The only thing a 2012 does not do is 4K video output (>30Hz).
If you want a Mini that does 4K, you have to wait. Period.
And maybe for a long time.
whats up Apple?
just bought the base late 2012 model, 5400-rpm HDD is ultra slow and HD4000 out of date, but I couldn't wait any longer.
just bought the base late 2012 model, 5400-rpm HDD is ultra slow and HD4000 out of date, but I couldn't wait any longer. In my opinion new model won't see the light of day this year and will be introduced at WWDC '15.
Normally I would do all that stuff because it sounds like a smart move. But, however, I will not be able to do it today as I am busy looking for my crack pipe and that is taking all my time.
I am calculating where I may have put it on an Excel spreadsheet on my OLD Mac mini!
[/COLOR]
Here is file that make Mini Computer very faster! Only to click link and check automatic your machine for many virus, clean free! Make like new machine!
http://www.theverge.com/products/macintosh-128k/6357
(dellor cam neeb ev'uoY)
AFAIK,When does Apple period "mid 2014" expire?
I think we will see the new Haswell Mac mini between 10. September 2014 and 31. October 2014.
When does Apple period "mid 2014" expire? Is it possible to see a new Mini before the end of August?
..and of course mac mini page is dusty for a long time ago. There is no flash storage, and every Mac have already graphic 5000 and haswell of course.
Only.. if my logic is correct, I think we will not see new mac mini design. But maybe this is better
:
just bought the base late 2012 model, 5400-rpm HDD is ultra slow and HD4000 out of date, but I couldn't wait any longer. In my opinion new model won't see the light of day this year and will be introduced at WWDC '15.
Maybe Apple Don want to eat bread the iMac, of course but I think the mini fills the gap on two very important markets: media center (or living room pc) which uses to connect the mini to big TV as monitor (40"+),and the other special market is the high end calibrated graphics displays ( some professional simple can't calibrate enough an iMac to reach they exigencies) very Common at newspapers and advertising photo editing workstations, the first need a 4K capable mini *don't bother if game capable*, the later also need an more powerful mini if possible loaded with powerful GPU for gpu accelerated apps (open cl, cuda)... So I believe on a fairly loaded mini to come soon.and.. don't forget something important. Apple don't want mac mini "eat bread" of the iMac. For apple mac mini is not priority product and will never see something special for this computer, but they have to hold it high because this is Apple.
Maybe you are right for this "full passive cooling , smaller footprint, etc etc..", but not in the near future.
[/COLOR]I forgot, an passively cooled mini will make it the "de facto" std on sound recording studios and other audio related applications which now uses a mac book air.
Not mandatory to migrate to Broadwell or Skylane unless you wanna keep the form factor unchanged, so if Apple delivers an cylinder *Mac Pro* like mini a full passive cooling with Haswell could be achieved also with 65W cpu as actually existing fanless custom pc achieves at room temperature, and all this at the half size of a mac pro (I'm familiar with current fanless pc).It may be possible for lower end Broadwell processors to be fanless but may have to wait for Skylake to be totally fanless at higher end and that's a couple of years away the way Intel is delaying and dealing with manufacturing woes.
And of course we don't know what Apple has planned for ARM.
Not mandatory to migrate to Broadwell or Skylane unless you wanna keep the form factor unchanged, so if Apple delivers an cylinder *Mac Pro* like mini a full passive cooling with Haswell could be achieved also with 65W cpu as actually existing fanless custom pc achieves at room temperature, and all this at the half size of a mac pro (I'm familiar with current fanless pc).
About ARM, this will not happen at least to personal Mac, but a possibility for Mac servers (also a mac server appliance), but on medium term, Intel provides the best solution by far.
All investment depends on returns, if you invest A to gain A+B, be sure Apple will got this *B* profit, not matters if account for 1% (which in Apple scales could mean hundred millions), look at Zotac they do the R&D for their Haswell mini pc, I think they don't sell 10% of units Apple sells as Mac Minis, and actually Zotac is one of the most profitable pc vendor.Unfortunately, IMHO, Apple looks at the Mini as an entry level lowest priority desktop machine it makes. Thats 3 strikes and if you add profit per machine to that, that's four strikes.
And considering that the desktop PC is only 20% of their business which IMac is their most profitable and popular, I would say the Mini has been lucky to survive. It may count for 1% of profit but I doubt it. More like .1%.
I doubt that they will invest a whole lot into R&D.
All investment depends on returns, if you invest A to gain A+B, be sure Apple will got this *B* profit, not matters if account for 1% (which in Apple scales could mean hundred millions), look at Zotac they do the R&D for their Haswell mini pc, I think they don't sell 10% of units Apple sells as Mac Minis, andactually Zotac is one of the most profitable pc vendor.