So it finally came time to get serious about replacing the family/beach/utility/tow vehicle. As I’ve posted previously, it's a 4th gen T4R, V8/AWD, most options - it has done its duty, been on the beach countless times, pulled cars, boats, trailers, dealt with snow, sand, mud. We loved it.
I’ve made several posts about my thoughts on the replacement, but here’s a [not so] brief recap:
Ruled out up front the new 4R, it’s a solid SUV, but in 2018 it's time for a better transmission, the electronics are kind of dated (no CarPlay).
We really fell in love with the Jeep GC Overland with the High Altitude Package (we dig blacked out trim, dark wheels, dug the 5.7L V8 option, the look, the electronics.
Then, a 3rd row got more priority, JGC off the table.
We considered a land behemoth, Suburban/Yukon / Excursion, but they get stupid expensive quickly, ruled them out also because of their slightly too big size.
Ruled out the German options, they're just silly with option expenses, we owned a X5 4.4i so been there done that, and there are no local dealers (Audi and BMW dealers are a crappy hour drive away ...)
The Explorer Sport isn't a bad option, but there's a few things where it falls short (tranny, 3rd row space, a few other things).
The MDX popped up on the radar, but not the regular model, the Sport Hybrid, it's sporty, quick, has outstanding build/fit/finish, and 3rd row seats, however, it can't tow, and ultimately neither of us was a fan of the design.
My most recent post about this was highly favoring the Durango R/T, it looks great, has nearly the same seating room (3 row) as much bigger SUVs, Hemi is standard, sport lowered suspension, dynamic AWD with an actual low range (2-speed), for MY18 CarPlay and AA, same electronics as the GC (they’re outstanding), lots of passive and active safety (lane control, ACC),heated/cooled everything, inc. the 2nd row, remote start/hatch including smart app control, tows a bunch, easily.
SUVs can be boring to begin with, so we loved the idea of an in-your-face package like the R/T with a Hemi, with all blacked out trim, black chrome interior bits, and a big, bold color. This has the Blacktop package, so the wheels and side mirrors are black, the contrast looks pretty terrific against the exterior we chose.
We originally we're shopping Octane Red, it's kind of the "hot" color right now (see lots of small SAVs in that color), you know, the darker, +almost+ shifting into burgundy-ish type red - I really started digging the more red-red (Redline), it's a 2-stage pearl coat like Octane - plus all the other red highlights (all the interior stitching, etc.) match the Redline. The wife didn't care too much, just loved the overall look of the R/T (new for ‘18 it has the front, rear, over fenders and the awesome ducted/vented hood of the SRT).
Funny how this came together, we're headed OOT, and found this DDRT at a dealer on the way to our destination (Universal)!
So we're drove our "trade", the T4R which was really just a dealer buy since we're not applying any money from it, picking up the new ride, loading it up, continuing on our trip
So the new ride ...
'18 DD R/T Redline Pearl
AWD
Tech
Tow
Blacktop
Capt's Chairs
Redline with black interior. Funny enough my car is black with a red interior ... and the interior option is called Redline (it was meant to be )
Only got about an hour driving it (highway) but extremely pleased so far. It’s currently just hanging out in the parking garage at the resort while we relax at the pool with some tasty beverages
View attachment 763007
So it finally came time to get serious about replacing the family/beach/utility/tow vehicle. As I’ve posted previously, it's a 4th gen T4R, V8/AWD, most options - it has done its duty, been on the beach countless times, pulled cars, boats, trailers, dealt with snow, sand, mud. We loved it.
I’ve made several posts about my thoughts on the replacement, but here’s a [not so] brief recap:
Ruled out up front the new 4R, it’s a solid SUV, but in 2018 it's time for a better transmission, the electronics are kind of dated (no CarPlay).
We really fell in love with the Jeep GC Overland with the High Altitude Package (we dig blacked out trim, dark wheels, dug the 5.7L V8 option, the look, the electronics.
Then, a 3rd row got more priority, JGC off the table.
We considered a land behemoth, Suburban/Yukon / Excursion, but they get stupid expensive quickly, ruled them out also because of their slightly too big size.
Ruled out the German options, they're just silly with option expenses, we owned a X5 4.4i so been there done that, and there are no local dealers (Audi and BMW dealers are a crappy hour drive away ...)
The Explorer Sport isn't a bad option, but there's a few things where it falls short (tranny, 3rd row space, a few other things).
The MDX popped up on the radar, but not the regular model, the Sport Hybrid, it's sporty, quick, has outstanding build/fit/finish, and 3rd row seats, however, it can't tow, and ultimately neither of us was a fan of the design.
My most recent post about this was highly favoring the Durango R/T, it looks great, has nearly the same seating room (3 row) as much bigger SUVs, Hemi is standard, sport lowered suspension, dynamic AWD with an actual low range (2-speed), for MY18 CarPlay and AA, same electronics as the GC (they’re outstanding), lots of passive and active safety (lane control, ACC),heated/cooled everything, inc. the 2nd row, remote start/hatch including smart app control, tows a bunch, easily.
