Where PC hardware wins is in thin ultraportables with optical drives.
If it doesn't have an optical drive, you can just buy one of Apple's netbooks.
Apples netbooks? What netbooks they don't sell netbooks
Yes, they sell expensive netbooks, the MBA.
To be accurate, even in this case the PC hardware is better, as they don't have gigabit Ethernet, which is essential.
I agree fully and know exactly what you mean... I want the possibility to spend much more and get the MBA of my dreams.
and on SB/IB 16GB
...
I mean why doesn't Apple truly capitalize on us nutjobs who will blow our wads on these MBAs. I would add it all, as this is my addiction.
Where PC hardware wins is in thin ultraportables with optical drives.
If it doesn't have an optical drive, you can just buy one of Apple's netbooks.
Yes, they sell expensive netbooks, the MBA.
To be accurate, even in this case the PC hardware is better, as they don't have gigabit Ethernet, which is essential.
In what way would Apple's bottom line be reduced if they sold 'luxury' MBAs ($3k to $4k) to those who want to spend their excess money on advanced machines?
Where is capitalism when you need it?!
I have yet to see a laptop that matches MBA's form factor and specs with an optical drive. ODDs take a ridiculous amount of space and are more or less useless.
No. MBA is an ultraportable, not a netbook. Netbook is something extremely cheap and limited and usually not even light or small (besides the small screen).
What is the point of an ultraportable if you have to keep it plugged in?
Hellhammer -- I admire your patience but my advice would be: Don't feed the trolls.I have yet to see a laptop that matches MBA's form factor and specs with an optical drive. ODDs take a ridiculous amount of space and are more or less useless.
No. MBA is an ultraportable, not a netbook. Netbook is something extremely cheap and limited and usually not even light or small (besides the small screen).
What is the point of an ultraportable if you have to keep it plugged in?
I agree that the MBA's esthetics are remarkable and also that there is nothing in the same world among Windows laptops. I run Windows 7 in emulation on my MBA because I must. Windows 7 is extremely flexible and probably gives very, very savvy users greater ability to customize it than does OS X. But, as you noted, OS X integrates seamlessly with Apple's hardware and is exponentially less frustrating to use than Windows 7.As a related example, I just set up a Sony Vaio X1 for a junior faculty of mine. While it is incredibly light and thin, the entire Windows 7 experience on this computer is entirely different than a MBA. I forgot how frustrating the whole experience of computing can be.
It's not the specs--it's the entire experience of computing for what you do most. Software and hardware integration.
I cannot see Sony or Samsung competing on the basis of user experience, as much as they may try. The only thing left is specs, which is so last decade.
And would you care to find it written in a book of Law that you cannot run OS X in a virtual Machine? Just because it goes against Apples Policy.
Problems: It only has the screen resolution of the 11", it runs Windows only, and the cheapest model costs more than the most expensive MBA 13".
So it won't take any MacOS X customers away from Apple. Question is how many they will sell to Windows users; good luck to them. Dell's Adamo (headline: Dell Adamo is a super slim laptop all set to blow away the AIR) isn't for sale anymore, due to overwhelming success in sales
I still love MBA!
i have yet to see a laptop that matches mba's form factor and specs with an optical drive. Odds take a ridiculous amount of space and are more or less useless.
No. Mba is an ultraportable, not a netbook. Netbook is something extremely cheap and limited and usually not even light or small (besides the small screen).
What is the point of an ultraportable if you have to keep it plugged in?
There are ultraportables with very thin optical drives.
Any laptop that does not have an optical drive is a netbook.
Netbooks are small portable computing device, similar to a notebook, and are great for surfing the Web and checking e-mail. What differentiates a netbook from a notebook is its physical size and computing power. A netbook typically has a small display, ranging from 7 to 10 inches.
A small laptop that has a screen size of less than 10” diagonally.
These are essentially scaled down notebooks with smaller screen sizes, most commonly in 9 and 10 inches and based on x86 CPUs, such as Intel's Atom family.
If in addition, it doesn't have ethernet, it is an uber-netbook.
Why would you have to keep an ultraportable plugged in if it has an ethernet port?
Links, please.
According to what? Netbook is a laptop with ≤10" screen.
Why should it have an Ethernet port if nobody uses it? I fail to see how you can use the Ethernet port without plugging a cable into it. I have yet to see wireless Gigabit Ethernet.
Links, please.
Toshiba Portege, for example.
I don't care about those arbitrary definitions. A netbook is a crippled, not full-functional laptop. No optical drive == not full functional. No ethernet == crippled.
You said that "if it had an ethernet port, you would have to leave it plugged in". You can use gigabit ethernet when you need it and still not plug it all the time.
Toshiba Portege, for example.
I don't care about those arbitrary definitions. A netbook is a crippled, not full-functional laptop. No optical drive == not full functional. No ethernet == crippled.
According to what? Netbook is a laptop with ≤10" screen.