Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Should I buy a 16gb or 8gb version?

  • Buy 16gb

    Votes: 50 27.9%
  • Buy 8gb and save for the next tempting upgrade

    Votes: 129 72.1%

  • Total voters
    179

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,921
13,272
I honestly wouldn’t count on it. They are manufacturing one SoC for 5 product lines at this point - and remember, the RAM on M1 is built into the SoC. So I don’t think you can read this much into the decision to put 16GB on the top end iPad Pro. In my opinion it could easily come down to supply chain quirks and “why not?” decision making.

In other words, if they weren’t *already* mass manufacturing 16GB M1 SoCs, would Apple have engineered 16GB option into iPad Pro? Probably not.

They could've just as easily used M1+8GB across the board and not made any mention of how much RAM is installed. That was their modus operandi on all iPads that have been released before.
 

Digitalguy

macrumors 601
Apr 15, 2019
4,656
4,493
They could've just as easily used M1+8GB across the board and not made any mention of how much RAM is installed. That was their modus operandi on all iPads that have been released before.
Exactly that's not a "why not" thing. It's either something big will be coming, capable of using that much RAM, or just to incentivize more expensive SKUs. Or probably both, the second in the short term and the first in the longer term....
 
  • Like
Reactions: rui no onna

iamMacPerson

macrumors 68040
Jun 12, 2011
3,488
1,927
AZ/10.0.1.1
This could easily just come down to “why should we spend R&D to develop a new A14x architecture when we could just use M1?”. It saves development money and manufacturing money.
Not only did it save money but it also allows them to make the claim that the iPad has a desktop-class SoC. And even if they don't actively market that - which would be stupid not to - enough people would look and see that it has the same chip as the Macs and might entice them more considering all the hype the M1 has received.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Wackery and VaruLV

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,921
13,272
Exactly that's not a "why not" thing. It's either something big will be coming, capable of using that much RAM, or just to incentivize more expensive SKUs. Or probably both, the second in the short term and the first in the longer term....

Yep. Plus M1+8GB is the standard config. M1+16GB is BTO only on Macs.


Not only did it save money but it also allows them to make the claim that the iPad has a desktop-class SoC. And even if they don't actively market that - which would be stupid not to - enough people would look and see that it has the same chip as the Macs and might entice them more considering all the hype the M1 has received.

They've been claiming desktop class since the A7 (which, in fairness, was around high end Atom).

Manufacturing cost, yes, quite likely. R&D? Not really. M1 is essentially based on A14. M1 : A14 is pretty much what A12X/Z : A12 was. Just natural progression. I think there was actually a bigger jump going from A10X to A12X/Z than there was from A12X/Z to M1.

I was expecting the A14X/Z to simply be the M1 with certain features disabled. I actually find it interesting that the "reject" chips with 8C/7C are going on the iMacs and MacBook Airs.

BA7C9333-BF3E-4074-B567-095CB05C3F35.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Digitalguy

Harmonious Zen

macrumors 6502a
May 18, 2013
874
551
They could've just as easily used M1+8GB across the board and not made any mention of how much RAM is installed. That was their modus operandi on all iPads that have been released before.

Exactly. And this is Apple we're talking about. There's absolutely no reason they couldn't have reconfigured the M1 with, say, 6GB instead. There is absolutely a reason they're specifically highlighting the RAM on the iPad Pros. And there's a reason the price is way higher than it was before.
 

VaruLV

macrumors 6502a
Mar 25, 2019
636
561
If it allows hassle free multi tasking just like on normal Win/mOS computer, then almost.
Good and powerful laptop plus good tablet wont be much cheaper together either. If you factor in MK/latest Brydge kb and pencil, then iPP cost goes even higher, but, again, if you want one powerful device with iOS apps and touch screen AND Apple allows for “normal” multi tasking and adds full external extended etc display support, then you might get yourself very versatile and powerful “AIO” device.
But I wouldnt be surprised if Apple simply allows dev’s to make more powerful, macOS’ish app versions for M1 iPP with little “R&D” involvement themselves and it then takes Apple forever to add all those computer features so many of us would want having.
 

torxcrossword

macrumors member
Dec 18, 2013
32
10
Has there been a Youtube video testing 4GB RAM vs 6GB RAM (existing 11" iPad Pros) and whether or not the extra 2GB of RAM results in apps being pushed out of RAM less often? If 16GB makes multitasking much more smooth due to fewer swap outs, it may be a selling point for me.
 

Wackery

Cancelled
Feb 1, 2015
1,342
1,571
Has there been a Youtube video testing 4GB RAM vs 6GB RAM (existing 11" iPad Pros) and whether or not the extra 2GB of RAM results in apps being pushed out of RAM less often? If 16GB makes multitasking much more smooth due to fewer swap outs, it may be a selling point for me.
I’m slightly skeptical, more ram might be for processing the extra pixels of the mini-LED and might not have much visible benefit
 

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,921
13,272
Has there been a Youtube video testing 4GB RAM vs 6GB RAM (existing 11" iPad Pros) and whether or not the extra 2GB of RAM results in apps being pushed out of RAM less often? If 16GB makes multitasking much more smooth due to fewer swap outs, it may be a selling point for me.

At 15:52.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Mt44 and max2

throAU

macrumors G3
Feb 13, 2012
9,241
7,406
Perth, Western Australia
What do you advice? What will you buy and why?
what is your use case?

if it is say, facebook, facetime, imessage and sketching things/notetaking, and games then.... no?

If it's high end content creation/video edting, etc. and the capacity will generate you revenue faster then... sure?


edit:
"and games". if you're gaming on an ipad by the time ipad games need 16 GB of RAM we'll be in 2030 and the base model 2030 ipad will likely have GPU performance around 100-1000 times what your 2021 ipad pro will have. If you think i'm joking, the M1 GPU is 1500x the original ipad performance, 11 years on.


It isn't worth over-speccing on memory you don't need now in the hope your ipad will remain relevant - for gaming.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: obargy
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.