If you beg to differ then please explain why the media on purpose left out of their articles on Rashford partying that he was out celebrating his birthday. Therefore please explain why the media deliberately intended to mislead their readers so they would believe Rashford did not care about the loss. THIS is what the media had intended. They were not interested in reporting the truth. All they wanted to do was show Rashford in a bad light and it worked because the club had to take some kind of action against him.No.
I beg to differ.
The media are an obvious and all too easy target, not least because football (with the Premiership when it was first started) sold themsleves to the media (in return for endless coverage), thus giving rise to an increasingly symbiotic relationship.
Given the resources many of these clubs have at their disposal, they are businesses with, in some cases bottomless resources - at the top level, some of them can afford to pay their players salaries of five and six figures a week - are you seriously suggesting that managers (and players) cannot take courses in, study, be taught how to address questions, (answer and not answer, stall, deflect, answer succinctly and tersely), deal with the media, employ clued-in staff with a brief on how to deal with social media so that their version of events is published quickly, and so on.
The media are to blame 100%.