detriment of the pupil's roundness.
 

dantracht

Cancelled
Sep 19, 2013
1,422
7,946
Here's a comparison of the standard camera app (left) versus FirstLight (right).
View attachment 1920070
The sky was overcast most of the day with filtered light coming in from the left. The photos were taken immediately one after the other. I opened both on my mac, zoomed in to actual size and positioned them when I took this partial screenshot. FirstLight was used as default, without any film simulation on. Standard 26mm lens on both shots.

The left brow is OK with Apple, but the right one is a blur. Skin tone is not very pleasant for FirstLight, but actually more realistic than Apple's. I can see how Apple thinks this is going to appeal to more people, but I prefer a good base before applying effects. With FirstLight, I know base will be ok, then go for a Velvia/saturated/whatever look.

[EDIT] Just checked the metadata. Apple: 5,7mm/f1.5, 1/709s. FirstLight: 5,7mm/f1.4, 1/621s. So the shutter speed doesn't explain why the hair on the left side of the photo in Apple's shot seems to have motion unsharpness.
Forgive me, but what is firstlight?
 

Macuser81

macrumors newbie
Nov 30, 2021
1
3
The same discussion has been going on in Apple Communities too. I have a 13ProMax and facing a similar problem. Pictures look over processed, over smoothened, like an oil painting. Something is really very wrong here. I hope its a sw fix! Feedback - iPhone - Apple, send your feedback here and hopefully they will listen! I am not into technical stuff, but my 11ProMax took much better pics.
 

ToddH

macrumors 68030
Jul 5, 2010
2,903
5,896
Central Tx
LOL! I don’t see anything wrong here other than an uninteresting subject. Are you just pointing the camera and shooting the shot, or do you actually touch the screen to precise focus and make exposure adjustments? Most iPhone owners here aren’t trained photographers which results in badly executed shots. I’m beginning to think you guys are purposely looking for issues now. Your shot…jpeg or ProRAW? Edited or not?

My samples. ProRAW with Lightroom edits.

C5FDA57F-BE7F-4982-82AC-7C2BACB4213C.jpeg


95304A81-DDF3-47BB-917D-1DF7D5EB3F00.jpeg


DB42C1CB-169E-4CA8-9FF2-2CB0A70552C9.jpeg
 

darkheroz

macrumors regular
Jan 4, 2012
122
170
Bulgaria
LOL! I don’t see anything wrong here other than an uninteresting subject. Are you just pointing the camera and shooting the shot, or do you actually touch the screen to precise focus and make exposure adjustments? Most iPhone owners here aren’t trained photographers which results in badly executed shots. I’m beginning to think you guys are purposely looking for issues now. Your shot…jpeg or ProRAW? Edited or not?

My samples. ProRAW with Lightroom edits.

View attachment 1922307

View attachment 1922306

View attachment 1922308
Dear colleague, I use iPhone from iPhone 4 ! And use the camera everyday till than. Don't tell me how to shoot on iPhone! This camera system is with awful results ! For your info I have DLSR camera too and know how to use it. But iPhone camera is not the same ! Your photos also have such issues and as soon as u open your eyes will be good. 10x.
 

MacLappy

macrumors 6502a
Jul 28, 2011
530
394
Singapore
LOL! I don’t see anything wrong here other than an uninteresting subject. Are you just pointing the camera and shooting the shot, or do you actually touch the screen to precise focus and make exposure adjustments? Most iPhone owners here aren’t trained photographers which results in badly executed shots. I’m beginning to think you guys are purposely looking for issues now. Your shot…jpeg or ProRAW? Edited or not?

My samples. ProRAW with Lightroom edits.

View attachment 1922307

View attachment 1922306

View attachment 1922308

Nice Photos!

I am one of those “guys” with terrible photo taking skills. Just don’t have an eye for it. Most of the photos I take are really blend, with bad angles. Lol. Quite sad actually.

Still I am impressed with the iPhone 13 Pro Max, best phone camera I ever had.

Below is a picture I took of a scary looking bug.
Had my iPhone pressed up against the window, on hindsight should probably have given myself more distance from the subject, it’s legs were blurry in the shot probably because of the natural bokeh from being too close or it could have been moving. Either way just a bad shot. Lol.

Still, I doubt I would have been able to capture it on my iPhone 12. No idea what bug it is, was attached to the outside of my window. looks to be about 1.5 cm in length. Scary stuff.


7c6ab03693dfdc1177b10f89103c37d1.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: decafjava and ToddH

ToddH

macrumors 68030
Jul 5, 2010
2,903
5,896
Central Tx
Nice Photos!

I am one of those “guys” with terrible photo taking skills. Just don’t have an eye for it. Most of the photos I take are really blend, with bad angles. Lol. Quite sad actually.

Still I am impressed with the iPhone 13 Pro Max, best phone camera I ever had.

Below is a picture I took of a scary looking bug.
Had my iPhone pressed up against the window, on hindsight should probably have given myself more distance from the subject, it’s legs were blurry in the shot probably because of the natural bokeh from being too close or it could have been moving. Either way just a bad shot. Lol.

