The only thing worse than making bold predictions about whether or not something will sell is people who actually bookmark or ical predictions so they can come back a year later to try and rub some anonymous posters nose in it a year later. Seriously, this is pathetic. I thought only the 12 year olds running MacDailyNews did that when anyone dares to write something negative about Apple.
To that point, I wonder if anyone remembers Wired magazine giving apple the top 100 list of things to do to save Apple. Apple followed nearly ALL of the points to the tee and came out on to of the world. Of course if this forum existed we'd have a bunch of tail grabbing followers saying how Wired as a bunch of ^%@#%@.
I know.
EVERYONE is talking about that Windows tablet. EVERYONE.
No one is talking about or interested in the iPad. NO ONE.
This thread is an abomination.
This is what we call a coward's retreat in debate. You move the nomenclature into a extremist terms such as "everyone" and "no one" of which is immediately absurd to the mind and the proposed debate so that you can forge a fake victory.
Score 0; you have been disqualified.
A media reader that can't display 75% of online video.
Yeah, and I can't WAIT to see what universal codec is going to solve the world's video demand in HTML 5. HTML 5 appeals to hacks who don't have the formal education to learn object oriented languages such as ActionScript. The most naive mantra of the common consumer is to assume that Adobe is going to sit on their hands for the next 2 years while they currently enjoy 99% of the rich media market to date. Absolutely ridiculous. They have been creating an optimized iPhone client for over a year, but Apple won't certify it because an AS coder would DESTROY the App store's viability, and they know it.
Flash is competition, plain and simple.