Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.

gank41

macrumors 601
Mar 25, 2008
4,066
4,607
I tried the trial version of the DriveDx app, and it's showing 18.7 TB of data written? I do have the 16GB/2TB model, but still.. Yikes.

Screen Shot 2021-02-16 at 9.47.24 AM.jpeg
 

alien3dx

macrumors 68020
Feb 12, 2017
2,188
525

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2021-02-16 at 11.55.11 PM.png
    Screenshot 2021-02-16 at 11.55.11 PM.png
    166 KB · Views: 321

Forti

macrumors regular
Original poster
Nov 14, 2018
174
282
Gdynia, Poland
dam you make me scare, on pronto download trial version
How long do you have this MacBook?
My MacBook Pro 13", which is 2 years and 3-4 months old have 47.5 TBW, which is ~~1.7-1.8 TBW / month.

from what I can see my Mac mini m1 will have 2-4 times more after 2 years.
 

gank41

macrumors 601
Mar 25, 2008
4,066
4,607
How long do you have this MacBook?
My MacBook Pro 13", which is 2 years and 3-4 months old have 47.5 TBW, which is ~~1.7-1.8 TBW / month.

from what I can see my Mac mini m1 will have 2-4 times more after 2 years.
I've got a 2020 M1 MBP w/ 16GB/2TB. This is after almost 4 days of uptime.

Screen Shot 2021-02-16 at 9.58.43 AM.jpeg
 
Last edited:

alien3dx

macrumors 68020
Feb 12, 2017
2,188
525
How long do you have this MacBook?
My MacBook Pro 13", which is 2 years and 3-4 months old have 47.5 TBW, which is ~~1.7-1.8 TBW / month.

from what I can see my Mac mini m1 will have 2-4 times more after 2 years.
6 January 2021 - 1 month maybe?
 

drobiu

macrumors newbie
Dec 31, 2020
9
4
Mine DriveDx shows not better results. 1.5 month "old" MBP 16/512

Normal usage, no projects at all
Screen Shot 2021-02-16 17.21.58 PM.png
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Forti

Forti

macrumors regular
Original poster
Nov 14, 2018
174
282
Gdynia, Poland
This is huge! I'm curious if this is sensor issue (I tried with two different tools) or it's macOS with m1 issue.

edit:
@alien3dx so basically you have 22.1 TB after 3 yers on iMac, and 1.8 TB after 1.5 month with m1. This is huge :eek:
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire

alien3dx

macrumors 68020
Feb 12, 2017
2,188
525
This is huge! I'm curious if this is sensor issue (I tried with two different tools) or it's macOS with m1 issue.

edit:
@alien3dx so basically you have 22.1 TB after 3 yers on iMac, and 1.8 TB after 1.5 month with m1. This is huge :eek:
macbook m1 more on travel meeting customer not much doing are rarely on.

iMac more on react native , php+mysql , android studio and xcode .
** all crazy project programming
 

svanstrom

macrumors 6502a
Feb 8, 2002
787
1,745
??
This is huge! I'm curious if this is sensor issue (I tried with two different tools) or it's macOS with m1 issue.

edit:
@alien3dx so basically you have 22.1 TB after 3 yers on iMac, and 1.8 TB after 1.5 month with m1. This is huge :eek:
Probably only "huge" because you are completely dismissing that first hit of system upgrades and photos syncing and being processed and installation and setups of your dev environments etc?
 

Forti

macrumors regular
Original poster
Nov 14, 2018
174
282
Gdynia, Poland
Probably only "huge" because you are completely dismissing that first hit of system upgrades and photos syncing and being processed and installation and setups of your dev environments etc?

I'm not syncing photos from iCloud (almost 200gb of them). And all the installation, setup dev env etc - it shouldn't write over 1TB in just 8 days :)

I could understand 100-200gb in some edge cases, but not 1TB.
 

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,651
12,792
High disk writes seem to be par for the course for Macs.


According to this article a modern SSD should last between 700 TBW and 1 PetaByte, which would give you a much longer lifespan. The article is more than 3 years old, and SSDs are always improving.

I'm going to look into this more - interesting subject !

According to what I found apple is probably using the TLC NAND from Western Digital, which should have 150TBW for each 250gb ssd (512ssd = 300TBW) but once again - no one knows it.

To be honest I'm expecting one of three different solutions:
- one of the future macOS update will fix it
- like someone told before - it can be just a "sensor bug"
- in next 1-2 year we are gonna see ssd repair program

Note, those factor in controller performance. Warranty TBW values also factor in write amplification. M1 Macs use a proprietary storage controller built-in to the M1 itself.

Raw P/E cycles, you're looking at:

10,000 5x nm MLC
5,000 3x nm MLC
3,000 2x nm MLC
1,000 planar TLC
3,000 3D TLC

3D TLC is what the M1 Macs are most likely to have so going purely by P/E cycle count, in terms of NAND writes that's:

768 TBW: 256 GB
1.536 PBW: 512 GB
3.072 PBW: 1 TB
6.144 PBW: 2 TB

Those figures are at 1x write amplification and rated cycles are usually minimums that all the cells are able to meet. You'd normally risk data corruption if you exceed those figures but perhaps Apple has found a way to maximize NAND life. I mean, they did buy Anobit.