SUVs can be boring to begin with, so we loved the idea of an in-your-face package like the R/T with a Hemi, with all blacked out trim, black chrome interior bits, and a big, bold color. This has the Blacktop package, so the wheels and side mirrors are black, the contrast looks pretty terrific against the exterior we chose.
We originally we're shopping Octane Red, it's kind of the "hot" color right now (see lots of small SAVs in that color), you know, the darker, +almost+ shifting into burgundy-ish type red - I really started digging the more red-red (Redline), it's a 2-stage pearl coat like Octane - plus all the other red highlights (all the interior stitching, etc.) match the Redline. The wife didn't care too much, just loved the overall look of the R/T (new for ‘18 it has the front, rear, over fenders and the awesome ducted/vented hood of the SRT).
Funny how this came together, we're headed OOT, and found this DDRT at a dealer on the way to our destination (Universal)!
So we're drove our "trade", the T4R which was really just a dealer buy since we're not applying any money from it, picking up the new ride, loading it up, continuing on our trip
So the new ride ...
'18 DD R/T Redline Pearl
AWD
Tech
Tow
Blacktop
Capt's Chairs
Redline with black interior. Funny enough my car is black with a red interior ... and the interior option is called Redline (it was meant to be )
Only got about an hour driving it (highway) but extremely pleased so far. It’s currently just hanging out in the parking garage at the resort while we relax at the pool with some tasty beverages
View attachment 763007
Just how institutions work. I ran into this issue when I bought my first dealer car a few decades ago. Generally with large purchases, you want a cashier's check. Any good dealer will call up the bank and verify the issuance is legitimate. You dealt with a crappy dealer and I guess your CU is to blame, too.I’m not sure what the problem was.
The CU is not to blame really, imo. They did not put a stop on my check.Looks awesome. As I said the other day, it's a great looking car and seems to make you guys happy and that's what counts. It does look pretty mean, so it'll stand out in the sea of SUVs. Octane Red always gives me a hankering for liver and onions. It's one of those things.
I suspect the other part of your trip turned out to be an awesome surprise, too. Anyway, like I said, it'll contrast with your Mustang that's black with red trim here and there. One thing that surprises me is I had no freaking idea the Durango came with captain's chairs. Unless I did recommend it/bring it up and my memory sucks. Happy cruising!
RE Toyota 4 Runner: I caught Doug Lovato's video last week of an optioned out 4 Runner with a metallic blue paint. I had to rewind three times thinking I was hearing the total price wrong. Toyota could charge an extra 15 grand and people would still buy it. INSANE!
Most of us gawk at the new Accord's pricing when optioned out, but Toyota takes it to a whole new level on an old platform and non-efficient engine, while not having newer tech.
[doublepost=1527277497][/doublepost]
Just how institutions work. I ran into this issue when I bought my first dealer car a few decades ago. Generally with large purchases, you want a cashier's check. Any good dealer will call up the bank and verify the issuance is legitimate. You dealt with a crappy dealer and I guess your CU is to blame, too.
These days buying something expensive as a car or property is a vastly different experience. Plus it comes with espresso and dessert. They've got some health consequence crap, too. You know, that stuff that looks and tastes like gerbil food.
That said, for my current car which I bought a while back I did a trade in, plus check and paid off the rest of the balance within 6-8 months. I paid just over MSRP for something that was just about fully loaded. Repeat customer benefit, I suppose. When car shopping, go for someone middle aged or older. They're a no-bull-**** type of person unlike the younger rascals that behave like sharks wanting a meal. And those rascals, such drama queens.
All the current models sold are all around $75,000 for a $35,000 car. Until they can sell at close to $35,000, this is meaningless.Elon Musk Made some interesting announcements and statements:
Its announced the Model 3 will now be offered in July with a performance model that has the ability to have a dual motor AWD that will top at 155 MPH at 0-60 in 3.5. It includes a carbon fiber spoiler, 20” wheels and white/black interior. Starting price is at $78,000. (Considering a base model starts around $35,000).
Musk quotes: “The AWD performance Model 3 [Can beat anything in its class at the track].”
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2018/05/19...ns-for-teslas-model-3-calling-it-amazing.html
All the current models sold are all around $75,000 for a $35,000 car. Until they can sell at close to $35,000, this is meaningless.
Maybe, but I'm more inclined to believe that performance models have such high margins that Tesla almost has to push them. It would appear Tesla simply cannot afford to sell a $35,000 BEV.Musk is pushing the performance marketing, just a guess, perhaps its because Porsche has their EV in the upcoming.
Just how many new future vehicles do you think Elon can introduce to the world before they latch onto reality and figure out what Tesla's doing?Maybe, but I'm more inclined to believe that performance models have such high margins that Tesla almost has to push them. It would appear Tesla simply cannot afford to sell a $35,000 BEV.