Still, I doubt I would have been able to capture it on my iPhone 12. No idea what bug it is, was attached to the outside of my window. looks to be about 1.5 cm in length. Scary stuff.


7c6ab03693dfdc1177b10f89103c37d1.jpg
Yeah I understand it not everybody has an eye for it that’s OK. I think that’s an assassin bug. I think it’s really cool having a macro mode on the iPhone like that to be able to take such cool shots up close. I bet you can go into the default editing app and raise the shadows up a little bit and see more of that bug‘s belly. If you’re interested in learning a little bit more about iPhone photography I think there’s some free stuff on the Internet like with iPhonephotographyschool.com and some other spots that would give you some tips and I’d be willing to help you myself if interested.
 

ToddH

macrumors 68030
Jul 5, 2010
2,903
5,896
Central Tx
Dear colleague, I use iPhone from iPhone 4 ! And use the camera everyday till than. Don't tell me how to shoot on iPhone! This camera system is with awful results ! For your info I have DLSR camera too and know how to use it. But iPhone camera is not the same ! Your photos also have such issues and as soon as u open your eyes will be good. 10x.
LOL…
 
  • Like
Reactions: decafjava

dantracht

Cancelled
Sep 19, 2013
1,422
7,946
Nice Photos!

I am one of those “guys” with terrible photo taking skills. Just don’t have an eye for it. Most of the photos I take are really blend, with bad angles. Lol. Quite sad actually.

Still I am impressed with the iPhone 13 Pro Max, best phone camera I ever had.

Below is a picture I took of a scary looking bug.
Had my iPhone pressed up against the window, on hindsight should probably have given myself more distance from the subject, it’s legs were blurry in the shot probably because of the natural bokeh from being too close or it could have been moving. Either way just a bad shot. Lol.

Still, I doubt I would have been able to capture it on my iPhone 12. No idea what bug it is, was attached to the outside of my window. looks to be about 1.5 cm in length. Scary stuff.


7c6ab03693dfdc1177b10f89103c37d1.jpg
What the hell bug is that? Yikes!
 

Bobout

macrumors 65816
Apr 6, 2017
1,415
2,481
Apple Valley
LOL! I don’t see anything wrong here other than an uninteresting subject. Are you just pointing the camera and shooting the shot, or do you actually touch the screen to precise focus and make exposure adjustments? Most iPhone owners here aren’t trained photographers which results in badly executed shots. I’m beginning to think you guys are purposely looking for issues now. Your shot…jpeg or ProRAW? Edited or not?

My samples. ProRAW with Lightroom edits.
I’m one of those point and shoot type of guys and my photos to me come out fine still but maybe I don’t have an eye what’s good or bad here are a couple of examples .. one was a live pic that i just did a long exposure and hit the magic wand in the native software
C80B33D9-D552-40BF-A564-F60AEDD82528.jpeg

99DA9CA7-622D-47F7-A774-E042A055C7A4.jpeg
 

Fred Zed

macrumors 603
Aug 15, 2019
5,886
6,561
Upstate NY . Was FL.
Yeah I understand it not everybody has an eye for it that’s OK. I think that’s an assassin bug. I think it’s really cool having a macro mode on the iPhone like that to be able to take such cool shots up close. I bet you can go into the default editing app and raise the shadows up a little bit and see more of that bug‘s belly. If you’re interested in learning a little bit more about iPhone photography I think there’s some free stuff on the Internet like with iPhonephotographyschool.com and some other spots that would give you some tips and I’d be willing to help you myself if interested.
Yeah. Looks like they made the iPhone 13 pro camera system too good. Which results in poorer results for us amateurs 😂
PS some great shots there buddy. 👍🏼
 
  • Like
Reactions: ToddH and Bobout

ToddH

macrumors 68030
Jul 5, 2010
2,903
5,896
Central Tx
I’m one of those point and shoot type of guys and my photos to me come out fine still but maybe I don’t have an eye what’s good or bad here are a couple of examples .. one was a live pic that i just did a long exposure and hit the magic wand in the native software
View attachment 1922500
View attachment 1922501
Wow, I really like the detailing that Ferris wheel. That’s cool.

I’ve been a photographer for a long time and I know a lot about sensors and megapixels etc. I think some of the issues that y’all are talking about could be contributed to the fact that the new larger sensor in the iPhone 13 Pro Max has 1.9 µm diameter pixels. With pixels that large and spread out over a 12 mega pixel sensor, they pick up a lot of light but are sometimes too large to really bring in a lot of resolution and detail. If this were a 24 megapixel sensor with 1.7 µm diameter pixels, things would look a lot sharper and cleaner. On the professional level, I had a Nikon D3 which was a 12 megapixel camera and the pixels were pretty large for a full frame sensor, nearly 8 µm in diameter which is pretty big. Great for low light but not so good for distant detail and high resolution. Using a 50 mm lens I remember taking a photo of a tree and the leaves looked blotchy instead of like leaves just because it just didn’t have the resolution in detail and I think that’s kind of what we’re seeing with the iPhone wide camera. That’s the largest iPhone sensor ever and big pixels.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.