Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

The iOS 9 Content Blocker thread

Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
KALLT said:
Since he is in that business, maybe he got pressure from his peers.
Click to expand...

I'm sure he did. I know Gruber acknowledge that Deck ad wasn't as bad as others. I just don't believe the "Something doesn't feel right"... We all here don't believe that nonsense.
 
Rigby said:
BTW, there's an interesting story reporting that the company behind Adblock Plus is offering money to developers of iOS ad blockers to let ads from their whitelist through:

http://www.businessinsider.com/adblock-plus-acceptable-ads-policy-2015-9

I think this will become a problem. There is a lot of money in the advertising business, and many developers will be tempted to accept "bribes" of one kind or another. This is compounded by the lack of transparency for the user: Since you cannot see the filter list in the popular apps, you don't really know what is blocked and what isn't, particularly when it comes to invisible trackers ...
Click to expand...
Adblock Plus has been doing that for years. Its just that now the story is getting more press due to content blocking with iOS 9. I think their practice model is underhanded and sneaky.
 
Cougarcat said:
It doesn't really make much sense to me but I'm sure we'll get a 2-hour explanation on ATP next week.
Click to expand...

His recent ATP episode... he speaks on using Ghostery database because he felt how good it was. He went through the necessary channels.. he had to give it some serious thought.

I already know the explanation won't make any sense to me... Especially given the fact how much he is against ads.
 
BasicGreatGuy said:
Adblock Plus has been doing that for years. Its just that now the story is getting more press due to content blocking with iOS 9. I think their practice model is underhanded and sneaky.
Click to expand...
Yeah, it was well known that Adblock Plus was taking money from advertisers. But I wasn't aware that they are offering money to other apps as well. Who can we trust? Mind you, I'm more concerned about privacy-violating trackers than ads ...
 
KALLT said:
To quote myself:


I knew that Marco Arment was not to be trusted. Less than 48 hours and he removes the app from the store. You don’t spend days or weeks developing such an app and then changing your mind after a serious cash-in, especially after he wrote his critical essay. Despicable.

Don’t buy apps from developers who have a conflict of interest.
Click to expand...

I agree.

An attack of conscience, after months of development and beta testing? He didn't know his app's main purpose was to block ads and his advertiser(s) had to remind him. What a terrible decision. This makes him look real bad.
 
Cougarcat said:
From his post it sounds like it was a mutual decision, and there won't be a Ghostery app at all in the future, until the backend these apps must use allow for more granular control
Click to expand...

Apps decide which websites/trackers to include and they can also whitelist sites easily. I don’t know what his app does, but if that was the problem then it was poorly conceptualised to begin with.
 
Rigby said:
Yeah, it was well known that Adblock Plus was taking money from advertisers. But I wasn't aware that they are offering money to other apps as well. Who can we trust? Mind you, I'm more concerned about privacy-violating trackers than ads ...
Click to expand...
Getting harder these days to be able to tell who we can trust.

I agree with you on privacy tracking violations. With iOS 9, we have been given back some power, which is a good thing.

I don't care to get into a big adblocking debate. I just want people to think about how ads, and tracking embedded in ads and the sites that host them, have become a nemesis for users. A site that we all visit every day and may call home, has its feet in the same waters.

The more sanitized my internet usage is, the better. And with Crystal and Blockr, amongst other beta ad blocking testing, I am pleased with the results thus far.
 
Rigby said:
Yeah, it was well known that Adblock Plus was taking money from advertisers. But I wasn't aware that they are offering money to other apps as well. Who can we trust? Mind you, I'm more concerned about privacy-violating trackers than ads ...
Click to expand...

Adblock Plus is very open about this practice. They inform you of this when you open the extension for the first time, they give you an opportunity to opt out at any time and they adhere to criteria they developed together with their community. They take money from big advertisers (not websites) to cover the expenses for negotiating and monitoring the individual agreements they make.

