Phrehdd
I think a qnap409 is in my future, how do you like it? Work as good as you hoped? Much in the way of firmware updates? Good throughput? I'm currently using a dns323 with 2 500G disks raid 1. I need way more space and I'm looking for something quiet and has a sleep mode.
Oh yeah, something that comes back on when the power returns would be nice, the dns323 does not. That alone sucks when you have a symbolic link to your itunes library on the NAS!
Frank
The QNAP409pro is a mixed bag with some areas being mildly "buggy" in my estimates. Do I get good use out of it... absolutely.
1) For reads it does fine
2) For writes, like many NAS out there, slow
3) Reconnection to the NAS, fair..a little slow but discs do take time to synch up properly which is acceptable.
4) Media Share via Twonky - it does work for PS3 and in my case, it can find it whether wireless or direct cable or router bridge (wireless).
5) Add a file to your media library, don't expect QNAP's Twonky to work as it should and add the file properly to its db. Rather, it at times is faster to rebuild the db than to "rescan on manual command."
6) The QNAP509pro, gets top marks for speed. I would consider this even knowing it might have the shortfalls of the 409pro.
7) Permissions, one level deep only. For me this is not a problem but for others it could be.
8) I dont use the Web Server portion so I cannot comment on it.
9) Fan always is going..it doesn't sleep and I wouldn't sleep with it in the same room but overall it is not a noisy system..simply the sound of a fan for the most part humming.
The problem with many of these NAS, is the price vs guts. Many solder in the memory so you cannot upgrade it yourself. Take a look at the difference in the 409 and the 509 series on RAM. Huge difference and yes, it does impact performance in certain activities.
If I had more patience, I might have made a FreeNAS type system with an ITX board or mATX either with software raid or possibly a card akin to say a broadcom.
I would give the QNAP409 a B on doing its main function but a C- on exploitability of added features. - They work but are quirky.
Itunes - If you only store 1 version of your file (I often have two - lossless and lossee aac 256/320 bit rates). I let the local Mac do the work and organize it properly. I then move it up to the NAS and "add" without moving.
This way, I have all my files organized itune style and on the NAS. Yes, its an extra step but pointing directly to your NAS causes issues when the NAS is not ready. (The library db is local and the files on NAS). This method lets me hook in my other Mac to the same library and make any playlists I like.
What I might suggest is you go to QNAP's forum site and see other folks commentaries. Some might be doing far better than myself in their experience and certainly, many far worse <grin>.
I guess I expect far more for the price. BTW I did have the NV+ that Netgear now sells from back when. It did better in certain respects but yet, the drive drawers were cheap and jammed (as did a friend of mine who admitted it later after recommending it to me).
- Phrehdd