LOL. Wake me up, if you have real arguments! Thank you.
Wake me up if you have something meaningful to say?
LOL. Wake me up, if you have real arguments! Thank you.
zbarvian,
Have you used the latest touchwiz? It's... really good. And I don't even use a Galaxy device as a daily driver.
Honestly, its look alone is enough to repel me. It's really ugly.
zbarvian,
Have you used the latest touchwiz? It's... really good. And I don't even use a Galaxy device as a daily driver.
I'm hoping Samsung makes 6" screens the new normal.
Galaxy s: 4.2" => 4.8" => 5"
Note: 5.3" => 5.5" => 6"
It does seem like Samsung do listen to what consumers want/ask for and react accordingly.
GPU is faster as well. It a little more than just a clock speed advantage. Its over twice as fast in v8, gets sub 600ms sunspider, and is a true cortex a15.
Dont understand the obssesion with sunspider test on these forum....
Dont understand the obssesion with sunspider test on these forum....
What the heck are you talking about mate?
Honestly, its look alone is enough to repel me. It's really ugly. If I switch to Android, I will definitely be going stock. I don't think TouchWiz has anything on Android 4.2.
Its a browser speed test. You know what people usually use the most on their phone's these days? You guessed it, the browser!
Very political answer. You're doing good.
----------
The funny thing is that TouchWiz in the originally Galaxy S had many resemblances to iOS. Yet according to you TouchWiz looks ugly but iOS is some sort of breakthrough in UI design.
----------
That smiley won't hide your bias.
TouchWiz on the Galaxy S was a poor man's iOS. It resembled iOS, but just looked way worse. And iOS isn't a "design breakthrough," it's just good design. Windows Phone 8 is also good design.
Don't hear me say the ALL of iOS is good design, as it certainly isn't. Hopefully you won't distort my argument anymore now.
OK. Give me your honest opinion. Are you saying that all of the documents in which Apple showed that the Galaxy S's software looked really similar to iOS' were blatant manipulations created solely to deceive others (eg. the jury in the lawsuit)?
Think about it carefully.
What? Reword that, I'm not entirely sure I understand what you're asking.
I'm sure you are aware that leading up to, and during, the lawsuit, Apple used many documents showcasing how the software in the Galaxy S was similar to the one in iOS.
This is a picture I'm sure you have seen many times:
Image
This was an internal document from Samsung that Apple once again used to show that TouchWiz was very similar to iOS:
http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/08/apple-samsung-internal-document-mimicry/
You are saying that they do not look the same. You went as far as to call the messaging application in TouchWiz as fisher-price design. So are you disagreeing with Apple in that TouchWiz from the Galaxy S is indeed different from iOS? I'm just asking for your personal opinion.
I think it was definitely modeled after iOS. Just because it doesn't have the same polish and finesse as iOS doesn't absolve Samsung. Design is more than visual design.
Are you saying that their visual design is similar?
Visually, not exactly. Design-wise, yes.
So correct me if I'm wrong, but this would imply that the iOS messaging application is also fisher-price like.
No...
QED. Don't need to say who won that.
Z, in a discussion we had, you also said you wished the UI animations were as good as iOS, but then knock Android's animations for copying iOS'.
Similar argument happening here. Similar tactics.
Sure buddy. With each new post you contradict one of your earlier ones, so let's just drop this argument.