The "power on hours" can't be correct. This Mac is running almost the whole day since six months.M4 Pro Mini, first used in January.
View attachment 2518136
Last edited:
The "power on hours" can't be correct. This Mac is running almost the whole day since six months.M4 Pro Mini, first used in January.
View attachment 2518136
Click on the attribute name for more information:The "power on hours" can't be correct. This Mac is running almost the whole day since six months.
#12 Power On Hours
Contains the number of power-on hours of the SSD. This may not include a time that SSD controller was powered and in a Non-Operational Power State (NOPS).
"Power On Hours" parameter in NVMe SSDs only reports the actual working time of the SSD, the time spent on 1/0 operations, etc., and (on most NVMe SSD models) does not include standby time (when the SSD controller is in a sleep state). In such a case, the "Power On Hours" raw value could be relatively small (and much less than computer power-on time) as modern NVMe SSDs are very energy effective and extremely fast.
Important note: do not confuse with the number of power-on hours of the computer, these numbers are completely unrelated.
I don’t know if I could use a computer without Spotlight!Some people like me have disabled spotlight. Will you enable it for macos 26?
Why? How do you find anything?Some people like me have disabled spotlight.
Why? How do you find anything?
The improvements to Spotlight are actually some of the most interesting and useful functionality in the new OS, IMO.
I'd guess that if you had 1TB drive, there would be 8% loss now?An update on my 16' MBP... Now 98% life percentage left!!! Dropped a %!
Data units written have fallen significantly vs when I first had the laptop.
View attachment 2546385
View attachment 2546386
View attachment 2546384
Math is not something I'm good at. That is a great question.I'd guess that if you had 1TB drive, there would be 8% loss now?
It’s typically relational, for example (via Samsung):Math is not something I'm good at. That is a great question.
I ran this through an LLM and it said that usually 1TB SSDs have significantly less TBWs than 4TB SSDs so while 92% is reasonable it would likely be less.
Very cool. I did not think of this till you mentioned it. Thank you
If we do some very simple math...I'd guess that if you had 1TB drive, there would be 8% loss now?
It’s typically relational, for example (via Samsung):
Warranty
As you can see, when the capacity doubles, quadruples, etc, so does the endurance. Basically, every drive has the same percentage of allotted spare blocks.
MZ-V9P1T0BW (1TB)
5-year or 600 TBW limited warrantyMZ-V9P2T0BW (2TB)
5-year or 1200 TBW limited warrantyMZ-V9P4T0BW (4TB)
5-year or 2400 TBW limited warranty
If we do some very simple math...
Estimating one-percent per 100 TBW, you’ll have worn the drive to 50% after 5 PBW (that’s five petabytes written). If we quarter that (i.e., divide by four), that’s 50% at 1.25 PBW. I seriously doubt the vast majority of users have a drive write a petabyte of data in the system’s realistically usable lifespan, or even get close.
Indeed. I’m not worried about the internal storage but using external just takes away any consideration as they’re fairly easy to swap. Even for video editing, a USB4 drive is plenty fast. My OWC 1M2’s have up to 3.8 GB/s read and write.This is why I'm a fan of doing most stuff on an external. I don't worry that much about the internal but doing more on the internal means you just replace it when it's worn out. I still do a lot of stuff on my iMac Pro including video editing but I can replace the internal SSD on it. I understand that you can do this on the Mini and Studio now too. I don't think that I'll find out as I mainly use an external but it's nice to know that it's possible.
Lets assume that internal ssd has TBW of 2400.It’s typically relational, for example (via Samsung):
Warranty
As you can see, when the capacity doubles, quadruples, etc, so does the endurance. Basically, every drive has the same percentage of allotted spare blocks.
MZ-V9P1T0BW (1TB)
5-year or 600 TBW limited warrantyMZ-V9P2T0BW (2TB)
5-year or 1200 TBW limited warrantyMZ-V9P4T0BW (4TB)
5-year or 2400 TBW limited warranty
If we do some very simple math...
Estimating one-percent per 100 TBW, you’ll have worn the drive to 50% after 5 PBW (that’s five petabytes written). If we quarter that (i.e., divide by four), that’s 50% at 1.25 PBW. I seriously doubt the vast majority of users have a drive write a petabyte of data in the system’s realistically usable lifespan, or even get close.
127/0,02= 6350 TBW.So if I'm doing math right (I am terrible ... at math)...
2% life used of my 4TB SSD with 127 TB written means my 4TB Apple SSD has an estimated 6930 TBW?
Good point.127/0,02= 6350 TBW.
It might be that.
Or something else.
Because the wear can be something else and Apple doesn't want to tell us.
How long you have had that MBP?