Image
Yes, it has been way too long since you updated the Mac Mini
I'm (cautiously) hopeful that some of the exciting ideas in many recent posts come true next week.
I looked at this graphic, and the word "stylus" comes to mind. I hope that's wrong.
Well, I have my iMac for 5,5 years and the model itself is 6,5 years old and my Super Drive still works. In fact the whole machine works just fine and the only problem I had was a fried power supply and even that only happened because of a power surge!
Maybe I'm lucky hehe
I like this Idea from TUAW: A new Mac mini?
"The words "It's been way too long" can be interpreted any number of ways. My first guess is that they're referring to the 715 days since the Mac mini was last updated. Apple's least expensive Mac (well, at least if you already have a monitor, keyboard, and pointing device on hand) has been ignored far too long, and it's still one of the more popular server devices for small business.
The current MD388LL/A (and MD389LL/A server) Mac mini model features up to a 2.6 GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 as a configure-to-order option, allows for up to 16 GB of RAM, has a built-in Intel HD Graphics 4000 processor, and has one Thunderbolt and four USB 3.0 ports.
Let's say that Apple decides to follow the design cues of the Mac Pro and turn the Mac mini into a squat cylinder, bumps the CPU to a quad-core 3.7 GHz Intel Xeon ("Ivy Bridge-EP"), adds RAM expandibility to 32 GB, and sports an AMD FirePro D300 graphics coprocessor. Throw in 802.11ac capability and Thunderbolt 2, and you've got quite the nice little machine."
I like this Idea from TUAW: A new Mac mini?
"The words "It's been way too long" can be interpreted any number of ways. My first guess is that they're referring to the 715 days since the Mac mini was last updated. Apple's least expensive Mac (well, at least if you already have a monitor, keyboard, and pointing device on hand) has been ignored far too long, and it's still one of the more popular server devices for small business.
The current MD388LL/A (and MD389LL/A server) Mac mini model features up to a 2.6 GHz quad-core Intel Core i7 as a configure-to-order option, allows for up to 16 GB of RAM, has a built-in Intel HD Graphics 4000 processor, and has one Thunderbolt and four USB 3.0 ports.
Let's say that Apple decides to follow the design cues of the Mac Pro and turn the Mac mini into a squat cylinder, bumps the CPU to a quad-core 3.7 GHz Intel Xeon ("Ivy Bridge-EP"), adds RAM expandibility to 32 GB, and sports an AMD FirePro D300 graphics coprocessor. Throw in 802.11ac capability and Thunderbolt 2, and you've got quite the nice little machine."
That is a horrible idea... A machine like that would cost at least $2000+
How bout instead desktop Haswell chips used in the new Mini?... They are efficient enough and cost less then the mobile chips they use in the Mini...
Also be on the lookout for the GTX 980M/GTX 970M... They may end up powering the new retina iMac and look like very good performers.
I'll buy that and I may just pay $1500-2000 for it. Give me the choice.
I'm just saying the TUAW idea is stupid... Those specs are the same as the baseline New Mac Pro($2500 in the refurb store by the way)... Shrinking the case wouldn't lower the price.
All I want is a headless IMac with a desktop I7 processor and dedicated graphics. It's not too much to ask.
All I want is a headless IMac with a desktop I7 processor and dedicated graphics. It's not too much to ask.
All I want is a headless IMac with a desktop I7 processor and dedicated graphics. It's not too much to ask.
I didn't think I was going to feel it that much but my 2013 MBA i5 is just way too slow compared to my previous PC with a quad-core i7 2600k overclocked to 4.5GHz.
One of the things I really like about the current mac mini is it's extremely low power consumption. At maximum, it draws 85w. At idle, it draws 11w. At those levels, I wouldn't worry about leaving it on 24/7.
Most PC Desktops have at least a 200w power supply, many have much higher. Which makes sense, because a desktop class Intel CPU draws at least 65w. Some of the higher end CPUs draw 85w. A single component in a desktop draws as much power as an entire Mac Mini running at full blast.
I want the Mac Mini to remain super efficient with low power consumption.
and I can appreciate that. I would like a mid tier headless IMac though and I think there are plenty of PC people that would like that also . It's a hole between the Mini and Pro.
People have been wanting this for many years. A search for "Mac Pro mini" brought up posts going back to 2006 here
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/206175/
And there is wishing for the return of the Mac Cube as far back as 2002:
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/7018/
So this wish has not been fulfilled for over a decade and probably will never be. (Hey, I'd buy it too!)
Let's say that Apple decides to follow the design cues of the Mac Pro and turn the Mac mini into a squat cylinder, bumps the CPU to a quad-core 3.7 GHz Intel Xeon ("Ivy Bridge-EP"), adds RAM expandibility to 32 GB, and sports an AMD FirePro D300 graphics coprocessor. Throw in 802.11ac capability and Thunderbolt 2, and you've got quite the nice little machine."
A way too long, just refer to this 30th anniversary of the original Apple pride the Mac launched by Steve Jobs at 1985.
So this really don't gives us cues on the new products, but an Mac centered keynote.
And since it's been too long maybe they realize it's time to get rid of the old Mac line and become a Windows PC manufacturer.