Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Hi was suspended for lying regarding Browservice plus he was very unfriendly to me when I tried to reach out to him for assistance in how to get Browservice going. I managed to get Browservice to work and now OS 9 allows me to view any website.. but he also lied about a few things.
Well, besides he was a bit overconfident about his Apple hardware never to fail, all his postings I happened to read were quite decent, taking into account, that there was really a kind of a ***storm towards his postings.
And there is a subtle difference between telling someone he's wrong compared to accusing him to be a lyar.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Project Alice
I'm assuming I'm not the only one (didn't read all of the replies on this thread) but even though these look cool, I probably won't buy a new Mac because I just don't think I'm the target audience. I like to be able to run older software and they already ruined that with Catalina. I feel like if I'd buy this, it would just be a very expensive web browsing machine (which my iPad already is)

Even though that new iMac is super fast, I'm probably able to do much more on my late 2006 iMac for my use cases. Which sounds weird, I know. It's all too locked down. I didn't like how much SIP broke in El Capitan (yes, it's 'safer' or whatever)

Maybe if I would be a pro user of stuff like the latest Adobe stuff or Final Cut I'd buy the new iMac, but I think those people aren't even the target audience.

I just realised most people would just use it as an internet machine anyways. Hmmm.
 
I'm assuming I'm not the only one (didn't read all of the replies on this thread) but even though these look cool, I probably won't buy a new Mac because I just don't think I'm the target audience. I like to be able to run older software and they already ruined that with Catalina. I feel like if I'd buy this, it would just be a very expensive web browsing machine (which my iPad already is)

Even though that new iMac is super fast, I'm probably able to do much more on my late 2006 iMac for my use cases. Which sounds weird, I know. It's all too locked down. I didn't like how much SIP broke in El Capitan (yes, it's 'safer' or whatever)

Maybe if I would be a pro user of stuff like the latest Adobe stuff or Final Cut I'd buy the new iMac, but I think those people aren't even the target audience.

I just realised most people would just use it as an internet machine anyways. Hmmm.
If you need a new machine because the old one is too slow, or unreliable, for your use-case, you're probably better off buying a 2020 iMac (i.e. an Intel model), and using a VM for anything that isn't supported in Big Sur.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1
If you need a new machine because the old one is too slow, or unreliable, for your use-case, you're probably better off buying a 2020 iMac (i.e. an Intel model), and using a VM for anything that isn't supported in Big Sur.
I think buying an iMac from around 5 years ago will be much better value for money + you could natively run Mojave. Macs tend to drop in price rapidly around here (my parents bought a second hand 24-inch 2009 iMac when it was just a couple of years old for €350. It was even upgraded to a fusion drive)
It will start to be a problem probably in the future (I'm talking 15-20 years) when the last Intel Macs become obsolete.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Amethyst1
I think buying an iMac from around 5 years ago will be much better value for money + you could natively run Mojave. Macs tend to drop in price rapidly around here (my parents bought a second hand 24-inch 2009 iMac when it was just a couple of years old for €350. It was even upgraded to a fusion drive)
It will start to be a problem probably in the future (I'm talking 15-20 years) when the last Intel Macs become obsolete.
It’ll certainly be cheaper, sure

but 5 years means any hardware faults are at cost to you, and it’s rapidly approaching EOL for parts.
 
Looking at the title of this thread, it’s within the PowerPC topic general forum. Shouldn’t the OP be posting this in the Mactel forums ? This has nothing to do with PPC, though I’d recommend a G4 MDD or G5 quad for what he uses his Mac for ?
 
I know I'm late to this, but I find the discussion about "never" failing a bit amusing.

A couple of anecdotes and comments:

1. Back in 1995 or so, my grandfather spent about 6 weeks in the hospital, and in that time he agreed to having an implantable defibrillator installed. At the time, it was decently major surgery. My mind is a bit vague on details, but I seem to recall that they installed and tested it in the OR, and it worked fine. A couple of days later, a situation came up where it should have but didn't. Fortunately he was still at the hospital and they could take care of things, but they did some further diagnostics and found that it had basically quit working. This was a(then) top notch cardiac hospital that had been installing the things pretty much as long as they'd been on the market-the failure was the first of its type that they'd seen. A few days later, he had a replacement. This wasn't a computer, but a 5-figure implantable medical device where the stakes are incredibly high if it fails.

2. I have a big pile of NOS 500gb PATA drives for the Xserve G5. Despite them being NOS, if you power one up and look at it in SMART utility, you'll see a couple hundred hours of operation. This is common on pretty much any enterprise grade drive you buy. You'll see something referenced called the "bathtub curve" of failures on electronics components, which basically means that failures are high when something is first put into operation, fall off with increased operation, and then increase toward end of design life. Enterprise drives-and a lot of other enterprise class hardware-gets a few hundred hours of operation to hopefully catch failures in the head end of that. Most consumer hardware gets a basic power on/operation test and goes out the door.

3. Some things have design flaws that will appear eventually if the item is used. Apple can worsen things because default they tend to prefer bumping up against temperature design limits while keeping the computer quiet vs. aggressive cooling that's noisy. Even at that, liquid cooled PPC G5s will probably leak eventually, or can be headed off iff they're serviced, although I've been lucky personally. nVidia shipped bad GPUs for the MBP 3,1/4,1-they later released a revised one that fixed the issue, but the original version will inevitably fail. Fortunately it can be fixed. The same thing happened with the Radeon GPUs in the 2011 15" and 17" MBPs, although there is no repaired GPU for them-the only fix if you want to keep using one is to disable the discreet GPU completely.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.