This all comes down to too much battery, in MY opinion (notice this is my opinion only, so if yours differs, please do not be offended).
J
ps you should ignore any idea that the bezel needs to be that thick to ensure rigidity of the screen..... that sony above was very stiff and strong screen while still having minimal bezel AND very thin -
If the above were true, it would follow that the 13's bezel would be even thicker than the 11's. It isn't.
I agree.I spend my time focused on the screen, and not the bezel that surrounds it.
in MY opinion (notice this is my opinion only, so if yours differs, please do not be offended).
I agree.
It never ceases to amaze me, just how many Mac users obsess over the looks of the bezel on their laptops. I've read about those who won't buy a certain model MBP because it's bezel is not black, and on and on.
I'm so busy using and enjoying my Macs, the bezel isn't even on my radar.
It's not about the looks. The point is, a 13" screen could've been fit in there. That would be one hell of a laptop.
Hahaha this is funny. It is ridiculous that people get offended if you like what they don't or don't like what they like
Scottsdale, you do not know what you are talking about. The bezel is HUGE and they could have made it smaller. You are wrong!
Do a mockup of this. Either you're going to widen the screen but not make it taller, keeping the same bezel top and bottom (which will look bizarre), or you're going to make it taller as well as wider, losing the space for the camera. Or make it taller and have the bottom of the screen very close to the hinge. Any technical issues or economic issues aside (and you don't know what they might be until you actually try this - just because you can't think of any doesn't mean they aren't there), any sense of proportion goes out the window. But all this has been said countless times.
Just because you want it and think it can be done doesn't mean it can.
But boy oh boy, an extra 1.4" would have made it 'a hell of a laptop' (well, what is it now? A piece of junk?).
So the camera requires such bezel? Have you seen the 17" MBP?
I'm not a photoshop guy, if someone in here can make it happen please do.
Have you seen how the MBP has a thicker lid? Maybe that makes a difference to protecting the camera internals. But who knows? I assume Apple had a reason for what they did (a reason other than being dumb or lazy).
Are you a pencil and paper guy? That's enough.
the 13 inch has the minimum bezel size required to house the screen and camera, its thicker keyboard surround is dictated by that
the 11 has the minimum amount of keyboard surround to house the keyboard, its thicker screen bezel is dictated by that.
the only way to have a narrower bezel on the 11 would be to
go with a smaller keyboard and reduce the overall width of the machine so the top half doesnt need a big bezel round the existing 11.6 display, or
go with same screen bezel widths as the 13" and then commission a proprietary screen to suit the space that leaves you to play with. Which compared to the 'off the shelf readily available from multiple sources' 11.6 panel is going to add significantly to costs.
As someone that switched to the Air from the MBP, I really like the bezel. I think it looks great.
I'm not. Can't remember the last time I used a pencil. Since you brought it up, maybe you can something.
And 'protecting' the camera internals as in?
The reason could be the usual stuff, introducing a new revolutionary 13" MBA with the size of the current 11".
'Protecting the camera internals as in' putting an electronic device at the pinched edge of a wedge where there will be increased pressure on it (MBA) is very different from putting that device at the edge of a thicker box shape (MBP) which won't compress the same. It might be feasible in the future; they didn't do it now, too bad for the dude who can't even use a pencil, I guess.
Did I say I can't. I don't. Too bad for the dude who can't tell the difference between the two words.