Well, I guess you could say Samsung are innovators after all. Sure, their innovations are mostly in copying, but hey, an innovation is an innovation. I wonder how many others will follow suit and start copying the copying now.
Your "problem" ?
Why is this a problem for you. Were you going to buy a gold S4 and now won't because of how it looks?
Well, I guess you could say Samsung are innovators after all. Sure, their innovations are mostly in copying, but hey, an innovation is an innovation. I wonder how many others will follow suit and start copying the copying now.
Who said having a gold phone was innovative?
Samsung added 2 colors to the s3 mid cycle also last year.this is not something new with Samsung .its a mid cycle face lift.
Last year they added red and brown to the gs3
Now they added pink and gold vs red and brown
But was it added to the roadmap when rumors of a gold iPhone began a few months ago?
Have no clue what this is even supposed to mean, but okay.
It's not...
It's the COPYING that is innovative.
I'm going to say that the 5Cs were always in the pipeline. Apple has been playing with color since the late 90's. And products like the MacBooks and iPods have gone through changes in the way they are coated.
The first iPhone has this problem where the aluminum coating starts to come off and leave all these spots everywhere. The white iPhone had the light leak issues right around the time it was announced.
I'm pretty sure that the 5C was going to be like the iPod Touch 5th generation, but then they had issues with the cellular and GPS chips, and that's why they ended up going the plastic route.
Nokia is just eating up the free advertising. I would say the Moto X is the one copying their style.
I'm going to say that the 5Cs were always in the pipeline. Apple has been playing with color since the late 90's. And products like the MacBooks and iPods have gone through changes in the way they are coated.
The first iPhone has this problem where the aluminum coating starts to come off and leave all these spots everywhere. The white iPhone had the light leak issues right around the time it was announced.
I'm pretty sure that the 5C was going to be like the iPod Touch 5th generation, but then they had issues with the cellular and GPS chips, and that's why they ended up going the plastic route.
Nokia is just eating up the free advertising. I would say the Moto X is the one copying their style.
So Apple IS innovative as well then. Got it.
Nokia is just eating up the free advertising. I would say the Moto X is the one copying their style.
Well, not particularly... they just copy. Samsung appear to be the true innovators of copying. They've built a nice little foundation over there doing it.
The only reason we always say Apple works behind closed doors is because we KNOW they do, and all that evidence was brought up in the Samsung lawsuits earlier this year.
They are NOT the company who bring out a product overnight. How many different Lumia devices are out now? How many new products did Samsung release yesterday?
And you know, Nokia boasted about color, yes, but their two best selling handsets in the US are the low ends you can only get in white or black. You have to get the on-contract models to get the ones in cyan, red, yellow, etc. The 1020 costs $100 more on-contract and only comes in black, white, and yellow too.
So basically Apple does no wrong and invented everything long before anyone else even if another company comes out with it first it was Apple that REALLY came out with it but didn't because they were working with it behind closed doors?
Or, Apple no matter what does everything before everyone even if there's proof to the contrary? Or even if an entirely different and separate industry does something long before Apple was even in the public eye it was still Apple that did it first because they were going to eventually do it in the future?
That's really what your post says to me.
Do you have any understanding how much work goes into getting a phone to market? Clearly not.
Look, I'm having a little fun here with all this so if I offend anyone, or ruffle anyone's feathers, I apologize. But as far as the copying goes, I agree that everyone does it. Even Apple. but the thing that irks me, and probably most of the people you would label as fanboys or haters, is the fashion in which Samsung does it, at least the appearance of the way they do it. The way I see it is almost as if they have a team waiting on standby to see what apple does, then shamelessly put out a quick copy of it. Barely putting their own "twist" to it. Items like their S-Voice, the mini stores in Best Buy, the microphone in their voice recorder app, the "tickets" in their "Samsung Wallet" app that look like Passbook, their early product packaging. And look at patent D686,201 just issued... (http://www.patentbolt.com/2013/07/s...te-controller-and-two-controversial-wins.html) it looks like a mac mini. Theres even a Laptop i've seen of theirs that looks just like a Macbook, right down to the keys.
it's one thing to copy a feature or two, one or two aspects of a design... That doesn't bother me. Apple Does it, MS does it, Google does it, Nokia etc. but it just seems to me that Samsung just copies everything and anything that works for Apple (or any other company). That's what I think irks most non-Samsung fans and why you don't see nearly as much of the b**ching and moaning about the other companies when they copy something.
To be fair... How much work do you think would go into adding a different color dye into an existing process? It's not a new phone, not a new template, not a new cast, no new software to write and test... Just a new color. How difficult would it be for Apple now to add a "Gold" back to the already in production 5c?
.....