Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

kagharaht

macrumors 68000
Oct 7, 2007
1,707
1,400
Thats interesting. I just did one now before the update. Then I'll do the update and see if it's faster or slower. From people post here it seems faster after the update.
 

WalsallSaddler

macrumors newbie
Dec 2, 2022
29
19
That’s great about this benchmark, but what about real world perfomance?

Benchmarks doesn’t matter, how about speed and smoothness of UI in the system overall, scrolling and animations?

I saw some messages from other topics, that Sonoma more laggy in terms of smoothness.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AAPLGeek

kagharaht

macrumors 68000
Oct 7, 2007
1,707
1,400
Before update iMac M3, 24gb, 8/10. - 660
After update - 675
Not a big improvement on my end.
 

fisherking

macrumors G4
Jul 16, 2010
11,252
5,563
ny somewhere
Before update iMac M3, 24gb, 8/10. - 660
After update - 675
Not a big improvement on my end.
an OS update is no substitution for a processor update, it can't perform magic (and you're already on an M3 👍)

OS updates may bring marginal speed increases, but mostly should be about bug fixes, leaner code, better functionality, new options.
 

kagharaht

macrumors 68000
Oct 7, 2007
1,707
1,400
an OS update is no substitution for a processor update, it can't perform magic (and you're already on an M3 👍)

OS updates may bring marginal speed increases, but mostly should be about bug fixes, leaner code, better functionality, new options.
Oh yeah no complaints here. 😀 It was already freaking fast coming from an iMac Late 2013. I ran this test on Firefox latest update and its 550 mark with that browser.
 
  • Like
Reactions: fisherking

Leslie D.

macrumors newbie
Sep 25, 2023
6
5
Oh yeah no complaints here. 😀 It was already freaking fast coming from an iMac Late 2013. I ran this test on Firefox latest update and its 550 mark with that browser.
Firefox is "of course" always slower than the latest Safari version in this benchmark, and usually slower than Chrome.
 

kagharaht

macrumors 68000
Oct 7, 2007
1,707
1,400
Most of the time the second test run will be a higher score, you should be getting at least 680 on the M3 chips. I just got over 690 just now
Got 677 way below 690 which is great you get that mark on yours. Nice.
 

David1986H

macrumors 6502
May 12, 2020
493
375
Cheshire, UK
Since the release date of the M1, M2 and M3 chips, here's what the speedometer 2.1 scores started at and what they are now... Running on Sonoma 14.4

M1 started at 220 and now at 500
M2 started at 520 and now at 590
M3 started at 600 and now at 700 (In just 4 months)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leslie D.

David1986H

macrumors 6502
May 12, 2020
493
375
Cheshire, UK
The latest Speedometer 3.0 on M3 Max running 14.4 and Safari 17.4

Its going to take time to get use to these double digit scores ..

Screenshot 2024-03-13 at 20.37.26.png
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Leslie D.

David1986H

macrumors 6502
May 12, 2020
493
375
Cheshire, UK
Anyone else noticed speedometer 2.1 is producing lower scores over the last day or two?

I was getting between 690 and 700 every time on the M3 Max, now it's around 665. Maybe it has to do with the release of speedometer 3.0
 

David1986H

macrumors 6502
May 12, 2020
493
375
Cheshire, UK
Anyone using 14.5 Beta 1? Curious to see if Sonoma got any faster on a speedometer 3.0 run, without any content blockers. My M3 Max gets around 37.5 - 38.2

Tip: the second run is usually faster.
 

CC88

macrumors 6502
Sep 29, 2010
488
117
Hi!

Thinking of updating from Ventura to Sonoma. How much is optimized for Arm Mac than Ventura? Will I notice a speed bumb or not?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.