'as of late'; when would that be? for me, the OS has been either consistent, or presently on the sonoma beta... faster.🤔Good, because Mac OS has become really slow as of late.
'as of late'; when would that be? for me, the OS has been either consistent, or presently on the sonoma beta... faster.🤔Good, because Mac OS has become really slow as of late.
In that case you would never be able to improve the app at all, or have it do evaluations of any new hardware features that might show up.if an app that measures core values reads them differently with different versions... how is that usable information? why should a point update give me different results? the tools should get better, but the results should be consistent.
i get it... sort-of. but it feels a bit like saying 'this new watch can make tasks happen faster, as the clock itself moves slower. try it and see how fast your mac starts up!'In that case you would never be able to improve the app at all, or have it do evaluations of any new hardware features that might show up.
Stage manager has seen some annoyances fixed as far as I can see.
Like what? My issue with Stage Manager was the fact it only showed five tabbed apps at a time and if you had more apps than that opened then Stage Manager was an annoyance.
Can attest that at least Safari has been optimized..
Ventura 13.4, cold booted, Safari, running Speedometer 2.0 - avg. score after 10 runs= 142
Sonoma 14.0 beta 1, cold booted, Safari, running Speedometer 2.0 - avg. score after 10 runs = 190
this on a base 2018 rMBP with 8 GB RAM..
Is that good or bad?Yikes!
Sonoma 14.0 beta 2, cold booted, Safari 17.0, running Speedometer 2.0 - avg. score after 10 runs = 159
This was a delta update..
Sorry, I don't understand still — is 190 faster than 159? Or is 159 faster than 190?It's a sizeable drop from 190 in beta 1
Speedometer 2.1
browserbench.org
macOS 12.6.7 with a recent Technology Preview
Can someone try the 2.1 version and post results?
Sorry, I don't understand still — is 190 faster than 159? Or is 159 faster than 190?
Dev Beta 2, MacBook Pro M1 Pro 14'' 32gb RamSpeedometer 2.1
browserbench.org
macOS 12.6.7 with a recent Technology Preview
Can someone try the 2.1 version and post results?
Sonoma beta 2, MacBook Air M2 16GB/512GB, 10 GPUs.Speedometer 2.1
browserbench.org
macOS 12.6.7 with a recent Technology Preview
Can someone try the 2.1 version and post results?
Yikes!
Sonoma 14.0 beta 2, cold booted, Safari 17.0, running Speedometer 2.0 - avg. score after 10 runs = 159
This was a delta update..
doesn't seem tangibly slower here. are u on an intel or silicon mac?🤔... beta 1 was too good... 🤔... they slowed down everything in beta 2....🤔......
sure; sonoma will be out around september. the variable is... ventura is a released & updated OS, sonoma is early in it's pre-release cycle. consider updating only if you're ok with that.I'm still on Monterey with my intel iMac. Been waiting for Ventura 13.5 but maybe I should skip it altogether?
You guys got me so excited, this is first ever mention of "performance increase" for any macOS released!sure; sonoma will be out around september. the variable is... ventura is a released & updated OS, sonoma is early in it's pre-release cycle. consider updating only if you're ok with that.