Mind, I monitored changes in the S.M.A.R.T. TBW value and compared it Disk Writes in Activity Monitor while doing an iPhone backup and found it to be fairly accurate.
 

theSeb

macrumors 604
Aug 10, 2010
7,466
1,893
none
yeah .. seem okay for me, nothing weird. Maybe something else. Maybe new computer apple iCloud sync ? I think prefer to see this month vs next month. Just relax and enjoy new computer . Cheers man.
I don't think @Forti downloaded around 1 TB from his cloud account.
 

alien3dx

macrumors 68020
Feb 12, 2017
2,188
525
I don't think @Forti downloaded around 1 TB from his cloud account.
i know but i used ssd from 2014 and still can be used till now(sandisk ssd plus) . I rather not to think so much about it as if i want to download i will used platter drive and if real work only on main drive .

I cannot give answer as i not apple engineer or i experty on apple device.For me apple just a tool todo my job.
 

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,651
12,792
For those with DriveDx, can you please share the Drive Capacity, Life Percentage Used and Data Units Written for your SSD? I think that would help us estimate the TBW lifespan for Apple "SSDs".

If Life Percentage Used is still 0%, then at the very least, we're looking at a minimum TBW lifespan of Data Units Written * 100 for a given capacity and workload.
 

Forti

macrumors regular
Original poster
Nov 14, 2018
174
282
Gdynia, Poland
i know but i used ssd from 2014 and still can be used till now(sandisk ssd plus) . I rather not to think so much about it as if i want to download i will used platter drive and if real work only on main drive .

I cannot give answer as i not apple engineer or i experty on apple device.For me apple just a tool todo my job.

this is pure math, and you have an example from your MacBook and iMac. Same from my:
MacBook Pro 13" 256/16, after 27-28 months: 47.5 TBW (around ~~0.06 TBW /day)
Mac mini m1 256/16, after 8 days: 1 TBW (around ~~0.13 TBW /day)

Both machine's I'm using for the exactly same task. Nothing more, nothing less. The same programs, same tools, same stuff.

I will keep monitor it and give another post here in next 2-3 weeks just to see how much will it grow :)

@rui no onna -

Macbook intel:
I have it for 2 years, 3-4 months (using for daily job, 6-14 hours / day)
Drive capacity: 256 ssd
life percentage used: 6 (94% left)
Data units written: 47.5 TB (102 445 782)

Mac mini m1:
8 days, same as above, 6-14 hours / per
Drive capacity: 256 ssd
life percentage used: 0 (100% left)
Data units written: 1.0 TB (2 053 993)
 
  • Like
Reactions: rui no onna

svanstrom

macrumors 6502a
Feb 8, 2002
787
1,745
??
For those with DriveDx, can you please share the Drive Capacity, Life Percentage Used and Data Units Written for your SSD? I think that would help us estimate the TBW lifespan for Apple "SSDs".

If Life Percentage Used is still 0%, then at the very least, we're looking at a minimum TBW lifespan of Data Units Written * 100 for a given capacity and workload.
Why specifically from DriveDx? ?
 

theSeb

macrumors 604
Aug 10, 2010
7,466
1,893
none
i know but i used ssd from 2014 and still can be used till now(sandisk ssd plus) . I rather not to think so much about it as if i want to download i will used platter drive and if real work only on main drive .

I cannot give answer as i not apple engineer or i experty on apple device.For me apple just a tool todo my job.
Sure. I am still occasionally using a 2012 first generation 15" retina Macbook Pro. The 512 GB SSD still works fine in there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: alien3dx

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,651
12,792
Why specifically from DriveDx? ?

smartctl works fine, too. I think one of them uses binary and the other decimal, though.

This is with M1 MBA 8C/8GB/512GB. At 3,000 P/E cycles, I would expect to see 1% Life Percentage Used when it reaches 15-16TB lifetime writes. We'll see if Apple has them rated for higher.

Screen Shot 2021-01-01 at 3.32.40 PM.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire

drobiu

macrumors newbie
Dec 31, 2020
9
4
For those with DriveDx, can you please share the Drive Capacity, Life Percentage Used and Data Units Written for your SSD? I think that would help us estimate the TBW lifespan for Apple "SSDs".

If Life Percentage Used is still 0%, then at the very least, we're looking at a minimum TBW lifespan of Data Units Written * 100 for a given capacity and workload.
Here You go:
Screen Shot 2021-02-16 18.29.56 PM.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,651
12,792

Thanks! Can you post a screenshot from the Health Indicators tab, please? I expect Lifetime Percentage Used is 0 but I just want to confirm. If so, that suggests at least 2.3 PBW for the 500GB SSD so Apple's "SSD" is possibly rated for higher than 3,000 cycles or has greater overprovisioning.
 

rui no onna

Contributor
Oct 25, 2013
14,651
12,792
Macbook intel:
I have it for 2 years, 3-4 months (using for daily job, 6-14 hours / day)
Drive capacity: 256 ssd
life percentage used: 6 (94% left)
Data units written: 47.5 TB (102 445 782)

Mac mini m1:
8 days, same as above, 6-14 hours / per
Drive capacity: 256 ssd
life percentage used: 0 (100% left)
Data units written: 1.0 TB (2 053 993)

Thanks! That Intel seems to be pretty spot on for 3000 P/E cycles as it's tracking ~790 TBW (47.5 / 0.06).

I guess we're at wait and see for the M1.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.