There’s no whimsy anymore. UX is plain and monotone. hopefully this will be fixed
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Tahoe's Terrible Icons
- Thread starter turbineseaplane
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
because you're in control of what's 'right or wrong'? unbelievable 🤪
I really couldn’t care less about an app icon design. My workflow doesn’t depend on that.
You're complaining about icons when they spent a decade on Swift instead of modernizing ObjC and keeping the performance improvements and dynamic capabilities and we still have a WIP language where most of the OS is still ObjC/C/C++ as it should be.
Hell, Fortran is now en vogue because we need it for HPC and AI. Too bad Apple has spent jack on incorporating Flang into the OS and providing some compelling HPC and AI developer tools with such language that all applied sciences need on Supercomputers and more.
Hell, Fortran is now en vogue because we need it for HPC and AI. Too bad Apple has spent jack on incorporating Flang into the OS and providing some compelling HPC and AI developer tools with such language that all applied sciences need on Supercomputers and more.
Tahoe icons aren't really all that healthy either...
It could just be me, but the previous versions of the icons look old and out of date. Adobe and Microsoft updated their icons for Tahoe and they're an improvement.Paul Kafasis with a wonderful breakdown, icon by icon.
Some of my favorites:
The left-side tabs on the old Contacts icon were odd, but this new icon is even odder.
Is the cover of that book made of glass?
Hey, look, it’s Contacts, but far worse! This no longer looks like a book at all.
It’s just a gray “a” blob.
Look at the beautiful photorealistic glass on the loupe in the old Preview icon.
They sucked the soul out of it, and ironically, the new Liquid Glass version barely looks like a loupe at all.
Good point!
That's an optical illusion, it's actually the same width. That being said back in the day this would have been thought about and optically aligned so that the illusion was not apparent. There are so many design fundamentals broken at Apple today.
Please explain and expound, clearly you feel different that this isn't a matter of taste or personal preference. Please back up your statement.
Yes, for what is worth, pasting that image into images.google.com didn't return any source other than MacRumors.
I don't think they're that terrible. I personally wasn't a fan of the Big Sur icons which were like iOS but some had the odd bit poking out. Then you had a weird mix of symbol iOS style (like Safari for example) paired with other icons which had a photorealistic realistic pen on them. You also had some apps, like Spotify, that didn't adhere to the guidelines at all.
Tahoes icons are at least all now consistent with iOS. There are still some weird quirks (what's a 3D loupe for Preview doing in there when the design is supposed to be flat layers of glass material?) but overall fit together much better than the previous ones.
I also really like the new Contacts icon!
Tahoes icons are at least all now consistent with iOS. There are still some weird quirks (what's a 3D loupe for Preview doing in there when the design is supposed to be flat layers of glass material?) but overall fit together much better than the previous ones.
I also really like the new Contacts icon!
Is this for real?! Is iOS the same? (Obviously I haven’t moved yet. I usually wait for the second update on macOS.) If so I doubt it will last. I liked having the date there, and thought iOS, showing both day of the week and day of the month was best. Is there a setting for it, to change it to show the date?
Aesthetics are subjective and I’ve found I can adjust to almost anything, but I’m always interested in people’s reactions to visual changes.
What's crazy is someone in the other thread corrected him before he posted it in this one... is he intentionally ignoring reality to try and get a cheap shot in at Apple? There's plenty to criticize them for without making stuff up!
No, and no.
This how it looks on my Mac:
OK, I have to add... this is how it appears in my dock (and in Spotlight)
In the application folder, in dark mode, it appears like this
Last edited:
The problem is that the hard drive appears to be positioned in front of you, like the old icon was. You can tell because you can see the front side of it, with the, well I don't know what those are. Holes? Since the sides are parallel, this means that the the real object is actually getting larger as you go backwards.
The fact that the icon's lines are parallel is the problem--they shouldn't be.
No, but the stupidly curved window corners are ruining my life.
You have to remember that Liquid Glass is 'magical'.
Who cares how the old icons looked like. We’ve seen them for 10 years. We just want something new and fresh. Kudos to Apple
Forum is complaining like usual
Forum is complaining like usual
To me it seems like an excuse to get away with less effort. Simple can be beautiful, but these aren’t. They’re just plain and poorly done. And blurry
Can we quit using words like “soulful” to describe icons? That rubs me as so silly
Anyway, these icons suck and they’re worse than any previous iteration because they’re all lower contrast and more blurry. It looks bizarre on today’s high resolution screens and many of them are hard to differentiate because they’re just white blobs on top of the same shade
Assuming that they are trying to mimic a realistic 3D perspective. But maybe this icon can be seen as an example of oblique projection.
I have to say that I'm not an expert of technical drawing, but I know for sure that icons are meant to convey an idea, not to represent objects realistically.
Feels so at odds with all the focus on retina screen quality, doesn’t it?
People who want change for the sake of change are as bad as people who resist all changes
Some changes are good, some are bad. Some are subjective
In the case of these icons, there are some subjective reasons the majority dislike them (“ugly” etc) and some objective reasons they’re worse (lower contrast makes them harder to interpret, lower detail makes them harder to interpret, etc)