I am not sure who you are referring to when you say that “people tend to prefer to put their brands on a pedestal”. If it was directed at my comment, then I submit that it was misdirected.I probably should remember I am on a forum so people here tend to prefer to put their brands on a pedestal more than anything…
Apple vision for iPad was a larger iPhone. The industry followed. But that has run its course. I am not, in this instance, talking about macOS on an iPad or a MacBook Air. I am talking about Apple allowing iPadOS to branch itself from iOS so that applications can be created that aren’t forced to be designed around iPhone constraints. On an iPhone I would prefer very strict limits on background processes, as I noted earlier, so I have a charge as long as possible. it is stupid that my SSH app can’t keep the connection process running for more than 30 seconds if I switch to another application unless they use the “location services” hack. There are many third party applications that would be created with iPadOS tweaking its model to align with a device with a much larger battery and different uses case.
That’s my only point. Developers see iPads as larger iPhones because that is the vision Apple has shared with them.
iPadOS has yet to become its own...
I am not particularly enamoured by Apple or it’s products. I use the IPP extensively since it fits my needs much better than the alternatives available. That said, I am also realistic enough to recognise what Apple has been doing and their - for lack of a better term - marketing virtuosity.
Having said that, I would also agree with you that developers likely see the iPad as a large iPhone. I also wonder if it actually suits Apple’s strategic purpose in maintaining that point of view because if they disturb the balance, then that will impact other products in their portfolio. Of course, there are some seemingly inexplicable things that Apple seems to have done with the iPad. For example, multi user capability. Clearly, it can be done without much hassle yet they resist. If Apple was truly thinking of a mass computing device (which is distinct from the common understanding of a computer), then one assumes they would have enabled this as it would allow families to buy a single iPad and share it within the family. But then again, Apple likely has their own logic and rationalisation about this. There are other examples of this that apply to the iPad