Adblock Plus also doesn’t block trackers, they block ads and they block only those ads that are intrusive or annoying. What they are doing now is incentivising iOS developers to do the same. As long as these developer are transparent about this, I see no problem.
 
The purify developer mentioned on Twitter that his coming out with a Mac safari version of the app and might be free if you bought the iOS version
 
Are there any reviews or people who did standardized tests on some of the paid blockers yet? % of trackers blocked, % of ads blocked, page load time, data usage etc? Since it is so new I'm doubting it but waiting for that before I pay for a couple of them.
 
Che Castro said:
The purify developer mentioned on Twitter that his coming out with a Mac safari version of the app and might be free if you bought the iOS version
Click to expand...

Which is weird, because Purify is based on uBlock… There are so many good extensions for Safari on the Mac, why bother paying for Purify just to get this?
 
Che Castro said:
The purify developer mentioned on Twitter that his coming out with a Mac safari version of the app and might be free if you bought the iOS version
Click to expand...
He is good about pimping his product on Twitter with his own self-promoting app graph and boasting about being mentioned at places x,y, and z. He also talks about appreciating the testers and users while not having an in app feedback method. He also doesn't seem to respond to Twitter posts, unless they are centered around praising his product.

He reminds me of a fast talking used car salesman. Say whatever it takes to make the sale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dammerl and scjr
Does anyone know if there is a content blocker currently in the App Store that is completely open source?
 
BasicGreatGuy said:
He is good about pimping his product on Twitter with his own self-promoting app graph and boasting about being mentioned at places x,y, and z. He also talks about appreciating the testers and users while not having an in app feedback method. He also doesn't seem to respond to Twitter posts, unless they are centered around praising his product.

He reminds me of a fast talking used car salesman. Say whatever it takes to make the sale.
Click to expand...

It reminds of the guy who was so proud of his content blocker on Twitter, then pulled it from the App Store two days after release.
 
BasicGreatGuy said:
He is good about pimping his product on Twitter with his own self-promoting app graph and boasting about being mentioned at places x,y, and z. He also talks about appreciating the testers and users while not having an in app feedback method. He also doesn't seem to respond to Twitter posts, unless they are centered around praising his product.

He reminds me of a fast talking used car salesman. Say whatever it takes to make the sale.
Click to expand...

what adblocker do you recommend atm?

i think Crystal is the best.
 
BasicGreatGuy said:
He is good about pimping his product on Twitter with his own self-promoting app graph and boasting about being mentioned at places x,y, and z. He also talks about appreciating the testers and users while not having an in app feedback method. He also doesn't seem to respond to Twitter posts, unless they are centered around praising his product.

He reminds me of a fast talking used car salesman. Say whatever it takes to make the sale.
Click to expand...
At least his not gonna chicken out like Marco
 
  • Like
Reactions: scjr
hank moody said:
what adblocker do you recommend atm?

i think Crystal is the best.
Click to expand...
I like Crystal thus far. It hasn't gotten everything. I have provided recent feedback on a few sites. I will pay close attention as to whether or not the feedback is put into place or ignored, either through no response from the developer or a lack of implementation.

At this point in time, I am still in the testing phase with the content blockers. I think it is way too early to hang my hat on one content blocking app.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ladybug
NightStorm said:
Even worse, most people don't know that you can even request a refund... and there is no guarantee Apple will issue one.
Click to expand...

Just requested mine and got it -

"We have received your request to cancel the purchase of Peace: Block Ads and Trackers, Powered by Ghostery® made on 17 September 2015. You should receive your refund for this app in five to seven working days."
 
  • Like
Reactions: NightStorm
Rogifan said:
Btw, if you use Purify you can use the share sheet to whitelist sites. I did it for daringfireball and loopinsight.
Click to expand...

Do you use Purify only? Debating on whether to request a refund for Peace... But I have Crystal & Peace installed now.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back