Can I ask how much it cost? In 2013 we were faced with the realization we really did not need a truck, and we needed to replace our aging Murano, so we went with a new Toyota Highlander, not the largest, but bigger than the Murano, it will hold 7 people, 3 rows of seats, the back ones fold down into the bed, and I can put 20, 8’ 2x4s in it in a pinch, for about $32k. It listed for $41k.
I love out Highlander Limited and use it occasionally for towing UHaul type trailers. It serves our needs well, gets good gas mileage, but I’m embarrassed to say I don’t know what size engine it has. If anything has aggravated me, it’s that this model (2013) is not easy to update it’s installed gps map. The dealer has to do it. that’s ok because I have my iPhone/Waze and a portable Garmin with lifetime maps, so I don’t update it.So on the lower end, the Highlander doesn't stack up vs. the base model DD, the latter comes standard with way more tow, the Highlander is sort of gutless with the base 2.7L 185HP option.
When you get into the mid/upper range Highlander with the 3.5L, it starts to balance out with the DD, the latter still has a good bit better tow capacity, and price comparison I haven't done a feature-vs-feature in the mid-range, there's a lot to consider: AWD options (FWIW, the DD is RWD when not AWD), electronics, safety, convenience, and of course more subjective stuff like styling. The Highlander does have 8 vs. 7 passenger (without 2nd row captains chair in either), but that's a 3rd row, limited travel distance, the DD has excellent space in all three rows, not from just specs, but actually sitting in the seats. Toyota is also _way_ behind in the electronics department, still no CP/AA, the overall system tech in the DD is extremely good (UConnection on an 8.4" display with an additional 7" drivers console display).
I'd imagine at the highest trim they both have plenty of tech: ACC, lane control, parking assist, all sorts of heated, cooled interior components, remote access, etc.
Then when you get into the next level of DD in terms of capacity/performance (not even counting the beastly SRT), the the Highlander get's really left behind, the 5.7L Hemi V8 (360/390) pushes the tow capacity up to 7400 lbs adds a better transmission, HD brakes - with the tow package it has oil coolers, transmission coolers, auto-leveling suspension - the R/T model (that's what we purchased) has sport suspension with selectable steering and throttle controls, Nappa leather, unique black chrome trim/front/rear facias, SRT hood, etc. Also the R/T with AWD is on demand + 2-speed diff with low range (i.e., off-road, it's way more capable).
The Highlander does offer a hybrid model which is kind of neat (reduces the tow capacity a good bit), the DD has a big gas tank, so even with the Hemi, it still should see a good 500+ miles of range.
DDs start at $29K, and for a loaded AWD R/T (with the few options for the trim level) get up to $50K-55K.
Drool...The dealer where we scored the new ride had some +nice+ classic MOPARs in the showroom (the owner is a huge car guy / collector). Just a couple of pics:
View attachment 763284
View attachment 763285
I love out Highlander Limited and use it occasionally for towing UHaul type trailers. It serves our needs well, gets good gas mileage, but I’m embarrassed to say I don’t know what size engine it has. If anything has aggravated me, it’s that this model (2013) is not easy to update it’s installed gps map. The dealer has to do it. that’s ok because I have my iPhone/Waze and a portable Garmin with lifetime maps, so I don’t update it.
Oh, the Toyota tailgate issue after I swapped out the tail light assembly, seems to have resolved itself.
Drool...
So, here's the thing. I heard this on a podcast and I believe it. Musk has an odd relationship to the media because Tesla cannot afford traditional marketing and advertising. Musk admits that Tesla doesn't advertise. The media is the only way to hear about Teslas. For this reason, when the tech media was promoting how great and innovative Tesla was, all was well. When it became clear Tesla is not a good manufacturer of automobiles, the media turned its tide. Now Musk is calling out the media because he can't afford bad press.Just how many new future vehicles do you think Elon can introduce to the world before they latch onto reality and figure out what Tesla's doing?
Nice ride.The lighting is fun, especially combined with the mean ~n~ nasty front end
View attachment 763345
(It's super bright white IRL, and the LED strip under the main headlights looks very slick - fogs are pairs of projector of LEDs as well)
Good post. Very good, and it's something I wanted to post, too. Though, it wasn't what I was alluding to. My point was, that at a certain point, even Tesla's fan boys will realize the company makes grand promises and delivers on some. And that each major unveiling sole goal is to raise capital to begin the project. The facts you pointed out merely solidifies that theory. Though, the funny bit is he's doing Queen Orange Julius's shtick. I would have thought a clever man like Elon would have realized that hasn't worked for anyone but the tangelo himself.So, here's the thing. I heard this on a podcast and I believe it. Musk has an odd relationship to the media because Tesla cannot afford traditional marketing and advertising. Musk admits that Tesla doesn't advertise. The media is the only way to hear about Teslas. For this reason, when the tech media was promoting how great and innovative Tesla was, all was well. When it became clear Tesla is not a good manufacturer of automobiles, the media turned its tide. Now Musk is calling out the media because he can't afford bad press.
Looks nice, DT. The sporty suspension must be a godsend on long road trips? Firm but smooth. And not smooth and wobbly.